Democrat Harassment

If a local “cop shop” ever did what the Dumocrats in Congress have done to President Trump, they would be guilty of harassment. And rightly so. Why then, do the Dumocrats in congress get away with years long harassment of a sitting president? One they couldn’t beat at the polls, and are now trying to beat by harassment? They had their “lapdog,” Robert Mueller, search under every rock and crevice, trying to find something, ANYTHING they could use to unseat President Trump. He came up with NOTHING, after ruining several people by subjecting them to hours and days, weeks and months of unceasing questioning that got NOTHING. Their lawyer’s fees BROKE them, even when they could find nothing with which to charge them, which was almost always.

VIOLENT DEMOCRATS: What is there today that makes liberals (Dumocrats) think they have the right to assault anybody who doesn’t agree with their politics? Conservatives don’t assault liberals, even if they don’t agree with them. Which is always. Mostly, I think, it is the Dumocrats who encourage their acolytes to “confront” conservatives, and they translate that into approval of ASSAULTING conservatives. And the liberal media never criticizes them for their violence. Then we have today’s KKK, also known as ANTIFA, who go around assaulting conservatives while hiding behind their masks. The media, AND liberal politicians, approve of this, saying they’re “just exercising their freedom of speech” by assaulting unsuspecting conservatives.

SCHOOL SHOOTINGS THAT WEREN’T: One of the most basic things the anti-gun fools misreport is that of school shootings. They pounce on any shooting NEAR a school and report it as a “school shooting.” When they do, they include any shooting that happens within hearing of a school, and that included many gang shootings that are not connected to the schools. Some of those shootings occur blocks away from a school, but are included in the “school shootings” figures they put out.

GUN GRABBERS FAILING: Many Dumocrats are pushing gun control, and they are failing at the polls. Will this make a difference in what they push after being elected—IF they get elected, that is? I just can’t support the election of politicians who are stupid enough to think that banning guns is the way to eliminating gun violence when all it does is make it easier for law breakers to victimize the law-abiding, who OBEY those laws, even if they know they’re stupid. Each and every law they make only limits the ability of a law-abiding American to defend himself against the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there, in the hands of those who would do us ill.

“CONGRESS DOESN’T CARE:” That’s what the anti-gun fools tell us because Congress is resisting the passage of some of their useless, unenforceable, nothing anti-gun laws. Not a single one of the laws that are already in effect do ANYTHING to limit, or stop “gun crime.” Congress knows this, and that’s why they resist passing any more of that kind of law. Laws that make life easier for the users of ILLEGAL guns, who are much more likely to use them to victimize the law-abiding than are the law-abiding. They are called “law-abiding” because they ABIDE by the law, even if they think those laws are stupid, as are all the anti-gun laws. The way to self defense is NOT to disarm yourself. Congress knows this.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: The Muslim “religion” is the “fastest-growing religion in the world.” why? How many religions threaten to kill you if you don’t convert? That can have a big effect… Turkish Premier (or president, I can’t keep track) uses the New Zealand killings to condemn “hostility toward Muslims.” There wouldn’t be any “hostility against Muslims” if some extreme Muslims didn’t kill so many innocent people… Liberals are calling actually SAYING, in public, that you don’t think a MAN should be able to compete against WOMEN is “hate speech.” Which just shows again that anything we say that they don’t like is called “hate speech,” even if it’s true…

.