Don't Come After My E-mails!

Frankly, I’m tired of Obama assuming powers he doesn’t have. Subpoenaing e-mails and phone calls of reporters while “investigating” reporters trying to find a story IS illegal, no matter how many bureaucrats say it is “irrelevant.” That tells me it won’t be long before they come after people like me. That’s when I WILL become a criminal (by their definition) because I will NOT give it to them. First of all, I don’t keep e-mails and, if I did, I wouldn’t give them to them. If they want to put me in prison they’ll have to feed me. Meanwhile they can stick it up their tailpipe.

A METHOD TO HIS MADNESS: Obama knows when he attempts to intimidate people who donate significant amounts of money to his competition the word is going to get out. He wants it to. What better way to intimidate ALL potential donaters to other people’s campaigns and therefore reduce the amount of money his competitors can collect? The same goal is there in his new campaign against his friends in the media. Go after the reporters who try to find out info and soon they won’t work so hard, knowing they’re going to be “targeted” sooner or later.

INTIMIDATION: Now Obama’s government is bugging reporter’s e-mails and soon that will “dry up” tips given to reporters to “upset Obama’s applecart. When reporters no longer get such tips, they can hardly do their jobs. That’s one reason he is hitting Fox so hard, since they are the ONE major news source that actually tells the truth about him and his schemes. They’re making “everyday journalism” into a crime. This effectively scares other reporters into not doing likewise. The reason he went after AP is so he could claim he's going after both sides.

REMEMBER GIBSON GUITARS? Obama went after them for using the wrong wood and cost them a BUNDLE. Both in what it cost to defend themselves, AND in having to throw away thousands of dollars’ worth of wood and buy more. The owner of this company is a Republican (surprise, surprise!). Remember when a BUNCH of GM dealerships were ordered closed? They were owned by Republicans (surprise again!). And I’m sure these are just two instances of Obama’s “war on Republicans,” everywhere.

WILL OBAMA IGNORE OKLAHOMA? The governor said Obama “kept every one of his promises” to people in Connecticut after the disaster there. Then why are many people STILL without relief? Did he “get to” this governor? Why then, are his words denied by what is actually happening—or NOT happening? Is he going to promise help for Oklahoma victims, then go off on another “fund-raising (for himself) mission: somewhere else in the world, spending money that could have been used there? Why do we have a president for whom we must ask such questions?

OBAMA WELCOMES OKLAHOMA: He welcomes it because that means for a few days he won’t have to manufacture a panic or disaster to keep us “occupied” while he rapes us? He’s a great believer in Rahm Emmanuel’s theory that “You should never let a good disaster go to waste.” He’s even willing to start a scandal that, if it gets out of hand, could mean disaster for HIM, such as the IRS scandal. But he’s confident (arrogant) he can “handle it” while it becomes the “shiny thing” that occupies our attention and keeps it off Benghazi.
.