Beating A Dead Horse

Again. I’ve used this very headline before, but nobody seems to have noticed. But that’s what the anti-gun fools and their dupes are doing: beating the dead horse of gun control. Gun control has never worked to limit gun crime as promised. It has only made it worse. They keep making their favorite laws, creating “gun-free zones” using the idea that making a law against bringing guns into certain areas will keep those who wish to use guns for evil purposes out. Meanwhile, criminals and potential mass murderers SEEK OUT gun-free zones in which to commit their atrocities because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding people there will not be armed, and thus will be defenseless.

DESTROYING ACHIEVEMENT: Liberals (and Dumocrats) want to destroy all symbols of achievement, right along with achievement, itself. “The rich” have achieved well for the most part, and that makes them “the enemy” to liberals. Now a damned fool “professor” wants to eliminate giving students grades for their work. He calls that “capitalism in action.” What kind of fuzzy thinking leads him to that conclusion, I don’t know. But it’s similar to those fools who want to eliminate keeping score in sports. Imagine an auto race where the winner would get the same pay as the guy who finished 36^th. With no score, and no winners, what the hell is the point?

POLICE IGNORE DANGER: They do that on a regular basis. They take any excuse to avoid investigation when a potential mass killer gives advance evidence of his probable anti-social actions that may lead to a mass shooting. In one case a man who gave evidence he, as a Muslim, hated America and thought Americans should be killed, then went out and killed a few on a military base where he had previously been employed as a “counselor.” In this case, the shooter’s own mother “OUTED” him to the cops because she was worried when he bought an “assault-style” rifle. She was worried that he had bought that rifle because she knew him to be a vocal white supremacist, and not too stable in his thinking.

NO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE: There is “no conclusive evidence that ‘Red Flag Laws” work. But there is conclusive evidence that they do NOT work, that is being ignored, as legislators all over the country rush to make them in the wake of mass shootings that most likely were NOT done by somebody legally owning the weapons they used. This is nothing more than “gun control panic” being displayed by legislators who are being “shamed” by anti-gun fools who should know better into passing more of them. Guns are taken away from people because somebody in their neighborhood thinks they will be a danger to themselves or others—or just has something against them.

“SHOT IN THE BACK!” That’s the claim from demonstrators, who are demonstrating because the cops “shot a teenager” who was reaching for his own gun when being confronted by the cops in a robbery investigation. He is known to the cops, and was out on bail for THREE felonies, including sexual assault on a child by a person in a position of trust, according to the records. One of the things often ignored by the liberal media in cases like this is the possibility that this “teenager” was a gang member. They ignore it because the liberal media is “anti-gun,” and they want to promote events like this to advance their narrative. Later evidence will tell if this kid was “shot in the back,” but that won’t likely convince those “demonstrators.”

ONE MAN’S OPINION: After Trump’s promise to “end Iran” if they threatened us again, they threatened us again, with a “crushing response” if we attacked them. I don’t know how they figure they’re capable of a “crushing response” to America, but they’re welcome to their deluded belief that they are the equal or better than America in war. I agree with Trump that if they do, it will be their END. We’re not going to end them for threatening us, but we will if they attack us… MSNBC’s Joe Scarboro says Buttface—er, Buttigieg is “the future of the Dumocrat Party.” If that’s so, they don’t have much of a future… The House wants to force Trump’s attorney to testify to what they talked about. Haven’t they heard of attorney/client privilege? They don’t know you can’t force an attorney to violate it…

.