The “anti-gun nuts” are already trying to blame the shooting in Tucson, Arizona that killed a federal judge and critically wounded a U. S. Representative on the “lack of gun laws” in what was known as “the wild, wild west.” They’re also making a “big thing” of the “horrible things” the Tea Partiers said about her during the election. What about the "horrible things" that were said about the Tea Party by Democrats? Frankly, as a Tea Party supporter, I say that’s a bunch of bull. The Tea Party was NOT involved. This guy was insane and his "politics" were all over the place. What he did had nothing to do with the Tea Parties.
SHOULD WE GET RID OF FREE SPEECH? The sheriff in charge of the investigation into the shooting of Arizona Representative Gifford decries the effect of “free speech” on people who are “around the bend” anyway. So what should we do? Get rid of free speech? He criticizes the “awful things” that were said about Gifford during the recent election by “Tea Parties.” But what about the “awful things” Democrats said about Tea Party members? Did THAT result in a shooting or killing? He was quick to say she was the “target,” but cited nothing to support that opinion. The target could easily have been the judge, who has received death threats in the past. Looks like he won’t be looking in any other direction.
ANYBODY THERE WAS A “TARGET:” The guy who killed 6 people, including a nine-year-old child and a federal judge, and wounded a congresswoman, among 19 others, was insane. Anybody at that meeting could have been his “target,” or nobody in particular. He went there because it was a political meeting, and he hated politicians. Gifford just happened to be the closest to him, since she was the one hosting it. So she got shot first. This kind of “crazy” is likely to pop up anywhere, and authorities need to look closely into his motivations, rather than ASSUME he “targeted” Gifford and had been "listening to the Tea Parties."
GUN LAWS AREN’T GOING TO HELP: People are already talking about “tighter gun laws” as a “solution” to the “problem” revealed by the shooting that killed a federal judge (and 5 other people) and injured a congresswoman. But “tighter gun laws” will not help. Crazy people who do such things are not going to be deterred by a law that says they can’t be armed. And the tighter the gun laws in any given area, the easier it is to get guns illegally if you don’t care about illegality. Which such people don’t.
THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTION: I’ve asked this question many times, of many people, mostly anti-gun politicians, and so far have not received a satisfactory answer. The question: “What makes you think a CRIMINAL, whose entire life is breaking the law, will OBEY a law that says he can’t be armed?” That’s because there IS no answer that doesn’t betray their ignorance of human nature and hurt their cause. They usually just "brush me off" by saying "that doesn't matter," or some other bullcrap.
ALL OVER THE MAP: The guy who shot the judge and congresswoman (and 5 others) in Arizona had views that were “all over the map,” according to those who have investigated him. But still they are trying to pin this insane shooting on “the right.” All without any proof of anything. They’re also trying to pin it on “Free speech, trying to advance their agenda to eliminate free speech.
.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Get To Something Important!
John Elway was announced as the number three man in the Denver Bronco’s organization on Thursday and the radio station that broadcasts Rush Limbaugh in Denver interrupted his show and ran the press conference in its entirety, INCLUDING all the inane questions usually asked by sports reporters (an hour's worth) while nobody heard what went on in Rush’s show while all this was going on. What’s more important? Who runs the Broncos? Or the important information Rush brings us?
“EVERYBODY KNOWS”: That’s what all liberals say just before they say something stupid. Joy Behar (Blow3hard) did it just before she said Sarah Palin could never get elected president. She HOPES, anyway. Sarah has a lot better chance than does Joy! At least she’s smart enough to recognize reality, which Joy apparently is not. Fact is, everybody does NOT know.
HIDING IT: That’s what the man who authored that ill-fated regulation requiring doctors to “discuss” those “end of life issues” (death panels) with their patients if they wanted to collect the pittance Medicare pays them wanted. He thought that “the longer Americans don’t notice this, the better our chances of keeping it.” Sorry; that horse has already gone and your regulation along with it. I know you’re going to try it again, and I hope enough people are paying attention to scotch these continuing efforts.
IT’S NOT ABOUT MONEY, NANCY! Nancy Peelosi is “all bent out of shape” about the Republicans insisting the Constitution be read to Congress. She says it’s going to cost a LOT of money. This may be the only time members of Congress get to hear the details of the Constitution, so what has it cost us NOT to read it? A good illustration of Nancy’s lack of intelligence is when she said “repealing the health care law will cost us money.” I’d like to see her detail just how that will happen.
CONFIRMED: DALEY CHIEF OF STAFF: The Chicago mob has taken over in Washington. Obama’s original chief of staff has resigned to attempt to succeed the current Chicago mayor while the youngest son of Daley Dynasty patriarch goes to Washington to take over his job. Who knows: maybe they’ll just move Chicago to Washington.
“RELATIVELY MODEST PAY”: That’s what Obama’s “press flack” calls the $175,000.00 a year he makes to repeat Obama’s lies to the world. Other liberals say $250,000 a year is RICH. That nobody NEEDS to make that much (What gives them the right to dictate how much a person “NEEDS” to make?). Most government employees make more than $150,000 a year, which is probably why Gibbs thinks his pay is “relatively modest.” I’d like to have made anywhere NEAR that much, at any time I was working.
.
“EVERYBODY KNOWS”: That’s what all liberals say just before they say something stupid. Joy Behar (Blow3hard) did it just before she said Sarah Palin could never get elected president. She HOPES, anyway. Sarah has a lot better chance than does Joy! At least she’s smart enough to recognize reality, which Joy apparently is not. Fact is, everybody does NOT know.
HIDING IT: That’s what the man who authored that ill-fated regulation requiring doctors to “discuss” those “end of life issues” (death panels) with their patients if they wanted to collect the pittance Medicare pays them wanted. He thought that “the longer Americans don’t notice this, the better our chances of keeping it.” Sorry; that horse has already gone and your regulation along with it. I know you’re going to try it again, and I hope enough people are paying attention to scotch these continuing efforts.
IT’S NOT ABOUT MONEY, NANCY! Nancy Peelosi is “all bent out of shape” about the Republicans insisting the Constitution be read to Congress. She says it’s going to cost a LOT of money. This may be the only time members of Congress get to hear the details of the Constitution, so what has it cost us NOT to read it? A good illustration of Nancy’s lack of intelligence is when she said “repealing the health care law will cost us money.” I’d like to see her detail just how that will happen.
CONFIRMED: DALEY CHIEF OF STAFF: The Chicago mob has taken over in Washington. Obama’s original chief of staff has resigned to attempt to succeed the current Chicago mayor while the youngest son of Daley Dynasty patriarch goes to Washington to take over his job. Who knows: maybe they’ll just move Chicago to Washington.
“RELATIVELY MODEST PAY”: That’s what Obama’s “press flack” calls the $175,000.00 a year he makes to repeat Obama’s lies to the world. Other liberals say $250,000 a year is RICH. That nobody NEEDS to make that much (What gives them the right to dictate how much a person “NEEDS” to make?). Most government employees make more than $150,000 a year, which is probably why Gibbs thinks his pay is “relatively modest.” I’d like to have made anywhere NEAR that much, at any time I was working.
.
Friday, January 7, 2011
The Beginning of the End
Democrats are saying that raising the debt ceiling will be “the beginning of the end” for Republicans. Sheesh! How many times did DEMOCRATS raise the debt ceiling? Losing an election sure changes things, doesn’t it?
RATS LEAVING SINKING SHIP: Rahm Emanuel quit to run for Chicago mayor. Robert Gibbs, his “mouthpiece,” is leaving “to do something else.” He doesn’t say what. Robert Gibbs is one of the LEAST respected, least BELIEVED press secretaries in recent memory. Maybe he has come to realize this and want to do something where his incompetence is not so well recognized. Many others are leaving, too. They probably don’t want to be with Obama when he “goes down.”
STAGEHANDS MAKE $240,000 A YEAR! At Carnegie Hall, the stagehands make more money than most of the people who ATTEND the Carnegie Hall events. Obama says anybody making over $150,000 a year is RICH. Maybe somebody ought to bring this to his attention so his statements will reflect REALITY. That is, IF knowledge will change what he says.
LIES, LIES, LIES! Liberals like to sling around the “lies” accusation, but usually when they do, THEY are lying. They never offer any examples of lies when they accuse us because they can’t. There aren’t any. They constantly accuse Glenn Beck of lying, but he offers video proof of almost everything he claims. I’d love for them to offer some examples of his “lies” so we can show THEIR lies.
HICK APPOINTS UNION ACTIVIST: To head the LABOR Department in Colorado. New Governor Hickenlooper promised a government that would reflect BOTH SIDES. How appointing a UNION ACTIVIST as head of the Department of Labor does this, I don’t know.
SARAH PALIN IS STUPID! That’s what the liberals say about her, to a man (or woman). Funny, this stupid woman has “had their number” every time. One example is the “death panels.” She absolutely called it on that one. Obama and his crown “cried foul” when she called it, but then later they tried it. They were “called on it” again, and had to “run away from it.” I predict they’ll try again and again and will rebuffed every time because Sarah first named it. She frightens them, which is why they try so hard to discredit her. But she discredits THEM.
.
RATS LEAVING SINKING SHIP: Rahm Emanuel quit to run for Chicago mayor. Robert Gibbs, his “mouthpiece,” is leaving “to do something else.” He doesn’t say what. Robert Gibbs is one of the LEAST respected, least BELIEVED press secretaries in recent memory. Maybe he has come to realize this and want to do something where his incompetence is not so well recognized. Many others are leaving, too. They probably don’t want to be with Obama when he “goes down.”
STAGEHANDS MAKE $240,000 A YEAR! At Carnegie Hall, the stagehands make more money than most of the people who ATTEND the Carnegie Hall events. Obama says anybody making over $150,000 a year is RICH. Maybe somebody ought to bring this to his attention so his statements will reflect REALITY. That is, IF knowledge will change what he says.
LIES, LIES, LIES! Liberals like to sling around the “lies” accusation, but usually when they do, THEY are lying. They never offer any examples of lies when they accuse us because they can’t. There aren’t any. They constantly accuse Glenn Beck of lying, but he offers video proof of almost everything he claims. I’d love for them to offer some examples of his “lies” so we can show THEIR lies.
HICK APPOINTS UNION ACTIVIST: To head the LABOR Department in Colorado. New Governor Hickenlooper promised a government that would reflect BOTH SIDES. How appointing a UNION ACTIVIST as head of the Department of Labor does this, I don’t know.
SARAH PALIN IS STUPID! That’s what the liberals say about her, to a man (or woman). Funny, this stupid woman has “had their number” every time. One example is the “death panels.” She absolutely called it on that one. Obama and his crown “cried foul” when she called it, but then later they tried it. They were “called on it” again, and had to “run away from it.” I predict they’ll try again and again and will rebuffed every time because Sarah first named it. She frightens them, which is why they try so hard to discredit her. But she discredits THEM.
.
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Tea Parties--Extremist?
The media—including Fox, strangely enough, are trying very hard to paint the Tea Parties as extremists. But what’s extremist about insisting the Congress make laws according to the Constitution? That they READ the laws they vote on? That they don’t make collectivist laws that are against the very BASICS on which this country is based? That this country return to the concepts of the free market that made it great? This is not extremism. It is common sense! They’re not
WHO REGULATES THE REGULATORS? Politicians constantly tell us those involved in free market activities are “ripping us off.” Really? Who regulates those politicians and bureaucrats who tell us this without ANY kind of proof? Who thinks those “regulators” are any more honest than anybody else? They’re not! Each one of them have their “friends,” just like everybody else. The question is, “Do they make it easier for their friends while making it harder on their enemies?
JOINING THE CHORUS: “Cutting spending seems to be the buzz words in Washington today, since the Republicans “took over.” Obama is one of the biggest screamers of the phrase, though he is the worst offender on that score, having spent more money than ALL the presidents before him, in just two years. Maybe he should have thought of that before he spent more money than there IS.
WAS HE A DIABETIC? Former Bush official John P. Wheeler was found murdered and thrown in a trash dump after being seen wandering around in a dazed and confused condition not long before. Nobody bothered to help him and that may have led to his murder. He may have been having a diabetic event (those symptoms are very telling) or may have been assaulted, which might have produced similar symptoms. In any case, if he was wandering around in a confused state from a diabetes incident, he might have been seen as an “easy target” by a mugger, who ended up killing him.
IT’S TOO EASY: When I first started doing what I do I worried about being able to find enough information. That has NEVER been a problem. All the information I need simply “falls into my hands” without much effort on my part. So why don’t other people pick up on it? Why are so many people ignorant of what’s going on? The answer is simple; they just don’t pay attention. I do. Actually, I come across more information than I can physically use, all the time. More people need to PAY ATTENTION, so that their own government cannot swindle them so easily.
HE WANTED A FREE RIDE HOME: An illegal alien decided he wanted to go back home, but didn’t have enough money to buy a ticket. So he went up to a policeman and told him he was an illegal alien so he’d get deported and the government would pay for his ticket. He was refused. So he went out and stole a police car to joyride. He was arrested and deported. He got his “free ride.”
.
WHO REGULATES THE REGULATORS? Politicians constantly tell us those involved in free market activities are “ripping us off.” Really? Who regulates those politicians and bureaucrats who tell us this without ANY kind of proof? Who thinks those “regulators” are any more honest than anybody else? They’re not! Each one of them have their “friends,” just like everybody else. The question is, “Do they make it easier for their friends while making it harder on their enemies?
JOINING THE CHORUS: “Cutting spending seems to be the buzz words in Washington today, since the Republicans “took over.” Obama is one of the biggest screamers of the phrase, though he is the worst offender on that score, having spent more money than ALL the presidents before him, in just two years. Maybe he should have thought of that before he spent more money than there IS.
WAS HE A DIABETIC? Former Bush official John P. Wheeler was found murdered and thrown in a trash dump after being seen wandering around in a dazed and confused condition not long before. Nobody bothered to help him and that may have led to his murder. He may have been having a diabetic event (those symptoms are very telling) or may have been assaulted, which might have produced similar symptoms. In any case, if he was wandering around in a confused state from a diabetes incident, he might have been seen as an “easy target” by a mugger, who ended up killing him.
IT’S TOO EASY: When I first started doing what I do I worried about being able to find enough information. That has NEVER been a problem. All the information I need simply “falls into my hands” without much effort on my part. So why don’t other people pick up on it? Why are so many people ignorant of what’s going on? The answer is simple; they just don’t pay attention. I do. Actually, I come across more information than I can physically use, all the time. More people need to PAY ATTENTION, so that their own government cannot swindle them so easily.
HE WANTED A FREE RIDE HOME: An illegal alien decided he wanted to go back home, but didn’t have enough money to buy a ticket. So he went up to a policeman and told him he was an illegal alien so he’d get deported and the government would pay for his ticket. He was refused. So he went out and stole a police car to joyride. He was arrested and deported. He got his “free ride.”
.
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Get The Hell Out of the Way!
Obama keeps acting like he doesn’t know how to improve the economy. He appoints committee after committee, all of which come up with nothing that works when the answer is as plain as the ears that dwarf his face: get the hell out of the way and let the free market do its work! The free market CREATED the economy of this country, which WAS an economy that was the envy of the world until Democrats and other liberals started playing with it.
CITIZEN’S REINVESTMENT ACT OF 1976: It didn’t start with this law, but this law made what we’re experiencing today inevitable. It FORCED lenders to loan money to people they KNEW were deadbeats, a “recipe for disaster.” It was a scheme to “take over the country” in a bloodless coup. And it worked. But they didn’t count on America waking up and getting rid of them. They thought this country were a bunch of wusses and would do nothing as they took our rights and money away in big numbers.
“OBAMA’S STASH”: You ask the average multi-generational welfare recipient where the money Obama is giving them comes from, and they don’t know; nor care. They say it comes from “Obama’s stash.” Apparently they neither know, nor care, that “Obama’s stash” comes from the taxpayer’s (your) pocket. He HAS no “stash” other than that.
WHO PAYS THE TAXES? The top 10% of income earners pays 70% of the income taxes paid. That's according to the IRS itself. This is a figure liberals would rather you not know. If you cite this figure to them, they “poo-poo” it; they can’t show you any figures to PROVE it is wrong (while we CAN show them to prove it right) but they INSIST you’re wrong.
COLMES RIDICULES THOSE WHO CAN’T READ A 2,000 PAGE DOCUMENT: Alan Colmes, the liberal half of the now defunct Hannity-Colmes show on Fox (you know, the network the liberals say only tells one side, but which is the only one that tells BOTH sides) ridiculed the people who talked bout “reading that 2,000 page document” that was Obama’s health care swindle. As if Nancy Peelosi actually gave them time to do so. Somebody ought to slap Colmes in the puss when he makes cracks like that.
IT’S NOT BROKEN; DON’T FIX IT!! The Internet is being run fine by the ISPs who are running it right now. They (with the possible exception of AOL, which attempts to censor conservative thought on occasion) do a good job. To solve that little problem, conservatives just don’t use AOL. Soon AOL will go out of business, and viola! Problem solved, all without the involvement of a liberal government. The government has no power to regulate the Internet, except that they illegally give themselves. I will not allow them to “regulate” me, in any way. It’s a typical liberal power grab and will not be allowed.
.
CITIZEN’S REINVESTMENT ACT OF 1976: It didn’t start with this law, but this law made what we’re experiencing today inevitable. It FORCED lenders to loan money to people they KNEW were deadbeats, a “recipe for disaster.” It was a scheme to “take over the country” in a bloodless coup. And it worked. But they didn’t count on America waking up and getting rid of them. They thought this country were a bunch of wusses and would do nothing as they took our rights and money away in big numbers.
“OBAMA’S STASH”: You ask the average multi-generational welfare recipient where the money Obama is giving them comes from, and they don’t know; nor care. They say it comes from “Obama’s stash.” Apparently they neither know, nor care, that “Obama’s stash” comes from the taxpayer’s (your) pocket. He HAS no “stash” other than that.
WHO PAYS THE TAXES? The top 10% of income earners pays 70% of the income taxes paid. That's according to the IRS itself. This is a figure liberals would rather you not know. If you cite this figure to them, they “poo-poo” it; they can’t show you any figures to PROVE it is wrong (while we CAN show them to prove it right) but they INSIST you’re wrong.
COLMES RIDICULES THOSE WHO CAN’T READ A 2,000 PAGE DOCUMENT: Alan Colmes, the liberal half of the now defunct Hannity-Colmes show on Fox (you know, the network the liberals say only tells one side, but which is the only one that tells BOTH sides) ridiculed the people who talked bout “reading that 2,000 page document” that was Obama’s health care swindle. As if Nancy Peelosi actually gave them time to do so. Somebody ought to slap Colmes in the puss when he makes cracks like that.
IT’S NOT BROKEN; DON’T FIX IT!! The Internet is being run fine by the ISPs who are running it right now. They (with the possible exception of AOL, which attempts to censor conservative thought on occasion) do a good job. To solve that little problem, conservatives just don’t use AOL. Soon AOL will go out of business, and viola! Problem solved, all without the involvement of a liberal government. The government has no power to regulate the Internet, except that they illegally give themselves. I will not allow them to “regulate” me, in any way. It’s a typical liberal power grab and will not be allowed.
.
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Ignoring the Constitution
Many of our very LAWMAKERS ignore the Constitution as a matter of course. Once a reporter asked Nancy Peelosi where in the Constitution does it say this government can force people to buy something. Her answer? “Are you serious?” I've heard other congresspeople ridicule people for suggesting they follow the Constitution or even READ the bills they vote into law.
“A NATION OF SHEEP”: Judge Napolitano of Fox News called us “a nation of sheep” when he observed a TSA agent fingering a woman’s breasts while “feeling her up” as a condition to letting her on an airplane while she just stood there and took it. He’s right. If we continue to allow this, we ARE “a nation of sheep.” I would not stand for it. I wouldn’t mind if the TSA agent was a pretty blond, but if a man “touched my junk” I’d slap him silly right there. I wouldn’t just “threaten him with arrest.”
“HIS MIRANDA RIGHTS”: Obama wants soldiers in the field to read terrorists their “Miranda Rights” when they’re captured on the field of battle. Only problem is, they DON’T HAVE Miranda Rights. They’re not American citizens. They’re foreign combatants. Reading them their “Miranda Rights” is not only STUPID, it shows mass INCOMPETENCE on the part of those running things in Washington.
STUPID STATEMENTS: At the top of the list of STUPID STATEMENTS made by politicians and ignored by the press and everybody else is Nancy Peelosi’s “We have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it” crack while stumping for Obama’s health care swindle bill. Apparently she doesn’t know that’s not the way we do things in this country. We’re not a dictatorship where the only way to find out what’s in a new law is to PASS it. We need to GET RID OF this kind of dumb-ass.
ARROGANCE: Speaking of arrogance, how arrogant must Nancy Peelosi BE to make such a stupid statement as the one above and not expect to be taken to task over it? She knows most of the people in power in Washington (now) either agree with her, or just don’t care. In any case, such arrogance needs to be REMOVED from Washington and a process put in place to see that it never happens again.
A “BANDAID”: Every “stimulus program” we’ve seen is nothing but a “bandaid” on a “seeping wound” in our economy. It adds NOTHING to the economy. It just “spreads the wealth” around, something Karl Marx advised in his Communist Manifesto. It takes tax money and gives it to the failures of society, thus rewarding failure. Yet Obama keeps trying it, over and over, though he KNOWS it will never work. It DOES, however, allow him to reward his friends in a quasi-legal manner.
.
“A NATION OF SHEEP”: Judge Napolitano of Fox News called us “a nation of sheep” when he observed a TSA agent fingering a woman’s breasts while “feeling her up” as a condition to letting her on an airplane while she just stood there and took it. He’s right. If we continue to allow this, we ARE “a nation of sheep.” I would not stand for it. I wouldn’t mind if the TSA agent was a pretty blond, but if a man “touched my junk” I’d slap him silly right there. I wouldn’t just “threaten him with arrest.”
“HIS MIRANDA RIGHTS”: Obama wants soldiers in the field to read terrorists their “Miranda Rights” when they’re captured on the field of battle. Only problem is, they DON’T HAVE Miranda Rights. They’re not American citizens. They’re foreign combatants. Reading them their “Miranda Rights” is not only STUPID, it shows mass INCOMPETENCE on the part of those running things in Washington.
STUPID STATEMENTS: At the top of the list of STUPID STATEMENTS made by politicians and ignored by the press and everybody else is Nancy Peelosi’s “We have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it” crack while stumping for Obama’s health care swindle bill. Apparently she doesn’t know that’s not the way we do things in this country. We’re not a dictatorship where the only way to find out what’s in a new law is to PASS it. We need to GET RID OF this kind of dumb-ass.
ARROGANCE: Speaking of arrogance, how arrogant must Nancy Peelosi BE to make such a stupid statement as the one above and not expect to be taken to task over it? She knows most of the people in power in Washington (now) either agree with her, or just don’t care. In any case, such arrogance needs to be REMOVED from Washington and a process put in place to see that it never happens again.
A “BANDAID”: Every “stimulus program” we’ve seen is nothing but a “bandaid” on a “seeping wound” in our economy. It adds NOTHING to the economy. It just “spreads the wealth” around, something Karl Marx advised in his Communist Manifesto. It takes tax money and gives it to the failures of society, thus rewarding failure. Yet Obama keeps trying it, over and over, though he KNOWS it will never work. It DOES, however, allow him to reward his friends in a quasi-legal manner.
.
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Unions At Work
Mayor Bloomberg got the blame, but the cause of the lack of street clearing in New York was a “work slowdown” sponsored by the city’s unions to protest the city’s lowering of wages and laying off of union members. A 70-year-old woman and a newborn child DIED (and how many others we don’t know about) because of it. But the union didn’t care. They made their point.
REGULATORY ROADBLOCK: There is no shortage of innovation in this country, but the innovators can’t get over the regulatory roadblocks placed upon them by this government. Politicians decry “foreign manufacture” of products sold in the United States, but they promote regulatory roadblocks that make it impossible for innovators to do anything with their innovative ideas in this country and find it necessary to go to manufacturers in other countries, most often communist China, whose prices are lower than anyone else’s because they use slave labor in their factories and pay them little if anything.
TAKEOVER BY IMMIGRATION: If the Islamic terrorists can’t “take over” this country by killing us, they will one day do so by simply outnumbering us. The Muslim population in European countries is rising propitiously (a whole lot, for those in Rio Linda). In some countries, Muslims are in the majority—and I’m not talking about countries that are traditionally Muslim. I'm talking about France. And you can bet when Muslims are in the majority in this country they will make laws Americans don’t like. But since they will be in the majority then, there will be nothing we can do about it. Before that, we will be “ruled” by a Hispanic majority. Hispanics in the Southwest in this country are ALREADY in the majority and the number of Hispanic names you see on the ballot in various elections is rising, again propitiously. Something to think about.
“LIVING CONSTITUTION”: What does that mean? To a liberal (who coined that definition) it means the Constitution is just what the Supreme Court says it is, regardless of what’s written in it. One Supreme Court Justice can change it, simply by saying so. That’s wrong. The Constitution itself gives specific instructions on how it can be changed. NO other method can be legally used. All a Supreme Court Justice can do is tell us whether a law is, or is not constitutional, using the words therein, only. Not foreign law, not his personal opinion, ONLY the words IN the Constitution. And that Justice should be removed and imprisoned if he departs from that.
INALIENABLE RIGHTS: Congress cannot bestow “rights” upon us. Our Creator did that. Certain rights are ours by right of BIRTH, no matter what form “our Creator” takes. The Constitution merely RECOGNIZES those rights and Congress cannot change that. The most important right is that of self defense, and to own and use the means to that defense. Next is the right to our own opinion and the right to express that opinion without fear of imprisonment or execution. We do NOT have a “right” to a job paying as much as WE think it should pay. A “right” is something that we have WITHOUT being TAKEN from somebody else.
“TRUMP THE CONSTITUTION?” Some people say International Law “trumps the Constitution” in the United States. Not so! NOTHING “trumps the Constitution” in the United States. There are SOME parts of International Law that we may RECOGNIZE, but not if it goes against the Constitution of the United States, which is the BEDROCK upon which ALL our laws are based, and whose tenets EVERY law made in this country MUST abide.
.
REGULATORY ROADBLOCK: There is no shortage of innovation in this country, but the innovators can’t get over the regulatory roadblocks placed upon them by this government. Politicians decry “foreign manufacture” of products sold in the United States, but they promote regulatory roadblocks that make it impossible for innovators to do anything with their innovative ideas in this country and find it necessary to go to manufacturers in other countries, most often communist China, whose prices are lower than anyone else’s because they use slave labor in their factories and pay them little if anything.
TAKEOVER BY IMMIGRATION: If the Islamic terrorists can’t “take over” this country by killing us, they will one day do so by simply outnumbering us. The Muslim population in European countries is rising propitiously (a whole lot, for those in Rio Linda). In some countries, Muslims are in the majority—and I’m not talking about countries that are traditionally Muslim. I'm talking about France. And you can bet when Muslims are in the majority in this country they will make laws Americans don’t like. But since they will be in the majority then, there will be nothing we can do about it. Before that, we will be “ruled” by a Hispanic majority. Hispanics in the Southwest in this country are ALREADY in the majority and the number of Hispanic names you see on the ballot in various elections is rising, again propitiously. Something to think about.
“LIVING CONSTITUTION”: What does that mean? To a liberal (who coined that definition) it means the Constitution is just what the Supreme Court says it is, regardless of what’s written in it. One Supreme Court Justice can change it, simply by saying so. That’s wrong. The Constitution itself gives specific instructions on how it can be changed. NO other method can be legally used. All a Supreme Court Justice can do is tell us whether a law is, or is not constitutional, using the words therein, only. Not foreign law, not his personal opinion, ONLY the words IN the Constitution. And that Justice should be removed and imprisoned if he departs from that.
INALIENABLE RIGHTS: Congress cannot bestow “rights” upon us. Our Creator did that. Certain rights are ours by right of BIRTH, no matter what form “our Creator” takes. The Constitution merely RECOGNIZES those rights and Congress cannot change that. The most important right is that of self defense, and to own and use the means to that defense. Next is the right to our own opinion and the right to express that opinion without fear of imprisonment or execution. We do NOT have a “right” to a job paying as much as WE think it should pay. A “right” is something that we have WITHOUT being TAKEN from somebody else.
“TRUMP THE CONSTITUTION?” Some people say International Law “trumps the Constitution” in the United States. Not so! NOTHING “trumps the Constitution” in the United States. There are SOME parts of International Law that we may RECOGNIZE, but not if it goes against the Constitution of the United States, which is the BEDROCK upon which ALL our laws are based, and whose tenets EVERY law made in this country MUST abide.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)