Politicians know the Constitution prevents them from
simply BANNING guns, altogether. so they just make it very difficult
to OWN a gun in as many places as possible. At the same time, they
make
it as difficult as possible to SELL a gun, so maybe you'll just
"throw up your hands" and go out of the gun business
altogether, and there'll be nowhere to buy a gun. You will have a de
facto gun ban, People will have to travel out of your jurisdiction to
even BUY a gun. Meanwhile, they make laws that make even HAVING a gun
more difficult. Higher
fees and taxes, stringent reporting requirements, etc.
All this makes it harder and harder for the average citizen to have
and use a gun for self defense.
WHAT'S
THEIR PURPOSE?
The anti-gun fools will tell you their purpose is to "stem gun
violence" by getting rid of all guns. They must be stupid not to
know there is NO WAY to "get rid of all guns." The bad guys
will ALWAYS be able
to get their guns to use in victimizing the law-abiding. The simple
effect of all their "gun laws" is to INCREASE gun violence,
not reduce it. Their laws only serve to disarm the law-abiding.
So it becomes obvious (to intelligent people, at least) that their
purpose is to make it easier for the bad guys to victimize the
law-abiding--and that's exactly what they're doing. If they can't
stop people from buying guns legally altogether, they make laws to
make it harder to get the ones they do have into action fast enough
to deal with the holder of an ILLEGAL gun, or make their guns
impossible to use.
NOT
A DEMOCRAT? NJ Sen. Bob Menendez is a Democrat. The first Democrat to
be tried for corruption, ever. I guess they're better at covering up
their stinking brown stuff than Republicans. Anyway, the liberal
media goes out of its way to AVOID mentioning that he is a Democrat.
The NY
Times
published a 1,400-word article about it that only mentioned his party
once, in the fourth paragraph. NBC
even tried to falsely claim that he is a REPUBLICAN! I guess they
just can't handle a DEMOCRAT actually getting caught at corruption.
THE
BLAME
GAME:
What's wrong with Hillary? She LOST again, in an embarrassing
fashion, because she was a lousy candidate. Ever since, she has been
advancing excuse after excuse for her failure, blaming everything
there is for her failure, except the REAL cause, Hillary Clinton. Her
campaign was a desultory one, because she thought the "had it in
the bag" and only needed to "go through the motions"
of campaigning, to get elected. After she lost and overcame her
frustration, she started manufacturing excuses, beginning with the
Russians. After six months of searching, and never coming near to
finding real evidence of "Russian collusion," she started
putting out various reasons for her loss.
DEMOCRATS
LOSING IT! They're now talking about impeaching Trump for firing
Comey as FBI Director! Never mind that the president can fire ANY
federal employee he wishes, any time, for any reason, or NO reason.
They're talking about "the document" (presumably the memo
Comey wrote to himself after being canned), which isn't "evidence,"
at all. They're searching far and wide for a good reason TO impeach
Trump, and finding NOTHING. So they're making it up. They don't even
think about what they'll do about the vice-president, who will become
president if
Trump is impeached.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment