Wednesday, December 19, 2018

They're Against Effective Measures

That’s the “gun control lobby.” They propose many things they CALL “common sense” gun laws that are not common sense at all, since they don’t work worth a damn to keep ILLEGAL gun owners from their crimes. Not one single anti-gun law has EVER stopped a single shooter from killing people, whether or not he has his gun or guns legally. Meanwhile, they oppose proven methods to reduce gun crime, out of hand, because they don’t agree with them. ALLOWING (not requiring) teachers an other school staff who are LICENSED to carry their guns, to bring them to school with them, so they will not be defenseless when some loony bin comes in to kill a bunch of students is an EFFECTIVE deterrent, but they won’t even entertain the idea.

WHAT ARE THEY THINKING? I lust don’t understand the thinking of the anti-gun fools when they insist on making laws and regulations they KNOW don’t work worth a damn to “keep guns our of the hands of those who shouldn’t have them.” Their very first law, the “background check,” only affects the law-abiding when they buy guns, and do NOTHING about the millions of guns held by CRIMINALS, who don’t obey ANY laws, let alone one that says they can’t be armed when they commit their other crimes. Same is true with their “gun-free zones” that only keep the law-abiding from bringing their legally-carried guns there, making them “easy targets” for criminals, who don’t obey any laws.

ARKANSAS TEACHERS ARMED: In Arkansas, they apparently realize the reality that the best defense against a mass shooter is an armed school staff member that shooter can’t identify (not a uniformed “resource officer”), and they have ALLOWED teachers and other school staff to qualify to bring their legally-carried guns to school. The number so far is small, but it is growing, of school staff members who have undergone special training and mental evaluation so as to be ALLOWED to be armed, so as to protect their students. And lo, none of them have shot a student, or anybody else over a trifle.

SHE SHOT HER HUSBAND: Advice for angry husbands: When you set out to strangle your wife to death, make sure she doesn’t have a gun. The husband in this story didn’t do that, and now he’s dead, instead of her. Ian Mastin thought he had the right to beat and choke his wife, and had done it many times. Although she had not complained before, she had ample evidence of his brutality, and she definitely feared he would finally kill her this time. So she probably won’t be charged in his death, since in Louisiana, you are entitled to kill in self defense if you fear your life is at risk.

ACTING “BOLDLY AND DECISIVELY”: The Dumocrats, basking their newfound power in the House, promise to “act boldly and decisively on new gun laws.” Never mind they don’t work worth a damn to reduce gun crime. They want to pass even more USELESS gun laws that only make it easier for the bad guys to victimize the good guys by DISARMING the good guys. That this causes many deaths of innocent people doesn’t seem to bother them. They just want to keep on making these laws, in spite of the fact that they are not only INEFFECTIVE, they PROMOTE gun crime.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Former FBI Director Comey actually had the temerity to say openly that he probably “wouldn’t have gotten away with it” when he “sent a couple of guys” to interview Gen. Michael Flynn without letting him know it was an “official interrogation,” so as to trick him into incriminating himself without an attorney present in a “more organized administration.” It happened FOUR DAYS into the Trump administration. Before there was any chance at getting organizedComey should be punished for having his men advise Flynn he “didn’t need a lawyer present” for that fateful interrogation, which is an OBVIOUS violation of Flynn’s rights. When they did that, they went on to destroy Flynn’s life in all ways possible… Nothing ever happens quickly in DC. General Flynn, who was to be sentenced to whatever the other day, now will not e sentenced for another three months “to give him time to further cooperate with Mueller.” So it is “drawn out,” again… 

No comments:

Post a Comment