How Gun Haters Think

One woman who survived a rape attempt and later became an effective activist against disarming people like her got a message recently from an anti-gun fool. It reads in part, “Shania: yiou (sic) shouldn't have a gun because you are a danger to yourself and others.” What kind of STUPID reasoning he uses to get to that assumption, I don't know. He goes on to say that if he dated her and she grew tired of him she would just pull out her gun and shoot him. If she were stupid enough to date this fool, she should probably shoot herself.

PREFERRING CRIMINALS: In California, they just passed a measure in the legislature that shortened the sentences for convicted violent criminals who committed crimes with guns. This confirms what I've been thinking, all along. That Dumocrats prefer the criminals to the law-abiding people. These are the same Dumocrats who moan and whine about how bad GUNS are, and then they make sure there are many more violent criminals out on the streets. This is how liberals coddle criminals, but is more obvious in California.

NOT LIKE THEY PLANNED: The so-called “climate scientists” who did a study to supposedly debunk and discredit Trump's new EPA Director instead managed to do just the opposite. Their “study” proved him RIGHT. They were questioning information about the fact that the climate had NOT been “warming” for about 20 years, but again showed that it HAD. “Climate scientists” hate that. They don't like it when FACTS get in the way of their fairy tales. But you'd think they would be used to that, by now.

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ INTERFERES: The Dumocrats are very vocal in their efforts to convict Trump in the public opinion for “interfering” in a criminal investigation while ignoring the actions of their own FORMER DNC Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (who masterminded the “stacking of the deck” against admitted socialist Bernie Sanders to keep him from getting the presidential nomination) in THREATENING the Chief of the DC Police. That's DIRECT “interference with a criminal investigation.” Will she be charged? Nah. She's a Dumocrat, after all.

WHO LISTENS TO CHELSEA? Nobody of any consequence. Only Dumocrats. They include her in many different activities to help “build her resumé.” They did it by having her take part in a typical Dumocrat gathering, the CARE National Conference (whatever THAT means) in DC, at which she declared that “child marriage is directly interconnected with climate change.” Where the hell she gets that, I don't know. Neither does she. She is NOT somebody who would KNOW such things, and only spouts what she's been TOLD. She is not qualified to even SAY such things.

NATO GIGGLED: The NATO members giggled amongst themselves as President trump “called them out” on their failure to pay their fair share as they agreed to do when FORMING NATO. They thought it was funny. But they'll laugh out of the other side of their mouths when countries who refuse to “pay up” are attacked, and we don't “run up and help.” They think they can keep ignoring their responsibilities without suffering, and they're wrong, with a guy like Trump in charge.

.