Typical Gun Grabber Lie

“A good guy with a gun is a fantasy.” That’s what the anti-gun fools tell us. Except that fantasy happens millions of times a year, for real, in the USA alone. The anti-gun fools just can’t understand how telling such an easily refuted lie makes everything they say doubtful. They tell such lies all the time. Like “Anti-gun laws save lives.” They do NOT, and that’s another easily-debunked lie. But they aren’t smart enough to realize how destructive to their purpose telling these lies are. They “tweak” numbers in “surveys” to suit themselves, and put out lies, hoping to convince people of things that do not exist.

LAW-ABIDING MASS KILLER: You heard me right. This is not satire. That mass killer at Virginia Beach obeyed every anti-gun law there was. He was a black man, and a former member of the National Guard. He obeyed the law scrupulously—right up to the moment he began killing people. That Virginia Beach municipal building even had an elevated entrance, to prevent car bomb attacks. Liberals will probably criticize people who criticize him because he’s “a person of color.” Thus again proving that anti-gun laws are USELESS to prevent such attacks. Something that seems to escape the thinking of the anti-gun fools, who just want to continue making their silly, useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws.

GUN-FREE ZONES KILL: One of the anti-gun fools’ favorite things is the “gun-free zone.” Apparently they just haven’t the intelligence to understand that ALL mass shootings occur IN “gun-free zones.” Not only that, the gun-free zone is a favorite place for robbers and killers to “ply their trade.” I’ve come to the conclusion that they couldn’t care less if their laws get people killed. What they want to do is destroy the very concept of self defense, altogether. And anti-gun laws are the path to that end. Further evidence is that the cops routinely take away any guns that are used in self defense, and want to define ANYTHING that can be used for self defense as a weapon, so they can take that away.

TRUMP WINS AGAIN! He has accomplished something various presidents have been trying, and failing to do for 20 years: get Mexico to actually obey their own laws and HELP stop illegal immigration into the United States. The Dumocrats are not happy. They are accusing him of “being a bully” for threatening tariffs on Mexican goods if they didn’t capitulate. I guess we’re not supposed to do something real if it “makes somebody feel bad.” There is nothing good Trump does they can’t “spin” into something bad. They are much more interested in their Trump hatred than they are in doing something good for this country.

CAN’T DO IT ONE WAY: So do it another way. That’s what the anti-gun fools think, anyway. They haven’t been able to get lawmakers to violate the Constitution by just BANNING guns altogether, so they approach it fro a different direction, entirely. They are now working to ban ammunition, which has no constitutional protection (they think), to make the guns we have useless. In reality (where they do not live), banning ammunition IS banning guns and so, IS unconstitutional. If you can’t get ammunition, your “freedom to be armed” is moot. Thus, banning ammunition is an “abridgment” of our constitutional right to arms.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: People are talking about “the odd timing” of Biden accusations. Actually, it’s perfect timing to accomplish its aims, to keep Biden from getting the Dumocrat nomination, and that is as planned… Imbecilic demands: House Dumocrats want “oversight” over Fox News editorial decisions. In other words, they want to CONTROL what Fox says about their crimes. Like they’re ever going to get it. Hey Dumocrats! That’s unconstitutional… You can always depend on liberals to tell you what hurts them the most. Usually by efforts to BAN it. Now a CNN host (who shall remain nameless to avoid giving her publicity) is saying “lock her up!” is “hate speech” and wants the phrase banned, flying in the face of the existence of the first Amendment. People saying that must really hurt liberals… At least one liberal has gone all the way “round the bend.” He now believes that the very concept of TIME is racist…

.