In spite of Obstacles

Donald Trump is used to people throwing obstacles in his path and still being able to attain his goals. So it doesn’t really bother him that Dumocrats oppose his every move, while he attains every goal he sets for himself. He announced his intent to run for the presidency and Dumocrats scoffed. “He doesn’t have a chance!” they said, and went on with their effort to elect Hillary if they had to cheat to do it. So now Trump is president, and they determined to place every “roadblock” they could in his way. But Trump is used to that, and he “rolled right over them” and created the best economy this nation has seen in decades.

USING THE LEFT’S PLAYBOOK: And it is making them dirty their drawers. They sponsored “sanctuary cities” all over the country where liberal city governments declared themselves “above the law” and would not help ICE in their lawful efforts to enforce immigration law. They said it was okay to refuse to follow the law. Then pro-gun people declared “gun sanctuary cities (and counties) where they would not enforce those UNCONSTITUTIONAL gun confiscation laws, and anti-gun fools lost their minds. The Virginia AG even came right out and “ruled” that they MUST obey those laws, because it “is the law.” But it isn’t. If ANY LAW violates the Constitution, it is NO LAW.

“NOBODY’S ABOVE THE LAW!” That’s the favorite refrain by liberals (Dumocrats) to denigrate President Trump. But they can’t seem to come up with anything REAL of which to accuse him. They’re disparaging him for trying to get the Ukrainian government to investigate Hunter Biden, saying it’s only a ploy to help himself to be re-elected. What is not said is that he doesn’t NEED such a thing to defeat Hunter’s father. Joe Biden doesn’t have a “snowball’s chance in hell” of beating Trump. They say a political candidate should not be a subject for investigation. On the contrary, a political candidate against whom there is real evidence SHOULD be investigated.

CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION: Many liberals have talked about changing the Constitution to better allow them to usurp our rights. They want to change, or eliminate the First, and the Second Amendments. Some want to change other tenets, but these are the major ones. These Amendments need to remain the same. To amend, or eliminate the would allow a despot to “take over” and do as he/she pleases with us. What I propose is a change to eliminate one of the serious mistakes the Founders made when they wrote it. What my suggested change does is apply a PENALTY to legislatures and legislatures, at whatever level, if they make, or even TRY to make changes and pass laws that do not conform to the Constitution.

GUN CONTROL IS FOOLISH: Why am I writing this again? Gun control, as written, is a damned fool action. It does not do what it is advertised to do, and only violates the Second Amendment rights of innocent people, leaving the field open to those law-breakers who ignore such laws and victimize the innocent. I have to keep writing this over and over again because when I do, like the gun laws themselves, I am ignored by the gun-grabbers in their zeal to disarm all Americans, for whatever reason. They DO work the way the politicians wish they would work. They do reduce the possibility that those politicians’ minions will run into a gun when they come to take our property under color of law.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Imagine! Peelosi says she wants “a fair trial” in the Senate for Dumocrats after consistently denying President Trump any degree of fairness in her “impeachment process,” I believe she knows how shoddy her impeachment is and just wants to hold it over Trump’s head as long as she can… The biggest political lie of this century so far is the liberals declaring, without evidence, Trump to be a “danger” to democracy… A Muslim Imam counseled Muslims to kill Jews and was “suspended” for a month. That’ll show him! I have to laugh at Muslims with their open Jew hatred moaning about themselves being subjected to “religious oppression.” Maybe some Muslims don’t hate Jews, but Jew hatred seems to be so much a part of their “religious teachings” that it must be hard for them NOT to hate them. Of course, they hate all other religions equally. I don’t call any group that almost universally calls for the DEATH of one people or another a religion…

.