2nd Amendment NOT Outdated!

There are many among anti-gun fools who think the Second Amendment is an “anachronism and outdated.” They say things are different today, and such an amendment is no longer needed. They’re WRONG. Yes, things are different. The government, which was not “flush with money” like they are today thought of ALL THE PEOPLE as being subject to “call up” into an “organized militia” if needed, and they wanted them to bring their own guns. But the basic reason for that amendment is self defense. Intelligent people know that the way to self defense is NOT to make yourself defenseless and beg an aggressor not to kill you. If you do, they WILL kill you.

A WASTE OF TIME: The Congress is “apologizing” to Iran for the killing of terrorist “general” Soleimani by passing a NON-BINDING resolution saying they “didn’t approve” of President Trump’s action in having him killed. This, of course, sends a message to Iran that there MIGHT be enough opposition to Trump’s acts to allow them to kill a few more Americans. It actually gives them hope. It empowers them, in their minds. They probably don’t understand the fact it is NON-BINDING and has no meaning. It “has no teeth.” President Trump can still do what he wants, without having to inform Congress—unless, of course, he declares all-out war on Iran, in which case he WILL go to Congress for approval.

SHE’S “FREE OF CANCER”: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg says she is now “free of cancer” after fighting it once again, for the FOURTH time. I’ve heard that before, from people now dead of cancer, which came back, after them being declared “cured.” Especially in the case of people who seem to be “cancer-prone,” as she is. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if we hear of her demise, one day soon. And her campaign against President Trump will be over. She has freely announced that she hates Trump, and is going to “stick around” as long as she can, to keep Trump from being able to appoint another conservative Justice, to stop Trump from ending the liberals’ use of the courts when they can’t get something done in Congress.

UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS: There are a plethora of unconstitutional laws being enforced daily on an unsuspecting population. This is due to a major error the Founders made in writing the Constitution by not providing a PUNISHMENT for legislators making unconstitutional laws. There needs to be a “tribunal” created before which legislators at all levels must present their proposed laws BEFORE they can be voted into law to which they must convince their proposed law CONFORMS to the Constitution. Unconstitutional laws now can be ENFORCED, sometimes for YEARS, until someone finally takes them to the supreme Court, and that Court rules—long after much damage has been done. People are ruined, money “confiscated (stolen), lives ruined, all due to a law that IS unconstitutional.

NOT JUST TO MILITIA: Anti-gun fools try to convince us that the founders only meant to guarantee gun rights to “members of an organized militia,” so they can be free to deny them to everybody else. NOT SO. The wording is clear: “the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” NOT “The right of militia members...” At the time of the writing of the Constitution, there was no such thing as an “organized militia” in existence, and the government considered ALL THE PEOPLE to be a “militia,” subject to being “called up” when needed, and they wanted them to bring their own guns with them, since they were not “flush with money” as they are, today.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: They’re asking “What’s the difference between Obama taking out bin Laden and Trump killing that Iranian general? The answer is simple. Obama had to do it against his will, to get re-elected. Trump did it as a strategic move, on his own authority… “What do we do next?” If Iran retaliates, what do we do next? We blow them out of the water, or the world, or whatever. They don’t have a chance, and they don’t know it. The “tear-stained handkerchief crowd” are SO afraid of a war with this flea trying to climb up an elephant’s leg with rape on its mind… The Senate has NOT said there will be no witnesses in the Senate trial of the impeachment fiasco. They are telling Nancy, WE will make those decisions, not you…

.