"Bring In the Popcorn!"

The Dumocrat Party primaries are going to be a real circus this time. They were pretty dull last time, since the only “serious” candidate they had was Hillary, and she lost. Back then, it was the Republicans who put on a circus with something like 17 candidates, all of whom lost to now President Trump. This time it is going to be the Dumocrats who field so many candidates they need a bigger stage for all the debates to hold them all. You can tell when a political party is “out of it” when so many candidates emerge. If the party had their stuff together there would only be one serious candidate on their side.

LIBERAL STUPIDITIES: Women’s College in Massachusetts rejects women’s symbol as being “offensive”; American University Yoga Group disbands over complaints of cultural appropriation; University of Iowa exempts race-based clubs from discrimination rules to provide safe space; Clemson University prof thinks human extinction will save the planet; free speech advocacy files suit against University of Texas; Duke University student leaves Facebook after complaints of “offensive posts”; Washington State stocks MEN’S bathrooms with free menstrual products. These, and many more, but no room to list them all.

YES, THEY DID IT: The question was, will Dumocrats close the government to deny President Trump his wall? Even though they have many times in the past stated their SUPPORT of a wall on our Southern border? The answer is, YES! They are more interested in blocking anything President Trump wants, if they can manage it. And since specific funding for his wall requires nine Dumocrat votes, they did manage it. What stops President Trump from just using the “discretionary funds” to finance his wall, I don’t know. there’s a lot of money there, in that fund, and it can be used, at his “discretion.” There are many things a president can do “at his discretion,” and I don’t think building a wall is out of the question.

THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the very definition of insanity. So why do the anti-gun fools do it? There is not a single law, now on the books, that has ever stopped, or even slowed down “gun crime.” So why do they insist on continuing to make them? Are they INSANE? Or just STUPID? Example: “gun-free zones.” Criminals SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” in which to do their “dirty work” because they can be pretty sure the law-a biding (their intended victims) will not be armed, and thus will be DEFENSELESS against their ILLEGAL guns. Background checks allow for catching the shooter AFTER he commits a crime. Other laws are just as ineffective. So why do they keep making them?

TODAY'S GUN SAVE: In Wayne County, W. VA, some people claiming to have presents tried to enter Jerrica Little’s home. She knew something was wrong when the woman who told her she has qualified for some free presents couldn’t tell her from whom they came, and a scruffy man in bib coveralls got out of their van looking menacing. Jerrica shut her door and told the woman she had a gun and was calling 9/11. They got back in their van and left. Just the fear that she actually had a gun frightened them off, from what could have been a “home invasion” attack. These things happen millions of times a year, but the anti-gun fools still deny it.Which just shows (again) how important it is that law-abiding citizens be armed.

IT’S ALWAYS TRUMP’S FAULT: Yes, President Trump did create the safety commission after the killings at Marjory Stoneman High School. But when Trump’s Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos, was asked if guns would be a subject, she rightly replied, “Not necessarily.”For that, the Washington Post is criticizing her. Never mind the unalterable fact that no amount of gun control has EVER stopped a single mass shooter from killing his victims. Those “black children” to which they refer are mostly teens up to 19 and are gang members, who are ALL illegally armed because they’re too young to buy a gun legally, anyway.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: What is it these days that politicians go out of their way to “not offend Muslims?” Now Canadians want to make CHRISTMAS (a Christian holiday) “less Christian” to avoid “offending Muslims?” Why the hell SHOULD we worry about offending Muslims, who are the most “offended group” ever seen? I don’t think we should worry at all about what Muslims think about what WE do… Peelosi and Schumer wanted to exclude the media from that fateful Oval Office meeting because they didn’t really want the “transparency” they claim to revere… During Obama’s “reign,” it was figured that we would always be dependent on foreign oil. That we could never again become an “exporter” of oil. But after less than two years under Trump, we have BECOME an exporter of oil… Prosecuting a whistleblower: David Daledien tried to expose the arrogant murders under Planned Parenthood, and he is being prosecuted for it. I never thought I’d ever see the government prosecuting somebody for trying to expose a murderous crime…

.