Come Back to Bite 'Em

One of the favorite things liberals like to do is make unproven accusations of sexual misconduct on a conservative figure, and then go on and on about it as if an accusation was true. They got rid of several prominent figures that way, including Roger Ailes, the "father" of conservative radio and TV that way. They also got the scalp of Bill O'Reilly and a few others at Fox News, and were "laughing up their sleeves" UNTIL a bunch of LIBERALS began falling to the same thing, this time often with PROOF. The names include top liberal politicians such as Al Franken and John Conyers. Now down the tubes goes Charlie Rose and Matt Lauer, both liberal newscasters. Where will it end? Two can play that game.

WHY IT DOESN'T WORK: We're talking about gun buybacks, and why they don't work. first off, criminals don't sell their tools of work. Some will sell old, unusable guns to get money to buy newer guns in better shape. Another reason is that the people who DO sell their guns to politically motivated buyers have no idea what those guns are worth. One .22 rifle turned in was worth five times what the seller got for it, and it probably ended up in some cop's gun collection by use of simple sleight-of-hand in inventorying the guns. The basic theory in these gun buybacks is that "removing guns from the street" gets rid of "gun violence" has failed to create ANY evidence that it does.

DON'T BELIEVE HIM: Kim Jung Un says his latest "intercontinental ballistic missile" can reach any part of the United States because it managed to fly a few thousand miles straight up before coming down about 600 miles away from the point of launch. Don't you BELIEVE it. He has neither the money nor the know-how to manufacture such missiles. It's all for show, to accomplish what? To "frighten" us? Actually, what it will do is very soon earn him a MOAB down his flue as we get to the "end of our rope" with his posturing and threats. And having all his launch sites and nuclear plants destroyed. Maybe he will survive, maybe not. Doubtful.

BANNING GUNS WON'T WORK: The theory pushing the anti-gun fools is that if they can get rid of ALL the guns in the world (impossible), that will cause crime to dry up. That shows a complete ignorance of how things work in the world. First, there is NO WAY they will ever get rid of all the guns in the world. Second, violent crime pre-exists guns by many years. Back when guns were non-existent, thugs found other things to use in victimizing the law-abiding. Such as swords and other kinds of knives. Swords and other bladed instruments have been used for hundreds of years to victimize people. The only real answer to guns in the hands of criminals is guns in the hands of the law abiding, so they can defend themselves.

ONE MAN'S OPINION: They say Trump is "getting blowback" from his "racist" use of the word "Pocahontas" to describe a member of Congress. No kidding? He's getting exactly what he expected--complete loss of mind on the part of the Dumocrats. He's "playing them like a fiddle." And the only thing racist about is them CALLING it racist.... I think it's about time we straightened Kim Jong Un out--for good, by blowing his missile sites and presidential palace out of existence--at night, when his underfed and dangerously unhealthy people can't stay awake.... We should stop talking about "draining the swamp." It's not a swamp. It's a "cesspool.".... Peelosi emphasized the importance of "due process" regarding John Conyers' accusations of sexual misconduct, while condemning Judge Roy Moore without any kind of "due process." Seems to me a little biased....

.