Is There Anywhere An Obama Doesn't Crash?

Michelle Obama appeared at the Oscars as a “presenter,” albeit from far, far, away, which tells us how much she appreciates the efforts of the Hollywooders who paid for her husband’s election, twice. Moreover, it showed her disdain for the military, some members of which stood behind her, much like furniture. What the hell she was DOING there escapes me, except to pay off some election  commitments.

KERRY AS SEC. OF STATE: Whoever told Obama that John Kerry (who served in Viet Nam, don’t’cha know?) was a wise choice for Sec. of State? I guess he’s maybe a LITTLE better than Hillary, who messed things up royally, but only a little. I predict he’s going to mess things up a LOT worse, and the press corps is going to do its best to cover it up. Are there any more FOOLS they can appoint to high office? (Don't answer that. Obama might hear you.)

TEA PARTY KNOW-HOW: On Facebook, the Tea Party put a photo that says it all: a sign that says, “What part of ‘will not be infringed’ do you not understand?” They should have specifically aimed that at Obama and his “band of thieves,” but they didn’t. We all know it is for them, though. Every tenet of the new laws they’re proposing, as well as of the old laws already in effect, are an “infringement” on our rights.

DISARMING OUR VETERANS:  “King” Obama really thinks he can use the medical problems visited upon veterans by their participation in the politicians’ wars to remove from them, one by one, their rights; first of all their right to “keep and bear arms” by simply sending them a letter telling them he is doing it. But with ILLEGAL guns being so easily available, he shouldn’t count on them being helpless because they won’t be unarmed when his thugs come to take what’s theirs.

TEA PARTY KNOW-HOW: On Facebook, the Tea Party put a photo that says it all: a sign that says, “What part of ‘will not be infringed’ do you not understand?” They should have specifically aimed that at Obama and his “band of thieves,” but they didn’t. We all know it is for them, though. Every tenet of the new laws they’re proposing, as well as of the old laws already in effect, are an “infringement” on our rights.
.