Another Gun Control Failure

In California, where some of the stiffest anti-gun laws in the country are in force, gun crime should be almost non-existent, right? WRONG! Gun crime in California is UP 18%! No longer is Chicago, and other liberal-run cities our only “showcases” for gun control failure. This proves, yet again, that those “tight anti-gun laws” do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime,” and in fact, INCREASE it by disarming honest people so the criminals, with their illegal guns, can more easily victimize them. As they say in this article, this provides a “target-rich environment” for criminals who want to be pretty sure nobody will be able to shoot back when they attack.

“TRUMP HAD A TEMPER TANTRUM”: That’s what the Dumocrats who attended a meeting in the Oval Office said as they left the office. What ACTUALLY happened is that President Trump “took them to school” about border control and national security. The ideas they presented would do NOTHING to improve either border security or national security, while Trump insisted on his ideas that are PROVEN winners. That’s what they define as “having a tantrum.” They weren’t too happy that President Trump opened the meeting to television cameras because that made it harder for them to twist things in their favor. They walked in there, expecting Trump to surrender. It didn’t happen. He laid out what was going to happen, whether or not they agreed.

IGNORING THE GOOD: The Washington Post ran a story headlined.”Trump condemned China over hacking and economic espionage, escalating tensions between superpowers.” Meanwhile I couldn’t find a single mention of the fact that China “blinked” in the so-called, “tariff war” by reducing their tariff on automobiles from 40% to 15%. They might mention it later, but I guarantee they will “play it down.” They don’t want to publicize ANY trump success, anywhere. Cutting tariffs on automobiles is a major concession, which we got, in spite of the “tensions between superpowers.” Trump has had many successes in all his negotiations, with everybody. But did you hear about them? Doubtful.

“THE SECOND DOESN’T APPLY”: The National Association of Colored People” (NAACP) says, “Events show the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to colored people.” Really! People have tried, many times, to say the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to this, or that group, but it doesn’t alter the fact that the Constitution itself, does not mention whether or not people can be excluded from coverage on the basis of the color of their skin. It says, “ALL the people.” All the people INCLUDED those whose skin is a darker color. Yes, it has been shown that the largest number of shooting deaths are black men, killed by back men. That does not mean that ALL black men should be excluded fro being armed for self defense, under the Constitution.

IT’S ABOUT CONTROL: The Anti-gun fools keep saying that “gun control is all about gun safety.” It is NOT. It’s about CONTROL. The ability for a nameless, faceless bureaucrat you don’t know, and may never meet, to say you can, or cannot buy and use a gun for self defense against the millions of ILLEGAL guns that are out there, in the hands of criminals and other miscreants. The power to CONTROL who may have a gun is the power to say “NO.” And more often than not, that’s what they say, while people are dying because they have no defense against those illegally-held guns. I have become convinced that the ultimate purpose of the anti-gun fools is the abolition of self defense as a human right.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Students at the University of Southern California (USC) were asked what they thought of the United States. They said they didn’t like it, and one said she was just waiting for it to be “burned down.” Maybe we should deport such fools to the “other country” of their choice, and see how they like it. Especially since there is no better country out there. None that have progressed as much as America has, in a relatively short time… Voter fraud in N. Carolina has put the election of Republican Mark Harris “in limbo.” Hmmm—why is that this never happens when it’s a Dumocrat? Even when voter fraud is proven. It’s a wonder… Michele Obama just can’t understand why people elected a “misogynist” over Hillary, who was “eminently qualified.” First of all, Trump is only a misogynist in her fevered mind. Second, Hillary is no more “eminently qualified” to be president than is Michele. Neither are qualified, just by being the wives of failed presidents… Yes, Hillary was a senator and secretary of state (both “given” her to “groom” her for her presidential run) but as Benghazi shows, she was an incompetent, in at least one of those positions, probably in both, if you examine her record as senator…

..