Worried About Her Shoes!

With all the important things going on in the world, I think it is instructive that liberals are having a meltdown over Melania wearing high heels on the plane to the disaster area in Texas. Who the hell CARES what she wears on her feet? She's not likely to be going out, searching for survivors or bodies. If that's all they've got to complain about, they're in big trouble. This is just more evidence that they're searching diligently for something, ANYTHING about Trump or his family to whine about.

BANNING GUNS FROM RALLIES: In West Hartford, CT, they want to make it illegal to carry a gun into a political rally because that would "destroy the First Amendment freedom of speech. Never mind the SECOND Amendment, of course. They don't agree with that one. And they really think banning guns by law from such meetings will keep the "bad guys" from bringing their guns in, anyway. In reality (which they don't understand), such a ban works right into the hands of those who want to shoot up such rallies because they can be pretty sure law-abiding people won't be armed there, and thus will be "sitting ducks."

MOMS' NEW TACK: Not every day do you hear of a scam artist "taking a new tack" in his swindle, but with anti-gun fools, it is often. AlGore did it with his so-called "global warming" swindle that wasn't working very well at the time because it was discovered by REAL climate scientists that the "globe" had NOT been warming for almost 20 years--the same period during which Gore's "the sky is falling!" rhetoric made him $BILLIONS. So he just changed its name to "climate change," so he could attribute ANY kind of unusual weather, anywhere, to his swindle. Now "MOMS Against Guns" (or something like that) is taking a new tack in their swindle. They're now calling it a "state's rights issue," thinking they'll have better luck intimidating state legislatures than they've had with Congress.

WHY WOULD THEY OPPOSE IT? This anti-gun fool says "Gun laws are common sense, and why would anybody oppose them?" Well, first of all, fool, they don't WORK. So why pass them the way they seem to be now, DEPENDING on LAWBREAKERS to OBEY them. How ANYBODY can count on a lawbreaker to obey this law when he doesn't obey any others, is a mystery to intelligent human beings. Their current anti-gun laws are NOT "common sense." They're ANYTHING but that. So making more of the same laws and expecting a different result is the very DEFINITION of insanity.

WHY WOULD THEY OPPOSE IT? This anti-gun fool says "Gun laws are common sense, and why would anybody oppose them?" Well, first of all, fool, they don't WORK. So why pass them the way they seem to be now, DEPENDING on LAWBREAKERS to OBEY them. How ANYBODY can count on a lawbreaker to obey this law when he doesn't obey any others, is a mystery to intelligent human beings. Their current anti-gun laws are NOT "common sense." They're ANYTHING but that. So making more of the same laws and expecting a different result is the very DEFINITION of insanity. When she got an e-mail request to DEFINE gun control, she couldn't, so she ignored it.

.