Dumocrats are trying to tell us there wasn't a "spy"
placed into the Trump campaign during the 2016 election. But they DO
admit there WAS an "informant" placed there. Which brings
up the question: what the hell is the difference between a spy and an
informant? A spy listens and learns, then informs his handlers what
he has learned. An informant listens and learns and then tells his
handlers what he has learned. Their jobs are IDENTICAL, so what's
the difference?
Only SEMANTICS. A spy is an informant. An informant is a spy. There
is no difference.
IT
MUST HAVE KILLED THEM: Even CNN
couldn't get out of reporting this "good guy with a gun"
story, and it must have made their headline writers shake with fury
to have to write it. The headline is: "Armed Citizen Kills
Gunman at Oklahoma City Restaurant." Writing it might have
caused them to have a nervous breakdown, I don't know. Seems like a
guy walked into a restaurant and started shooting at two women.
Whereupon a nearby citizen who was legally armed, shot him to death,
saving the lives of those girls, and who knows how many more.
CNN regularly writes that things like this don't happen. What made
them actually run this story is a mystery, because it clearly marks
them as liars. If the liberal media ever started covering these
stories, it would make an amazing story.
JUST
BAN IT! BAN IT! BAN IT! That seems to be the action of choice for the
ignorant politicians who think all they have to do is ban something
to take care of a problem. It's
political ad time these days. The
politicians screaming their stupidity is all I hear these days, and
it seems the basic theme with MOST politicians is "ban guns!"
"Ban bump stocks!" :Ban everything!"
"Ban, ban, ban!"
Or they exult that they "beat NRA!" Once.
One
little victory and they think the fight is over.
It is NOT.
"WE
MUST BAN BULLETS": The anti-gun fools have seized upon something
the "founding fathers" overlooked in writing the
Constitution. Actually
MENTIONING the
right to buy bullets. They think the Constitution doesn't give us the
right to buy bullets for our guns,
since bullets were not specifically mentioned.
Therefore, they're starting a campaign to BAN BULLETS. They're
beginning by assuming the founders didn't include bullets in their
recognition of our RIGHT to self defense, and to buy and use the
means to that end, a gun. They're pretending that, because the
founders didn't specifically MENTION bullets in their recognition of
our right to self defense. The founders never envisioned somebody so
STUPID as to think they didn't include bullets, and thought it was
unnecessary to specifically MENTION them. The Founders did not mention guns. They mentioned "arms." That INCLUDES ammunition, to intelligent people.
NO
"WILD WEST ATMOSPHERE": One of the basic claims of the
anti-gun fools is that, if the law-abiding are allowed to carry their
guns, it will "create a 'wild west atmosphere,' and blood in the
streets." They completely discount the "blood in the
streets" already out there, with shooters using their ILLEGAL
guns to shoot everybody in sight. A good illustration of that is in
Chicago, where anti-gun laws are
tight, but 23 people have already been shot over the Memorial Day
weekend (so far). The only problem is, their silly laws never work.
and they only make it worse, by DISARMING the law-abiding, making
them "sitting ducks" for the lawbreakers, who can't be
bothered to obey their laws. Update: the number of people shot over the Memorial Day weekend is (so far) 38.
ONE
MAN’S OPINION:
Is
anybody with any brains still listening to teenage bigmouth David
Hogg? His "15 minutes of fame" is way past its expiration
date, but he's still mouthing off. He's now calling for "courtesy
in speech," but he's the biggest violator
of that.... Idiocy
personified. Alec Baldwin thinks he would beat Trump soundly if he
ran in 2020. How stupid IS he? Trump would SHRED him.
It amazes me how arrogantly STUPID these anti-Trump fools are....
Liberals
gave Hillary a trophy for her "contributions to society,"
whatever THEY were. Nobody seems to know Like the one they gave a
well-known former newsman for the fake"news" that got him
fired. I guess they MAKE UP their "awards" so they can say
people are "award-winning people"....
.
No comments:
Post a Comment