Thursday, July 9, 2009

They're Panicked

Obama’s government thought they’d come in and just “spend their way out of trouble.” It hasn’t worked, because Keynesian economics NEVER works, but they just won’t admit it. Spending money you don’t have will NEVER get you out of money troubles. They also won’t admit that lowering taxes will INCREASE the “tax take.” They’re very good at denying the evidence that is right in front of their faces.

“BOTTOMLESS PIT”: Politicians look at the taxpayer as an “endless supply of money” for their “tax and spend” scams. The government actually BLOCKED an audit of the Federal Reserve. The private company that acts as if it were a government agency and CONTROLS our money supply. Probably for the same reason they blocked ANY investigation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as they destroyed our economy.

TRANSPARENCY IN GOVERNMENT: Obama promised us “transparency in government.” Why then, is he not PRACTICING what he preached? Why is he BLOCKING an audit of the Federal Reserve, the quasi-government agency that CONTROLS our money supply? Probably because he doesn’t want us to know the “secrets” of how his administration is RAPING us.

WHAT IS A “HATE CRIME?” Soon it will be ANYTHING the government doesn’t like. This is a way to control your THOUGHTS. And it will be subjective, which means it will be subject to the DEFINITION of what you say as “being offensive.” That this “flies in the face” of the First Amendment doesn’t seem to bother them, especially since they’ve been ignoring the constitution since even before the ink dried on its signatures.

SLOW, INEXORABLE CREEP: Against our liberties, mostly done with subjective laws, that allow those enforcing them to decide if you’re a lawbreaker or not. The “Hate Crime” laws they’re now trying to pass are aimed specifically at conservative talk show hosts and you can bet Obama will appoint a “radio czar” if it is passed, to prosecute such as rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, etc. for statements this “czar” decides are “hate crimes.” Under this law, they (and I) would be committing countless “hate crimes” every day.

TIT FOR TAT: Some people say the liberals ought to be careful what they institute. That “hate crime” laws could be used against THEM as well as their enemies. But have you ever seen a liberal administration “go after” someone who says something the liberals approve of? A law is no good if they will not enforce it against everyone.

No comments:

Post a Comment