"Republicans Are Unhinged"

That’s what Dumocrats tell us, while Dumocrats can only stand by demonstrating their uncontrollable rage over the accomplishments President Trump is enjoying. They tell us they’re frightened of Republicans while they go about setting fires and knocking “MAGA hats” off people’s heads, creating riots to keep people with whom they do not agree from making speeches, screaming in their faces and licking their phones. Then there are the ones who walk up to conservatives and punch them in the face, then run away. Liberals (Dumocrats) are well known for accusing their “enemies” of the very things they are, themselves, actually DOING, and this is the most obvious.

“TRUMP’S A THREAT”: That’s what many Dumocrats say, and at least ONE Republican. Joe Walsh, nominally a Republican who acts like a dedicated Dumocrat, dropped his bid for the presidency immediately after discovering there was NO market for his type of Republicanism. In Iowa, where Trump got 98%, he only got 1%. That must have been a real revelation to him. He fervently thought he had a chance, as do most Dumocrats. They SAY Trumps a threat, but they can’t say why, except for a few policies of Trump’s with which they don’t agree. They have no evidence of corruption on his part, while there is ample evidence of corruption on the Dumocrat side, which is ignored.

IGNORANT LIBERAL JUDGES: U.S. District Court Judge William Young issued a 47-page ruling saying AR-15s and large-capacity magazines are not protected by the 2nd amendment. Where he gets that is beyond my imagination. Maybe he looked into his crystal ball. Where, in the Constitution, does it say WHICH GUNS are, or are not covered by the Second Amendment? The Second clearly says, “[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” What part of that says that certain guns should be exempt from the Amendment? Nowhere is there a definition in the Second Amendment as to which “arms” shall be included, and which shall NOT be included.

DEMS WON’T ACCEPT IT: When it doesn’t go their way, as most things have not, recently, in their efforts to reverse the results of the 2016 election that put a non-politician in the White House—somebody they can’t control because he just doesn’t need the money they can move in his direction, therefore he can do what HE wants, not what they want. First they tried to convince the world Trump was a “Russian asset,” and they appointed a “special prosecutor” who found NOTHING. Then they tried impeachment, without ANY CRIME, and NO PROOF of any corruption, and lost. But they will not accept the acquittal because it didn’t go their way, as usual. Some Dumocrats are even saying President Trump was not acquitted.

AGAIN AND AGAIN! The Dumocrats couldn’t lynch Trump with impeachment because he wasn’t guilty of even the feeble “charges” they brought against him—with no proof of any wrongdoing among them, so they lost, and lost BIG when the Senate found him innocent. Of course, Nancy Peelosi refuses to accept that decision and says, “Trump didn’t really get acquitted.” Yes Nancy, he did. Whether you like it, or not. You don’t control the Senate like you do the house, where those accusations began. So now they’re going to go back to that old, discredited opposition to Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation, which they lost, too.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Barbara Streisand says “Pencil Neck” Adam Schiff would make a good president. Damn, is this woman STUPID! Schiff wouldn’t make a good garbage man… Joe Scarborough says Jimmy carter’s economy was better than Trump’s. What PLANET is this man living on? He can’t be serious… Failed Georgia governor candidate who still thinks she wuz robbed” thinks she will be president before 2020. Boy, is this broad deluded… Buttgiggle says, “Pro-lifers don’t belong in the Dumocrat Party.” So he favors murdering small babies before they’re even born, does he? That should eliminate him from ANY consideration, but it’s tragic that it doesn’t… CNN Tweeted that Trump will not admit wrongdoing or apologize after acquittal. And why the hell SHOULD he? He’s not guilty of anything…

.