"Blacks Need Black Doctors"

So sayeth the venerable New York Times, that DC House Organ that fancifully calls itself, “The Newspaper of Record." One of the statistics cited by them still turns my stomach. The one that says the black infant mortality rate is TWICE that of whites. Of course, that ignores the fact that a MAJORITY of black infants are aborted (murdered in the womb). Now imagine if somebody printed a headline saying, “WHITE people need WHITE doctors.” That would be patently RACIST, wouldn't it? So why isn't it when it is said about BLACK people? I often wonder about a lot of things done for black people which, if done for white people would be racism.

CHRISTIANS “HATE GROUPS?” Boy, liberals are sure throwing around that “hate groups” crap these days. Almost as much as they accuse people who disagree with their policies of being RACISTS. That NEITHER are true doesn't seem to bother them at all. Now NBC “Face the Nation” host Bob Schiffier says that reigious groups such as “Family Research Council (FRC)” are racist groups and should be BANNED from television, and the rest of them are IGNORING it. They use as a source, that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) itself a “hate group,” has them on its “Hate Map,” and says they have been “inundated” with complaints. Two of them.

30 YEARS LEFT TO LIVE: The surviving Boston Bomber has been sentenced to DEATH for his part in bombing the finish line at the Boston Marathon, killing several people and wounding many others. I guess that means he only has thirty or so years left to live as they fight over when (or IF) to actually carry out the sentence. It's too bad we don't still operate like they did in the old West. Convict 'em in the morning, hang 'em that afternoon. But I guess they're frightened of killing the wrong person—which is a good fear, since they have killed MANY innocent people, based on somebody's LYING testimony and falsified “evidence”—like the cop who shot Mike Brown to death while Brown tried to kill HIM. Only nobody believed they lied—except for Brown's “homies,” of course.

WOULD JEB INVADE IRAQ? That's one of the top “gotcha questions” asked of Jeb Bush by the liberal media: “Would you have invaded Iraq, knowing what you know now?” Jeb misheard it and answered “Yes.” But the right answer would have been “:yes,” because Saddam, being a staunch Islamic terrorist supporter, with money, “Safe harbor,” and training facilities, was a “legitimate target.” And there WERE weapons of mass destruction there. He just shipped them to Syria. Iraq is NOW a “disaster,” because of Obama. Not because of anything Bush did.

FORCING THEIR RELIGION ON YOU: That's what some liberals are saying today about the “right.” Because they don't want others to push THEIR religions on US. At least, unlike the Muslims, we don't try to force our religion on others at the point of a gun! What the hell's WRONG with these people? There's a wealth of real targets out there, but they insist on aiming at their friends! All “the right” wants to do is reduce the size and influence of government and reduce taxes, whi9le returning to us more freedom, and for that, they think we're the bad guys. How STUPID is that?

SHARPTON AT THE WHITE HOUSE? Why? Why is Al Sharpie...er, uh, Sharpton such a frequent guest at the White House? He's nothing but a “race whore” who makes millions by “whipping up the flames of black on white racism.” So he's welcome in this White House because it's being run by a man who WANTS a race war and Sharpie...uh, Sharpton is helping. He and Obama are the epitome of the fact that you can be judged by the company you keep.

.

At Least He Answers Questions!

Jeb Bush is getting a lot of flack (mostly from Democrats) for his answer to the question about if he would do the same things as his brother did regarding the Iraq war. Missed in all the hooraw is that the question, as asked, was aboiut what he would do under “what they knew then,” not what we know now, and he answwred that he would, indeed, have invaded Iraq. But, unlike Hillary, he does at least ANSWER questions from the press.

  

POWER OUTAGE: Some guy flubbed his dub and ran over a roadside transformer on the freeway and took it out. It took them almost 24 hours to find another one and get it installed and working. Meanwhile we just suffered while they made numerous promises about when it would come back on, all of them wrong.The power went out at about 3 PM Friday and back on (for the last time) about 2 PM Saturday. It went on and off three times before finally coming on and staying on. The outage not only caused me not to be able to use the computer, it took me off the WiFi so I couldn't post anything.; Sorry, folks.

IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO: I maintain that invading Iraq and “taking out” Saddam was ABSOLUTELY the right thing to do, even under what we know today. They DID ultimately find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, even though Saddam had most of them shipped to Syria during the period while we dithered about whether or not to invade. The evidence was there that he helped TRAIN those who did the 9/11 atrocity, and that he gave Islamic terrorists money and a “safe harbor “between missions.”

TO BE EXPECTED: When Americans attacked an Islamic terrorist compound in Syria, they used civilians as “cover,” making us shoot them before we got to the terrorists, as usual. That this gives them a PR victory goes without saying. But in the long run it didn't do them much good, as we killed all their outer guards, as well as their top “oil production” man. They try to play his death down, saying he “wasn't such a much” in the normal scheme of things, but he was in complete charge of their oil acquisition.. Of course, since he was so unimportant, that's why the compound was surrounded with guards for us to kill.

NEVER NEUTRAL: George Stephanopoulos has always been a Democrat “aparatchick.” Never a “neutral observer.” He has always been such, since way before he testified before a Congressional committee that he “lied to his own notebook.” So why did ABC hire him as an anchor and all-around news man? That's easy. It was for the same reason NBC hired Bill Clinton's daughter Chelsea, for a PART-TIME job at a six-figure salary. To gain favor from Bill and Hillary, expecting Hillary to con herself back into the Oval Office. So it's not surprising that George not only CONTRIBUTED massive amounts of money to the Bill and Hillary Crime Foundation, but he was ACTIVE in their operations all the while PRETENDING to be “neutral.”

PROBLEMS AT INDY: They've had several major accidents in practice for the Indianapolis 500. Most notably the one involving Helio Castronevis, but also the one involving Ed Carpenter, both involving Chevrolets, which has a new “aero package” for this year. The third was Josef Newgarden, Carpenter's team mate. All hit the wall at approximately the same place. If this keeps up, those Indy drivers will have to start getting pilot's licenses. The accidents happening in roughly the same place is less important than all three being Chevys, with that new “aero package.” The speedway might ban that package. All drivers were uninjured, which speaks well of their safety precautions.

ISIS VOWS REVENGE: Ho, hum, so what? They're vowing “revenge” for the raid that killed their top oil official. Will that involve anything other than “everyday business?” They seem to think this is some kind of a FEUD, not a war. “Tit for tat.” You kill one of ours, we kill one of yours.” But it's not. They've declared all-out WAR on us, and they shouldn't be surprised at what they get. Although they're probably surprised Obana “signed off” on this raid I guess he couldn't avoid it, or be exposed as the two-faced Islamic terrorist he is.

WHAT HAVE WE GOT FOR PROSECUTORS? This is the second prosecutor in the Northeast to make an abysmally STUPID statement about a case in which she's involved. Talking about the surviving Boston Bomber, she tells us he SAID he “did it for all other Muslims," then goes on to say “it was NOT a religious crime.” What? How STUPID can she be? Just as stupid as is Obama, I'd guess. You know: the fool who won't recognize an Islamic terrorist operation if the perp got an inch from his face and shouted Allahu Akbar!” right in his face, wetting him down with his spittle.

.

Why All the Black Mayors?

If this country is so racist, why is it every time I see a mayor, top cop, sheriff, or governor holding a press conference about one disaster or another, he (or she) is BLACK?As is the Baltimore mayor and the prosecutor who “rushed to judgment” before all the facts were in and indicted six cops, half of which were black, are black—AND female. I'm not complaining, because I don't give a damn something as unimportant the color of the skin of a politician. What I AM calling attention to is the fact that, even in the SOUTH, where racism is supposed to be so rampant, so many top politicians are black, women, and even black women! How is that even POSSIBLE unless the PEOPLE voted them into office?

IT'S WHAT HE DOES! Obama is criticizing “the rich” who send their children to private schools, while HE sends HIS kids to private schools. He thinks we don't notice things like that. Everything he criticizes others for doing, HE is doing. I can't think of a more “two-faced liar politician” today. He criticizes “the rich,” while HE is “filthy rich,” himself, most of which was gained AFTER he became president—which should tell you something. Like the Clintons, who were “:broke” upon leaving the White House (Hillary SAYS), but are worth hundreds of millions now.

IT'S GOP'S FAULT: Democrats, who have been running things for decades in Philly, are blaming the Republicans for the train crash there. They say Republicans have BLOCKED spending any money on infrastructure, while DEMOCRATS block new money for the railroads to use in installing automatic braking on such lines as this. In the city itself, Democrats have been running things there, too. But whenever anything bad happens, they blame the Republicans, even though Republicans can't even get NOTICED there.

FIRE STEPHANOPOULOS: However the hell he spells it. We knew George Stephanopoulos was a Democrat plant when he was hired by ABC, just as we knew Bill Clinton's daughter Chelsea was hired as a BRIBE so ABC could get preferential treatment if Hillary was ever elected president. Now it is learned that Stephanoupolos “contributed” $75,000.00 to the “Clinton Crime Family Foundation” (This “foundation” is well known as a “money laundering outfit” for the Clintons). How many other things has he done during his stint as an ABC anchor to benefit the Clintons and other Democrats? We all know he is corrupt. We found it out when he testified that he LIED to his own notebook during one appearance before Congress.

SHOULD “BOSTON BOMBER” GET DEATH PENALTY? Absolutely. He wasn't worried about how many people HE killed when he helped set off those bombs. He should have been SHOT when found, as was his brother and co-conspirator. Not given free “room and board” for a long time while the courts decided what we already knew, he is GUILTY. This is not a case where the “evidence” is only “circumstantial” and hinges on a simple lab test. The bombs were traced DIRECTLY to him and his brother. Equal punishment under the law DEMANDS his death. He has said he's “sorry.” He should have thought of that BEFORE setting off those bombs.

“SMALL CHANGE” IN FIRST AMENDMENT: Obama is making a “small change” in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Now, in paperwork to accompany citizenship applications, it is now described as “freedom of worship,” not “freedom of religion,” as it has always been, which means outside of the confines of the church, we have no protection. What makes him think he can do that is beyond me. But he has never let constitutional prohibitions inhibit him in the past, why should he now? Obama should be IMPRISONED for multiple violations of the Constitution. That should be the punishment for willful constitutional violations. Unfortunately, the founders neglected to do that.

.

Predcise Military Attack

The former head of the CIA is still promoting the MYTH that the attack on the embassy buildings in Benghazi was just a bunch of looters, much like those in Baltimore and Ferguson, who just wanted to steal what they could. But his story is belied by the fact that they had the exact coordinates of the building or buildings they wanted to breach and used them to guide mortar attacks. They knew exactly where the ambassador was. It was executed with military efficiency. Personally, I think they had “inside help.” The very fact that Obama and his Secretary of State REFUSED to send help tells me the SOURCE of that help.

“FOX LIES ALL THE TIME”: That's what Obama says. But HE'S the one LYING He keeps saying this, but he presents NO evidence—because there IS none. He's been trying to discredit Fox News ever since he crawled out from under his rock in 2007 and started his run for president. His problem with Fox is that they continue to tell the TRUTH about his crimes and violations of the Constitution. He HATES that. So he trumps up the idea that they LIE, when it's HIM who lies all the time. How do you tell when he's lying? His mouth is open and sounds are coming out. Or he writes something down.

DEMS BLAME REPUBLICANS: Republicans blame Democrats. Libertarians blame both for that Philly train crash. All before the facts are known. There's nothing new about this. The same people blame the same people for ALL disasters. Mostly so they won't be blamed, themselves, and so that they won't feel like they have to DO anything. Meanwhile, who are the first people to rush in and help? The COPS, of course. The most maligned helpers in history. And who among those “rushing in” have to “watch their backs” so that criminals will not shoot them while their backs are turned?

“THEY WERE THE WRONG KIND”: Muslims killed 43 innocent people on a bus in Karache, Pakistan because they “were the wrong kind of Muslims.” this is what passes for “religious understanding” in the Muslim religion. A little known fact is that there are TWO kinds of Muslims: Shiite and Sunni. They are constantly fighting for power between themselves. This is even before they kill “Infidels” (non-believers in Islam itself). There are many further subdivisions between members of the two major groups. Too many to count, really. And the reason for some of those divisions might be a difference in opinion over the definition of a single word.

SOCIETY'S “LOTTERY WINNERS”: This is what Obama and his fools call those who are rich. Those who are rich by their own work, not those who INHERITED their riches from their ancestors, most of whom are fellow liberals. These people DISCOUNT the whole idea that these people may have EARNED their riches. To liberals, FAILURE is something to be PROUD of. And if you're rich, you'd BETTER have inherited it. They don't believe it's possible to EARN riches honestly. They must be going by their own personal experience in how THEY became rich.

“RACISM? AGAIN?”: “Is racism raising its ugly head again?” This is a question some people are asking, as if racism “went away” and is just now “coming back” with the advent of the election of a black man as president (which completely ignores the fact that a white majority ELECTED him, TWICE). It completely ignores the fact that that very black man is PROMOTING black hatred against WHITE people. He desperately wants a race war so he can use it, both to stay in power beyond 2016 and “tighten his grip” on power. There IS no “racism AGAIN.” There is a different KIND of racism being promoted today PROMOTED by Obama.

.

Michelle Blasts Conservative Racism!

She “went off” on it, as if only BLACK people are entitled to be racist, as in what she and her con man husband are promoting today. Yes, there IS some racism left among BOTH conservatives AND liberals, The liberal racism she ignores, in favor of making it SEEM like only conservatives are racist. What a damned FOOL she is! She talks incessantly about WHITE racism while IGNORING the BLACK against white racism she and her fool husband are PROMOTING today!

GELLER “GOT TWO MEN KILLED”: That's what some people, liberals all,and probably some Muslims, too, are saying about the shooting outside of the “Draw the Prophet” contest building. How STUPID are these people? Those men got THEMSELVES killed by coming there to kill others and encountering cops who were good at their jobs, and were ready. Geller had nothing to do with it. She has the RIGHT to hold such an event, and they did NOT have the right to shoot the place up because of it.

MANY LIES TOLD: One of the factors that infuriates me is the lies told by so-called “witnesses” to police shootings where violent criminals are killed, telling such lies as that one who said the guy was “shot in the back” when he was NOT. The most recent instance of that happened in Baltimore, and added to the problems there. It was a main “testimony” in Ferguson, MO, where his “homies” lied incessantly and their lies were “swallowed, hook, line, and sinker” by the liberal media. In Ferguson, that cop, who was only protecting his life and doing his job, has had his life ruined forever by those lies. In Baltimore, SIX cops likewise (half of them black), even if they're not “indicted.”

WAS GELLER RIGHT? They're still arguing over whether Pamela Geller was within her rights to hold a contest she KNEW would lead to violence. SHE WAS. She was illustrating the simple fact that Muslims are insane and would KILL over such trivialities as publishing a picture of their “prophet.” Yes, it got two people killed—but these were the RIGHT people. People who CAME to kill, and who did not have the right to breathe the air on this Earth. Some people complain about that, but they're STUPID.

“FOX LET HER TALK”: So Fox gets the blame. The rest of the liberal media lets people like her talk all the time, and does not go back and correct the record when her lies are found out. At least Fox had the grace to reverse themselves and apologize for letting her mislead everybody and maybe get a lot of people hurt to support Obama's drive to get a race war started. There have been 50 shootings in Baltimore, since the riots “ended,” but nobody in the media noticed.

“FAITH CRIMES”: All over the world, Christians are murdered, tortured, beheaded, raped, kidnapped and sold into slavery. Overseas, it is all being done by Muslims. But a lesser form of it is being practiced by liberals in the United States, itself under the GUISE of “gay marriage.” Another way to discriminate against Christians is to stop allowing SYMBOLS of Christianity to be displayed, after a complaint from ONE person, usually a gay or a Muslim. The main problem here is that Christians ARE a “peaceful religion,” and bear the violence that comes from Muslims with peace, which just empowers Muslims to more violence.

.

Who the Hell CARES?

We (not me) go out of our way to avoid “offending” Muslims. Why? What do we care what Muslims think? We IGNORE Muslim-owned bakeries refusing to bake cakes for Christians generally and gays especially while RUINING Christians who do the same, for the same reasons. And it's all because Muslims don't like it. Who cares? They certainly don't care if they offend US in the countries they control! They make LAWS against the things we hold dear, and prohibit us from even practicing our religion there.

“SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN HIS CAR”: That's what the family of the killer of one cop said about him getting killed by their family member. Which tells me the entire family are thugs, as much as the killer is. “Should have stayed in his car?” What a STUPID statement THAT is! Staying in his car would not be doing his job, and that fool should not have killed him. If HE hadn't been committing a crime, the cop wouldn't have pursued him. That works both way, fools!

WAS BIN LADEN MURDERED? I don't know, and I don't care. However he died, it was a good thing. This man was at the top of the list of worse than animals who didn't have the right to breathe the air on this Earth. Seymour Hersh is now saying there was “no firefight,” and they went in with the intent to kill bin Laden, and just SHOT him. I don't know if that's true or not, but it makes no difference to me. Considering the thousands—maybe MILLIONS of innocent people whose deaths he is responsible for, he doesn't DESERVE to live.

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? No, I'm not channeling Hillary Clinton. I'm merely commenting on the mother of the thug who killed two cops in Mississippi saying her son was a “drug addict” as an “excuse” for shooting and killing those two cops. Being a drug addict is NOT a defense to such a crime. I believe he felt “motivated” by the rhetoric of Obama and other cop-hating politicians. She also says he “has mental problems” since being hit in the head with a pipe a few years ago. I guess she's trying to keep him from getting the death penalty, a fate to which he is definitely entitled.

SORRY FOR THE VICTIMS: The mother of the surviving Boston Bomber says he's “sorry for the victims” of his bombings. Really? Maybe he should have thought of that BEFORE he bombed them, huh? Frankly, I don't think he's sorry for a MINUTE about the victims. I think he's sorry he's now facing the death penalty or life in prison for his crime. He's only SAYING he “feels sorry for the victims” to get sympathy and maybe avoid being put to death himself. It really amazes me when such as him tries to get sympathy from the stupid liberals out there.

THUGS ARE COMPLAINING: There is only $25 mllion dollars' worth of property for us to destroy in the next riot. It's like the thugs in Ferguson, MO, complaining that people they burned out haven't rebuilt so they could burn them out AGAIN! What? do they think people are STUPID as they are? They'll rebuild (if they're able) after these stupid thugs are gone. They're getting tired of the CRIMINALS running things where they live and they're going to “wait them out.”

.

Absolutely! Yes!

They're still asking if I would go to a restaurant where they allow guns. My answer is, I would NOT patronize a restaurant that had declared itself a “gun-free zone” because that would be one of the most dangerous environments around. “Free shooters” SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” where they can be pretty sure there will be no guns to be used against them while they're shooting the restaurant up. I wouldn't want to be there when it happened, so I stay away.

“WON'T BE THERE”: The new Saudi king has told Obma he “won't be there” when Obama holds his “Camp David Meeting” on American-Arab relations because he just doesn't trust him. So there's no reason to be there. And kings don't have to “bow down” to “King Obama.” This new king is showing signs of much intelligence. So Obama better watch out. He won't be easily conned.

MICHELLE IS NASTY! Every time I see a picture of her, she's snarling. It think she's letting her position as “First Lady” go to her head. As a black woman, she got used to being a “second class citizen” in her youth and now she's older, she thinks being the president's wife puts her above others, black AND white, She shows it by her efforts to control the lives of so many people and by displaying her anti-white racism. Her demeanor, and what she does, would not be tolerated in a black or white “First Lady.”

“WHITE ONLY” GUY CAVES” The guy who was going to sponsor a “White Appreciation Day” in his restaurant by giving white people a 10% discount has “caved” to black pressure, as I predicted he would. Now somebody needs to do the same for blacks and watch as NOTHING happens. That's the way it is in America, today. Anything special for white people drops with a thump because of pressure. Something special for black people never makes a ripple. That's what today's racism amounts to. Discrimination against WHITE people.

INVADING IRAQ: Liberals call it an “unnecessary war” because “The Iraqis had nothing to do with 9/11.” They didn't? How stupid ARE people to ignore the “airplane fuselage mockup” in Iraq that was used to TRAIN people in how to use an airplane the way the 9/11 terrorists did? Or the millions of dollars Saddam gave to terrorists to finance their depredations while giving them “safe harbor” for training and resting between “missions?” No, Iraq wasn't DIRECTLY involved in 9/11. But it was VERY MUCH INVOLVED, INDIRECTLY. Anybody who can't see that is not too bright.

AM I A RACIST? Because of a couple of items above, some (most) liberals will twist what I said to make believe I am a racist, in a futile attempt to reduce the effectiveness of my words. Nothing could be further from the truth. I judge people as INDIVIDUALS, and I judge BOTH Obamas as “anti-white racists.” Not because of their color, but because of what they SAY about white people, and DO to them. She has used her new-found power to do all she can to make life difficult for white people while ACCUSING white people of racism at every opportunity. Obama himself is doing his level best to START an anti-white race war for his own purposes.

.