One wonders why “gun control” is so unsuccessful in
“reducing gun crime.” But not if you’re intelligent. Anti-gun
fools apparently erroneously think that criminals only operate using
LEGAL guns and, that banning legal guns will “solve the problem.”
To intelligent people, this is stupid. Another fallacy is thinking
that all you have to do is pass a law against guns and THAT will
solve the gun crime problem. It will not. That has been proven time
after time, every day. you’d think those fools would learn from
their mistakes, but they apparently do not. They keep demanding we
pass more and more of those useless laws every time a “gun crime”
occurs.
BLOCKING
AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW: They tried to pass laws that were clearly
unconstitutional against gun ownership in New Jersey, and we didn’t
have to wait until the Supreme Court got around to acting to get rid
of them. A local judge declared them unconstitutional and blocked the
City of Pittsburgh from enforcing them. In so doing, he prevented the
damage that would inevitably be done illegally by those laws being
enforced until the Supreme
Court declared them unconstitutional. It’s common for lawmakers to
make clearly unconstitutional laws and enforce them until the Supreme
Court acts, which sometimes takes a long time.
A
WIN IN MONTANA: In Montana they did what should be done routinely all
over the country. The state Supreme Court
struck down an unconstitutional law passed in Missoula to limit gun
ownership and use early
in the process.
Such laws are patently unconstitutional and should be struck down
routinely. But unfortunately, they are not. The Constitution states
clearly that “the right of the people to bear arms shall
not be infringed.”
Such laws infringe on that right and, according to the Constitution,
are not laws, at all. But they are often enforced until the Supreme
Court declares them unconstitutional.
ANTI-GUN
HYSTERIA: It’s as if any gun is a living thing, an instrument of
evil, never
to be spoken of, by
anti-gun fools, and sometimes people who CLAIM to be gun experts. In
one case, the military called a bunch of soldiers together for a
“briefing.” They were taught many different ways to keep their
identities as soldiers a secret, including such things as never doing
the same thing twice, so nobody could predict what you might do, at
any given time. But there was one thing that was suspiciously missing
from the “briefing.” Mention of being armed when off base. When
asked why that was, the “briefer” replied with that age-old
anti-gun saw, that you’d be more likely to shoot yourself than a
criminal. This was being told to a bunch of SOLDIERS, who were well
trained in gun use, by an instructor who WAS armed, off base.
BACK
TO THE SIXTIES: A recent Washington
Post
article thinks the way to “gun safety” is to revert to the loose
gun laws of the sixties where you could buy a gun through the mail
without any problem. They might be onto something there. Of course,
like most anti-gun fools, the writer thinks the idea that the
government guarantees you the right to be armed for self defense is a
“NRA construct.” It is NOT. The Second Amendment says clearly,
that “[T]he
right of the people to keep and bear arms
shall not be infringed.” That’s not something the NRA dreamed up,
but it IS something they fully support, and fight for, in spite of
the ignorant brayings of the anti-gun fools.
ONE
MAN’S OPINION:
The
headline said, “Famous actor threatens Trump’s life.” I don’t
know how “famous” he is, and he isn’t much of an actor, either.
But he needs to be “sweated” by the Secret Service for shooting
his mouth off, if nothing else… Tom
Arnold’s biggest claim to fame is being once married to a fat
comedienne, who doesn’t show me much, either… Comedienne
Kathy Griffith isn’t getting work, and she’s blaming “old white
guys” for it. No Kathy, the person responsible is a goofy-looking
redhead who thought it was funny to post a photo with a phony Trump severed
head… NY
Gov. Cuomo thinks any Dumocrat who doesn’t support his ignorant gun
control measures should not be running. What makes him think he knows
so much? It’s mostly arrogance coupled with ignorance, coupled with arrogance…
.
No comments:
Post a Comment