The anti-gun fools are hollering (again) for gun
confiscation to put stop to mass shootings. Never mind gun
confiscation in America is against the Constitution, which is the
very BASIS for every law we make. Each law MUST conform to the
Constitution, or be eventually thrown out by the Supreme Court as
unconstitutional. But what if they actually got a law through in
spite of that which allowed the government to confiscate (steal)
every gun in the country (if that's even possible), and the mass
shootings continued, unabated. What would they do, then? They would
then be faced with IRREFUTABLE
evidence that their laws stop NO gun crimes. What
would they do? What would they be ABLE to do?
NEVER
LEARN FROM EXPERIENCE: The anti-gun fools never learn from
experience. Evidence abounds that
their
"gun laws" not only never even slow down "gun crime,"
it INCREASES
it. They have to know this, but they keep dragging out all their
tired,
old, useless "gun laws" and think they're new. The UK, for
instance, has an almost complete gun ban, but have suffered a 27%
INCREASE in "gun crimes." Chicago, IL has some of the
tightest gun laws in the country, coupled with probably
the HIGHEST rate of gun crime in the nation. Other cities with
similar laws also have high gun crime rates.
LIFT
ROCK, BUGS SCATTER: That's what is happening in Hollywood, right now.
Several women (finally) came forward and accused Harvey Weinstein, a
powerful Hollywood mogul, of being a "casting couch king,"
and then women from all over the Hollywood scene jumped on the
bandwagon and revealed the fact that they had been similarly sexually
abused, not only by Weinstein, but many others in positions of power,
and with the ability to promote, or hinder their careers. And the
victims were not limited to women, as many MEN came forward and told
of THEIR experiences on the casting couch.
SHE'LL
NEVER GIVE UP: If you've ever seen a horror movie, you'll note a
recurring theme. That is, on several occasions, the horror you
thought was dead, comes at the hero or heroine yet again--and
again--and again, until you begin to wonder if it can be killed. It's
like that with Hillary Clinton. We all
thought she'd just "go away and lick her wounds" after
being soundly thumped in the 2016 election she thought was "fixed"
for her to win, because it was "her turn" to be president.
Then she wrote a mistitled book, "What Happened," full of
excuses for her loss than never included her own incompetence as a
candidate.
IT
WILL ALWAYS BE: Any time the Republicans come out with a bill to
lower taxes for EVERYBODY, the Dumocrats will call it a "tax
break for the rich," without ever even READING it, so as to know
what's really in the bill. That's one of their oldest scams, and
people keep falling for it, believing the BS they're spewing. There
are other scams they use, such as the "baseline budgeting"
scam, where every agency is given a 10% INCREASE every year,
regardless of how they performed' and if it is REDUCED, by any
amount, that's called a "cut." Of course, its effectiveness
is increased by the fact that establishment Republicans also use
it.
ONE
MAN'S OPINION:
Gun-free
UK sees a 27% INCREASE in gun crime. Anti-gun fools ignore that, in
their quest to disarm all Americans and make them into "sitting
ducks" when those ILLEGAL gun users come to victimize
them....Gentleman's
Quarterly (GQ) has declared
themselves stupid. They
have named Colin Kaepernick "Citizen of the Year" because
he started the movement
in NFL to disrespect the flag and the National Anthem. something that
is costing football millions
of dollars in revenue.... It
amazes me how the Dumocrats are able to avoid reality. Former FBI
Director Comey even SAID Hillary was "guilty as sin," but
he wouldn't prosecute her because "she didn't mean it." Which is a LOAD of stinky brown stuff. Now
desperate Hillary is saying any investigation into the "Uranium
One" swindle is
"an
abuse of power"--or
words to that effect.
she's really frightened, folks....
It
amazes me the difference between sex accusations on Republicans vs.
Dumocrats. Republicans get "stomped on" by everybody, while
Dumocrats have "the wagons circled" in their defense.
Examples: Roy Moore vs.
Al Franken and Bill Clinton....
.
No comments:
Post a Comment