Surprise, surprise! Potential criminals tend to
buy their guns (those that don't just steal them) "off the
street," not from gun stores. And those who buy from gun stores
are not generally the crooks;
so why do they keep making it harder
and harder on honest,
law-abiding people to get guns to use in self defense? I don't think
they do it to
make things easier for criminals to victimize us, but that's the sum
effect of ALL their highly-touted "gun laws." And you can't
convince them of this. Are they just STUPID,
or what?
MEDICAL
EMERGENCY: Sorry,
folks. I missed a day recently. I had a medical emergency that
required TWO trips to the hospital and one to a specialist to correct
They told me it wasn't really serious, but they weren't experiencing
the pain I was. I fought to keep updating these blogs, and did it,
although I got seriously behind on my research. I'm pretty much
caught up now, and I thank you for your patience. Still, I AM 80
years old, and these things will happen. I will continue
bringing you the truth
as long as I can.
"POVERTY
AND HOPELESSNESS": That's what's at the bottom of a lot of the
"gun crime." The "authorities" recognize this,
but keep on making laws to make honest people defenseless. The most
of the "gun violence" everywhere is committed by street
gangs, many of whom RULE their areas. Even the cops, in some areas,
leave them alone unless they get way "out of control, as they
are wont to do, sometimes. In some places, they even DEFER to them,
as if they were a LEGITIMATE organization. In Sacramento, they even
want to PAY them not to kill people. Is that insane, or what? They should give me money so I won't kill anybody.
WHY
IS THERE POVERTY? In the richest country in the world, there is still
poverty. It is that, they blame for the "gun violence" and
gang activity. But why IS there poverty in a country that is the
richest in the world? Why are there pockets of poverty? The reason is
drugs. Some people get rich selling them, and others get POOR buying
them. The next thing they have to do to "support their habits"
is start stealing. They can't make enough money to support their
habits by working, and the drugs increase the tendency to do NOTHING,
rather than go out and work to improve their lot in life.
VENDETTA
AGAINST FOX: Has anybody noticed the plethora of accusations of
sexual misconduct
aimed at popular Fox News hosts in the last year or so (with NONE against CNN people)? Roger Ailes,
the top guy, was accused, and removed. The allegations were never
proven before he died in an accident in his home. Ditto
for one of his top execs. Bill
O'Reilly, at the time the top ratings-getter, was also accused, and
lost his job. Eric Bolling, likewise. Both without any kind of PROOF
of sexual misconduct,
only somebody's unsupported word.
Others were accused, and cleared. Charles Payne was similarly
accused, but cleared. Notice that all the accusations come from the
LEFT, on the RIGHT.
WHO
THE HELL CARES? Vanity
Fair
snubbed Melania Trump and that cost Graydon Carter his editor's job
there. Big thrill! Who cares if Vanity
Fair
recognizes Melania? The snub was just part of the
"Trump Derangement Syndrome," anyway. I'm sure Melania
doesn't care. She's no longer a model. She's the wife of the
President of the United States, who is a billionaire. She's so far
above this fool, it makes no difference to her. He
only did it to get headlines, and look what it accomplished.
There are always fools who come out of the woodwork to take advantage
of someone else's fame. It doesn't always work out.
CBO;
NEVER RIGHT: The Congressional Budget Office: is a useless government
agency, but one on which Congress and the rest of the government
depends, absolutely. Their job is to "advise" the
government on the economic effect of their new tax laws. If they pass
a new tax deigned to bring in one hundred billion dollars, they ask
the CBO to "score" the law, which means tell them if the
law WILL bring in one hundred billion dollars. So the CBO goes to
work and comes up with a "finding,"
Not considering the real effect the new law will have on taxpayers.
They ASSUME that ALL taxpayers will just PAY the tax, and it will
bring in one hundred million dollars--it will not.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment