Making My Point on Guns

Liberals are making a great point of emphasizing the fact that the guns the Boston bombers were using in shooting at cops were not legally obtained. Which is exactly the point I have been making for a long time that people like these have no trouble getting the guns they use to kill innocent people and do other crimes. Gun laws, the way liberals make them, DO NOT WORK to keep guns out of the hands of criminals; only honest people.

RICHARD FALK SHOULD BE REMOVED: He is “professor emeritus” at Princeton University and a member of the UN’s Human rights Council and is STUPID. He’s not smart enough to hold those positions and be well-paid for that when he says (among other stupid things) that Bostonians “got what was coming to them.” Because of America’s policies and actions. He has been rebuked by the UN before, but needs to be REMOVED. We should remove funding for anything in which he is involved.

BLAMING AMERICA: People like Professor (emeritus) Richard Falk, member of the UN’s Human Rights Council, say “America got what it earned” (paraphrased) because they killed innocent people with their drones. “Collateral damage” is INEVITABLE in any war, and we are at war with an enemy who lives among, and plans its atrocities among Muslim neighborhoods to GUARANTEE that if they are attacked, there WILL be collateral damage We do not kill innocents willingly; Islamic terrorists DO. They’re like those who strapped innocent children to the front of their tanks when attacking.

PARENTS SAY BOMBERS WERE “SET UP”: And I’m not surprised. They’re BOTH Muslim extremists. Maybe they haven’t yet DONE any extremist actions (the parents), but if you listen to what they SAY, you will know HOW their sons became “radicalized,.” We need to go into THEIR backgrounds and find out if they HAVE ever taken part in terrorist activities. The MOTHER, especially. Other questions: did they know about the attack their sons were planning? Did they HELP in that planning AND the execution?

BOSTON BOMBERS ON WELFARE: Why? They were certainly able-bodied. Why were they ABLE to get welfare? Why are able-bodied people able to come here and immediately go on welfare and live for TEN YEARS as welfare recipients (while having enough money to visit Russia for six months)? I can's fford to do that, and I'm not on Welfare.

WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR DEFINITION OF SECOND AMENDMENT: That’s what one government official has said. Murder is up all over the world. Should we “change our definition” of MURDER? Why the HELL should we “change our definition” of the Second Amendment, except to recognize it for what it IS, supporting the right for us to HAVE guns for SELF-DEFENSE?
.