I'm listening to him even now say he wants to change
his “religious freedom law” so it is NOT “religious freedom.”
He says he wants it changed to say it does NOT give businesses the
“right” to refuse business to ANYONE, for any reason. Which
cancels the entire effect of the law. But the law never DID “give
them that right.” The CONSTITUTION gives them that right. What he
does not say is there IS no “right” to DEMAND somebody accept
business that is against their religious beliefs. What he's doing
makes the law say they have religious liberty EXCEPT for refusing to
do business with gays, which puts gays in a “special place” never
intended in law.
WHY
WAS THAT LAW NECESSARY? The question I ask about the Indiana
“religious liberty law” is this: “Why was such a law necessary
in the first place?” Religious liberty is ALREADY assured in
FEDERAL law. Why did Indiana think a state law was necessary?” I
have no problem with gays and what they do except when they demand
“rights” that are not in the Constitution. The odd thing here is
that when the federal law concerning religious freedom was passed and
signed by Bill Clinton, the very people who are screaming “foul”
about this praised it then. Obama (then a senator) voted FOR it.
NO
RIGHT TO DENY SERVICES: Indiana Gov. Mike Pence now says, “This law
doesn't give ANYONE the right to deny services to ANYONE. No, it
doesn't. The CONSTITUTION does! I. As a business owner, I have the
“right” to refuse to do business with ANYBODY, and not have to
even GIVE a reason. And I will do so. That doesn't mean I will not do
business with gays. I have no “religious exception” to what they
do or what they are. But I DO reserve the right to not provide a stun
gun to a KNOWN CRIMINAL, and I HAVE that right. I don't HAVE TO do
business with ANYBODY. Why we waste time on this crap when Islamic
terrorists are beheading little girls, I don't know!
RIGHT IN
OUR MIDST! Proud terrorists are right in our midst! In Florida, Barry
University officials APPROVED a “pro-ISIS group on their campus,
just making them change their name “Because technically, we're at
war with them.” “Technically?” We're about as much at war with
them as we have ever been with ANYBODY, including the Japanese and the
Nazis in WWII. And they APPROVED this “club?” Who “only want to
HELP OUR enemies?” These people are TRAITORS! They should be
IMPRISONED! This kind of thing is not allowed as “freedom of
speech.” Americans are not allowed to support our ENEMIES! Let
alone do it publicly.
IN
A “NEW PHASE”: According to Secretary of State John Dumbo, the
“discussions” on the Iran nuclear problem “will continue in a
'new phase' since the original deadline has passed.” Which means
they are IGNORING their SELF-IMPOSED deadline and going right on with
the “dog and pony show” designed to get SOME KIND OF an
“agreement” for Iran to ignore so Obama can say he “got an
agreement with Iran.” We all know they WILL ignore it. They always
do. It's in their “rule book” that it's OKAY to LIE to advance
Islam.
WE
SUPPORT NUKE DEAL? Obama has put out the word that “A majority of
Americans support Obama's Iran nuke deal.” There are two little
problems: One, nobody knows what's IN the deal. And we don't have to
approve it to see what's in it like Peelosi thinks is true with our
own laws. Second, we DON'T approve it. No way! If we did, it would be
presented to Congress for IT'S approval, according to law. But it has
not, and never WILL be. Obama is only saying this to make fools think
it is approved by a majority so they'll “knuckle under.”
.