If
you listen to the DC pundits (liberals all), Robert Mueller is the
epitome of integrity. If you look up integrity in the dictionary, his
picture is next to the definition of the word. But he is absolutely
NOT a "man of integrity." If he was, he would not have
stretched out his "witch hunt" for more than a year, while
ruining so many people with peripheral connections to Trump, and
taking the "investigation" far afield
while spending $millions of taxpayer dollars,
in an attempt to find
something, ANYTHING he can use to "bring Trump down." He
would have shut down his "investigation" a long time ago
when he found NO EVIDENCE of Trump collusion with the Russians in his
election, which was the ostensible reason for the investigation.
"TRUMP
CAN'T BEAT MICHELLE": That is what the Dumocrats think. And they
recently added Oprah
to that list
of people
they think can beat
Trump in the next election. They're DERANGED if they think either of
those women have a chance to even get CLOSE to Trump in an election.
If this is the best they can come up with in the way of opposition
for Trump. a second term is GUARANTEED.
Another
name being bandied about is "Ol' Joe" Biden, and he's not
much better. They "passed over" him in 2016 because they
thought he was too weak a candidate, compared to their
"front-runner," Hillary. And she got her butt whipped,
proper.
"BACKGROUND
CHECKS REALLY WORK": Yeah, right! But they don't, if the
bureaucrats running them are competent, and apparently, they are NOT.
There is no telling how many times convicted felons have LIED while
filling out their Form 4473, saying they had never been convicted of
a felony, while the bureaucrats running things "phone it in,"
and pass him without verifying. That's
what happened recently in Indiana. This guy had beat an attempted
murder rap after
stabbing his sister by claiming insanity; he had a long
"rap sheet" that included
charges of theft, robbery, and criminal recklessness. But the FBI
still passed him. He bought his gun, and not six hours later shot his landlord when he came for the rent.
FREEDOM
OF SPEECH? ABC has fired Roseanne by canceling her popular television
show after she "made a racial slur" about a political
figure. Never mind she has as much freedom of speech as does Colin
Kaepernick in the NFL, where liberals are "flailing about,"
trying to get him hired on ANY team. They SAY he was "blacklisted"
after refusing to stand for the National Anthem, but that's a LIE. He
"walked out" on his contract after the team wouldn't
approve a big salary increase after the contract was signed. A
separate thing. The "free speech" argument is moot, because
it only applies to GOVERNMENT punishment for what they say. Employers
can, and DO punish people for what they say, as Roseanne can testify. Roseanne's problem is, she was sounding a lot like a conservative/
ONLY
THE LAW-ABIDING: Anti-gun laws only do one thing: they make it easier
for the lawless to victimize the law-abiding by disarming them and
making them "easy targets" for the lawless, who just don't
bother to obey anti-gun laws. There isn't a single anti-gun law that
has EVER stopped a "gun crime" because the people their
laws are supposed to apply to, simply IGNORE them and continue to
victimize the law-abiding, who DO obey their laws. Meanwhile, the
anti-gun fools keep insisting on making ever more of their USELESS
anti-gun laws, while insulting people who point out their ignorance
and try to stop their depredations and attempts to violate the
Constitution of the United States.
ONE
MAN’S OPINION:
They
call it a summit. A summit is two IMPORTANT world leaders meeting.
Kim Jong Stupid being there
doesn't make it a summit. He isn't important enough.
But I'm sure HE thinks he is....
Accusations
without proof. The Washington Post just published a story asking
"what is Trump hiding about his health." Of course,
there's no source cited because this is just more "made-up
stuff" designed to bring his health in question with no basis in
fact.... Notable
headlines: "Dumocrats blame Trump for (fill in the blank)"...
ABC has fired Roseanne because of her "racial slur." But
liberals are still pressuring the NFL to hire Colin Kaepernick in
spite of his being the CAUSE of much diissention and lowered
attendance figures. They argue "free speech," but what
about Roseanne's freedom of speech? In any case, freedom of speech
applies ONLY to GOVERNMENT punishment for what they say, not an
employer....
.
No comments:
Post a Comment