Defective Thinking

More and more corporate entities are putting their customers’ lives at risk by banning legally-carried guns from their premises. Walgreen’s Drugs is one of those, and by so doing, have made pretty sure that law-abiding people won’t bring their guns with them, even if they are legally-licensed to do so—which, in itself is a violation of the “shall not be infringed” clause in the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. That reminds me of the time a woman who was licensed to carry in Texas had to leave her gun in her car to go into a restaurant with her mom and dad, and had to watch while they were brutally murdered by a gunman who predictably didn’t obey that law that forced her to do so.

PARENTS FAVOR ARMED TEACHERS: No, not FORCING teachers to arm themselves, ALLOWING them to bring their already legally-carried guns to work with them, so as to be able to defend their students in case some crazed gunman comes in with his legal or illegally-owned gun and decides to kill a few children. Liberals always oppose the real solutions to problems that are recommended by others, and almost all liberals are anti-gun fools. Liberals try to convince us there are more than two sexes, and that men can menstruate. Both impossibilities; but that never stops a liberal from trying to FORCE us to accept their silly notions as “fact,” or vilifying us if we disagree.

GUN LAWS MISGUIDED: They don’t stop criminals and other law breakers from getting guns. They never have, in spite of the fact that misguided politicians rush to make more of them every time some fool misuses a gun. Every law against gun ownership for law-abiding people ASSUMES that the law-abiding are the problem in “gun crime.” They are NOT. It is the CRIMINALS who are the problem, and no amount of anti-gun laws are going to stop them from their “gun crime.” If they are contemplating a much more serious crime like robbery or even a mass shooting, why in HELL would they give a moment’s worry over breaking a silly little law that say they can’t be armed when committing their other crimes?

MUST BE NICE: It must be nice to be a subjectivist. Then you can imagine things as you wish they were, and think it’s real. That’s how it is with the anti-gun fools. They haven’t passed a single law that actually DID something about “gun crime,” but now they’re claiming victory because they’ve managed to get a bunch of stupid laws that do NOTHING passed, in spite of the works of those who KNOW their laws are stupid and ineffective. They say the shooting in Florida at Stoneman High School “galvanized” the anti-gun nuts to make even more useless, ineffective laws against guns (they didn’t put it exactly that way, but that’s how it is to those of us with some degree of INTELLIGENCE).

GUN GRABBERS HATE IT: Great Britain has some of the stiffest anti-gun laws going outside of pure dictatorships, which ban guns totally, except for “government agents” of one sort or another. Yet guns are still “pouring into the UK,” in spite of all of their laws. Just as they do in communist China, which is one of those dictatorships. At the same time, in places where concealed carry is allowed in the United States, crime is DOWN. Especially “gun crime.” The anti-gun fools ignore such things because they do not push forward their faulty agenda. Instead, they include defensive shootings with legal guns in their figures about “gun crime.”

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Somebody’s talking about “the defense of heterosexual men who refuse to date transsexual women.” Who needs to be “defended” for not wanting to date ANYBODY? If I don’t want to date somebody, whatever their sexual preference, that’s MY business. No one else’s. I don’t need anybody’s “permission” to date anybody, or to NOT date somebody. The same applies to everybody… Dumocrats are flabbergasted. Trump did something Obama couldn’t do. What’s surprising about that? Trump has done many things Obama couldn’t do. That list is very long… Both Barack and Michelle Obama think they’re smarter than anybody they’ve ever met. Which, to me, is evidence only that their ego far exceeds their intelligence… The Dumocrats are criticizing President Trump for paying Stormy Daniels off with his own money, when more than 200 Dumocrats paid their women off with taxpayer money. That’s a big crock…

.