Hypocrisy Personified

Well-known anti-gun Chicago Alderman Ed Burke, who has been charged with extortion for telling Burger King that they had to send their legal business to his office to get any permits approved. And a permit application they’ve been trying to get issued for a long time was “magically” approved the same day they agreed. Now this guy has been in that office for fifty years, and actually “inherited it” from his father. Kinda like a small time king, I guess. And when they raided his office, they found that this anti-gun (for us) politician was “armed to the teeth.” They found 23 guns there. Alderman Burke is the embodiment of Chicagoland corruption, and has just been caught by the feds, not the locals or the state. Of course not. The “fix” is in. He sees to that. But it’s hard for a local politician to control the federal government. They have their own pay-off system that he was apparently not part of.

WE WILL FIND YOU: And when we do, you’re a goner. Yes, you can sneak up on a Navy ship and blow up a few sailors. Or hijack a few airplanes and kill more than 3,000 people in one strike. But from that moment on, your time on this Earth is limited. You now have an “expiration date, certain.” It is the day we find you. Like we found Osama bin Laden. That rich bastard who masterminded the destruction of the world Trade enter in 2001. Who lived in poverty while he hid from us. Or that fool who planned, and carried out, the bombing of the USS Cole. Sure, you killed a few innocent people. But we will find you. And when we do, we will kill you. As we did recently with the terrorist who masterminded the USS Cole bombing.

JUST TELL ME HOW: Anti-gun fools criticize people like me who actually see the senselessness of the laws they pass, and the impossibility of them actually DOING anything to reduce “gun crime.” They say we WANT more people to be murdered, and that’s supposed to be why we insist on retaining the constitutional RIGHT to be armed for self defense. So I want to ask them a simple question, and insist on a real answer, and not the usual name-calling in which they engage, to mask the fact that they HAVE no answer. The question is this: “Why do you insist on continuing to make laws that, in addition to NOT working to reduce “gun crime,” actually work to INCREASE it by disarming the law-abiding so they’ll be ‘easy targets’ for the law breakers?” “Why do YOU want us to be defenseless?”

NOT FOR SELF DEFENSE: Some fools are telling us a “pocket pistol” is not for self defense because it is difficult to hit a distant target with one of them. But that’s not a good reason to exclude them from your arsenal. Yes, they are not the BEST gun for self defense, but they are a good “back up” gun that can be used when you can’t get to your number one gun, and you recognize their limitations. They are DESIGNED for close-up use, and as a “last chance” measure. And if loaded with magnum ammo, can be quite devastating to an attacker who did not expect them to be there.

OBEY THE DAMNED LAW? Here’s an interesting scenario for you. You’re a law-abiding person who happens to be a “concealed carrier” and you forgot to leave your gun in the car when you went into a restaurant where it is a “gun-free zone” by law. You didn’t mean to break the law, but nobody was hurt by your forgetfulness. As you finish your “Big Boy” or “Whopper,” or whatever that particular chain calls their cheeseburgers, you hear a loud noise. You turn just in time to see the cashier fall dead from a gunshot fired by the man in front of him. You instinctively grab for your gun as he turns and aims his at you. You put one in his eye and out the back of his head before you can kill you and your family if that was his intention. Thank God you forgot and broke the law.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Politicians found that they could not have a nativity scene last Christmas in Washington, D.C. “This wasn’t for any religious reasons. They couldn’t find three wise men and a virgin.” -Jay Leno (Apologies to “Flo and Friends” reader, Yakety Sax)… MSNBC show host Joe Scarboro says “Trump is the worst president in modern times.” Of course, he doesn’t tell us on what he bases that crack, because there ISN’T anything to base it on, except his “Trump hatred syndrome.” In reality, Trump is the best thing that has happened to this country since Ronald Reagan, and that’s what liberals like Scarboro hate, because he has done many things they could not do… Liberals making big thing about the second illegal alien child who died in custody, but don’t mention the conditions under which they have traveled to get there, and the fact that, at least in the second case, the father REFUSED medical attention for the sick little boy just before he died.…

.

Why Not Admit It?

Chicago “gun crime” problems are MOSTLY street gang problems. That is obvious to intelligent people, but they won’t admit it. The University of Chicago Crime Lab researchers tell us that “gun crime” is mostly limited to “specific neighborhoods.” Those are neighborhoods infested with street gangs. They even know this, but they hesitate to SAY it. Most gun crime in any large city can be traced right back to gang violence—in addition to other kinds of “gun crime.” But anti-gun fools everywhere don’t bother to try and do something about the street gangs, whose guns are ALL illegally gotten.

PELOSI SPEAKER AGAIN: The Dumocrats did the expected, and elected Nancy Peelosi Speaker of the House—again. In spite of all her missteps that cost the Dumocrats an election they thought was FIXED for Hillary to win, so she could continue the Dumocrat’s movement toward socialism. In spite of the fact that she fostered the intense “Trump hate” campaign that has netted them NOTHING but frustration. She knows she isn’t going to be able to get anything past President Trump, even if the Dumocrats do control ONE house of Congress.

DEMOCRATS LIE AGAIN: They SAY they’re willing to compromise, but they’re not. They passed TWO bills in the House to “open back up the government,” but neither bill contained what they KNEW President Trump demanded, and has been demanding, all along—funding for his wall. They KNEW he would not accept those bills, and neither would the Senate. The Senate will not even bring it up for discussion, and they knew it wouldn’t. They are simply posturing politically and showing their irrational “Trump hatred,” which gains them NOTHING, and the results in the next election will show it, unless they can “find” enough votes to swing it in their favor.

WELCOME BACK, FOUNDATIONS: The number of “charitable foundations” has decreased significantly in recent years, especially since the tax cuts instituted by President Reagan and President Trump made them unnecessary to dodge taxes. Now Dumocrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants a top tax rate of 70% again. They were originally only used to mask income, so that they would not have to pay those “confiscatory taxes” imposed upon them by Dumocrats. Now the ones left are mostly used to mask foreign donations to politicians, a la Hillary Clinton. Dumocrats will never learn a simple fact: that REDUCING taxes causes more economic activity, and thus more taxable income, thereby causing an INCREASE in the “tax take.”

CONCEALED CARRY REDUCES CRIME: In Illinois, which was, until recently, the “last holdout” in the battle to increase the “concealed carry” numbers, finally passed a “shall issue” law to replace the “no issue” laws then in force. And crime predictably went down. Even in Chicago, where “gun crime” continues unabated (though somewhat reduced), in spite of their many tight anti-gun laws. In fact, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel disagrees, saying “shall issue” laws will INCREASE crime. This in spite of the sure numbers of crime reduction since the “shall issue” law was passed. He maintains that “gun control is still needed.”

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Liberals like to claim lies, but they are the worst liars. Judd Apatow, a Hollywood producer and a Trump hater, accused Tucker Carlson of “spewing lies and hate.” But he didn’t site any “lies or hate” other than a disagreement with him. That’s because there are none, except for those disagreements. The “lies and hate” come from Apatow’s side… Jeffery Guterman called President Trump a “sadistic bastard” for designing a wall with sharp pointed tops. If it makes harder for illegal aliens to climb over, I’m all for it. I guess I’m a “sadistic bastard,” too. I’m happy to do what it takes to foil criminals from illegally entering the United States. And they ARE criminals if they try to climb over that wall. All they have to do to avoid injury is not illegally climb that wall… Outgoing Sen. McCaskell wonders why Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez is “the thing” right now in Dumocrat politics. I can tell her why. She’s stupid. And Dumocrats recognize a “kindred spirit” who can be counted on to promote the most preposterous ideas…

.

Knife Attack In UK

So “gun crime” was getting out of hand in the UK, so they just about BANNED guns, pretty much altogether, for the law-abiding. They don’t count the law BREAKERS, who get their guns anyway. But did gun crime go down? Not so’s you’d notice it. The latest attacker, after shouting “Allah,” said, “As long as you keep bombing other cities, this kind of sh-t is going to happen.” This, of course, ignores the fact that Muslim extremists have been bombing OUR cities, and causing other kinds of attacks our bombings were in retaliation for.

PUSH CLIMATE CHANGE: That seems to be the Dumocrat’s plan: Push Hard on Climate Change.” Oh, great! They want to spend a lot of time and money on a phony issue that was started, and continues, to put money into AlGore’s pocket. They keep saying, “The science is settled,” but it is NOT. NO science is settled. New knowledge is coming along all the time that upsets many “cherished conclusions,” by destroying old opinions. In climate change’s case, no new facts are needed. Climate change is the new name Al chose for his failing “global warming” scam that was ruined by the very fact that the globe has NOT been “warming” for almost 20 years. So he changed the name of his swindle to “climate change,” so he could attribute ANY weather anomaly to it.

“COMBATING GUN VIOLENCE”: What liberals call “combating gun violence” is as much of a scam as is “climate change/global warming.” It’s based entirely on a phony premise: that you can just “make a law,” and everything will be okay. The fact that criminals and other miscreants just IGNORE those laws is just “icing on the cake.” It just gives them yet another opportunity to make more new laws that don’t work, and to create new “fees and taxes” to “help in combating gun crime.” The fight never ends, as with climate change, and the anti-gun fools continue to profit from it, while governments get to create even more taxes so they can “better fight gun crime.”

SLAP ALL TRUMP HATERS: They have it coming. Yes, I know, all politicians have people who don’t agree with them, but Trump haters carry it too far. And those in his own political party are worse. Every Trump hater that blasts Trump is a “member of the swamp,” and they’re afraid Trump will eventually get to them, so they’re “shooting first.” I know not all who disagree with Trump are “Trump haters,” and it’s easy to tell which ones are. They’re the ones who deny all the good things he has done, and criticize him for inconsequentials without having any answers themselves. Like the ones that criticize Melania about her footwear. And people like Mitt Romney, who needlessly write nasty op-eds about him.

GOT THE RIGHT IDEA: The commission investigating the Marjory Stoneman HS killings is recommending that teachers be armed. Wow! Politicians with intelligence! Whoda thunkit? I’ve been telling them that for a long time, but most politicians just ignore me. Their minds are made up, so don’t confuse them with facts. I’m not advocating FORCING teachers and other school staff to be armed. I am merely saying we should allow those who are already “concealed carriers” to bring their guns to school with them so they can act to protect their students, and maybe themselves, as well. If we could find more people with intelligence to work in these committees, and the legislatures, we might begin to get a handle on “gun crime.”

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Hillary says, “2018 was a dark time for our country.” which is all part of the Dumocrats “bad-mouthing” a good economy because they didn’t accomplish it. President Trump did it after Obama said it was “never coming back” because he didn’t know how to do it… John Brennan says he hopes the GOP will abandon Trump in 2020. that’ll be the day, with the economy going at full steam, and with more money in their pockets… I shudder when I watch the many Dumocrats announcing their intention to run against President Trump, and see the fools smiling who welcome them… Jose Canseco has announced he is running for president on the Dumocrat ticket. I think Micky Mouse or Goofy will announce next… Kentucky cops in mourning after a Krispy Kreme truck caught fire and burned up. All the donuts were lost. “Overcooked,” I guess…

.

Democrats Are Stupid!

That’s the only thing I can think of to explain most of their plans for the next Congress. All their plans are stupid, but the stupidest are their plans to increase their efforts at gun control, in opposition to the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. The Constitution clearly states that no law shall be made that “INFRINGES” on the right of ALL AMERICANS to be armed for self defense. Yet they spend most of their time hatching and passing many laws, each one of which DOES “infringe” on that right.

TWO CHILDREN DEAD: The liberal media is making a “big thing” out of those two children (so far) who have died “while in US custody,” completely ignoring the fact they both died after only a very short time in our “custody.” Which means, of course, to those of us with INTELLIGENCE anyway, that they died, not from our treatment of them, but from something that happened to them ON THEIR TRIP. Not from their treatment in our custody. The liberal media is doing their usual thing, blaming President Trump for everything bad that happens, any time, whether or not it IS his fault.

DEATHS PREVENTED? “MOMS against Guns (or something like that) is “celebrating success” in 2018 because they got a lot of their anti-gun laws passed. But I have one question for them: “Can you show me ONE DEATH that was prevented by ANY of your anti-gun laws?” It’s a question they can’t answer, not because you can’t prove a negative, but because not a single one of their laws prevented a single gun death. They INCREASED them, in fact, by DISARMING the law-abiding, leaving the way clear for the law breakers, who obey NO LAWS. That is the fatal flaw in their thinking: that making a law will keep a criminal or other “bad guy” from buying a gun illegally, or just stealing one.

EMPHASIZING THE NEGATIVE: That’s what the Dumocrats are doing, with the able assistance of the liberal media. They’re running stories right now telling us all about how the stock market reached record lows recently, ignoring the fact that it reached many record HIGHS before it “went low” for a while. They never tell you that the general direction in the stock market is UP, and sometimes dips, TEMPORARILY. That all other indicators are UP, including employment, manufacturing, money kept by citizens, and the like. That we are in the middle of the best economy for a long time, in the overall.

BAN CARS! BAN CARS! That’s what the liberals are going to be shouting after they hear the news that cars have been driven into people in TWO places: Germany, and Japan. In Tokyo, a minivan slammed into New Year’s revelers, injuring eight people, while the same thing occurred in Berlin. In Tokyo, the driver wasn’t finished. He jumped out of the van and punched a ninth victim. In Germany, he did it twice (then again). He drove int a crowd in one place, but his intended victims jumped out of the way and were not hit. Not satisfied, he drove to another location and did it again, this time injuring four. He wasn’t a very good terrorist, and neither was the one in Japan. Neither has killed anyone (yet).

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Disgraced former FBI Director and Dumocrat toady Jim Comey did it again. He LIED to Congress when he told them the “Steele Dossier” was paid for by Republicans, which is a PROVABLE lie. Will he be punished for it? Probably not, He IS a Dumocrat, after all… After griping about not being accepted to any college, teenage anti-gun fool David Hogg has now been accepted to Harvard. It’s amazing what a little manufactured notoriety will do… “Mad Max(ine)” Waters says, “We must get rid of ‘despicable’ Donald Trump.” In reality, we must “get rid of despicable Maxine Waters” before she bursts a blood vessel in her brain—if she has one… Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants free college for all, and for the rich to be taxed until they’re poor. But she belittles the minuscule (compared to the national budget, and the cost of her wishes) $5.7 billion Trump wants for something to aid in border control. This fool has not a clue what she’s doing, and now she has the authority do to her stupid things…

.

Pelosi Won Anyway

Nancy Peelosi worked hard to get elected Speaker in the new 2019 Congress. Yet nobody is a worse choice to be Speaker. She “presided” over the big Dumocrat LOSS in the 2016 election that got Donald Trump elected president, in spite of all their “fixing” things in many ways to get Hillary elected. First of all, they only allowed ONE politician to oppose HIllary in the primaries, and he is an ADMITTED socialist—something a majority of Americans rightfully scorn. To add to that, they fixed things so that, no matter how many primaries he WON, she always came away with more delegates. Then during the election itself, none of their vote-stealing schemes were able to get her close enough to Trump so they could “put her over the top.” And they’re supposed to let her do it again? Still she won, and is the first former Speaker to get the gavel again. Which shows a certain lack of intelligence among Dumocrats.

DEFLECTING THE BLAME: The headline reads: “Trump Tries to Deflect the Blame for Migrant Children’s Deaths.” Which, of course, makes it sound like Trump IS to blame—which he is NOT. Those children could NOT have died so soon after being in custody UNLESS there were things that were wrong with them, and ignored, for a long time before they were ever in custody. There is NO WAY Trump, or anybody else in our government, could possibly be responsible for those children’s deaths. That headline is DESIGNED to make Trump look like he’s to blame, when he is NOT. This is how the fake news boys operate. They write the headlines to ASSUME Trump’s responsible for anything bad, and let nature take it’s course.

ALL I GOT WAS… “The government shut down and all I got was a bunch of crap.” The media gave President Trump a bunch of crap for not visiting the troops on Christmas, at the same time his airplane was landing in Iraq, with he and his wife aboard. So instead of recognizing their error and apologizing they spent the next few days “nit-picking” the visit. They falsely claimed that Trump signing MAGA hats was against the rules. They criticized Melania’s choice of footwear. Both things of little or NO importance. Next, they’ll resurrect their claim that President Trump always gets TWO scoops of ice cream while the troops will only get one.

THEY WON’T HEAR OF IT: The anti-gun fools are being told in many places that the BEST way to “reduce gun crime” is to allow the law-abiding to have their own guns to use in defending themselves against the millions of illegally-owned guns there are out there in the hands of criminals and other miscreants. But they consistently deny that solution in favor of their plethora of useless, INEFFECTIVE “anti-gun laws” that do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime.” You ask them why they continue to support these useless laws and they never answer because there IS no cogent answer. So they just start immediately calling you names, hoping to divert you into defending yourself against those names.

IT TOOK AN “INVESTIGATION?” CNN did an “investigation" (I don’t know how many dollars they spent in their “investigation”) and “discovered” what we already know: “criminals don’t obey laws.” I’ve been telling them that, all along, but they refuse to believe me, in favor of their preconceived notions that all they have to do to “reduce gun crime” is to pass a law, and, magically, all the lawbreakers will obey it. When are these people going to wake up and realize that the ONLY real solution to the “gun crime problem” is to arm the law-abiding, so they can defend themselves against the law breakers, who obey no laws?

ONE MAN’S OPINION: It’s against the law to lie to the FBI, but apparently not for the FBI to lie to their victims. It ought to go both ways. But with liberals running things, it never will… Why is it okay for Muslims to mock Christian beliefs, but not okay to say anything bad about Muslims? Incoming Dumocrat representative (Muslim) Ilhan Omar mocked VP Pence’s Christian beliefs, and nobody said a word (except me). She’ll probably call me racist for that. That’s what Dumocrats always do when criticized… Every day I see more and more Muslims in elected positions. What’s WRONG with the voters? Don’t they know every Muslim in an elected position is one less person there who thinks the way WE do? No, that’s not racism. It is common sense not to want Muslims imposing their wishes on the rest of us. Next, they’ll be making laws requiring women to wear hijabs, and that will just be the start…

.

Defective Thinking

More and more corporate entities are putting their customers’ lives at risk by banning legally-carried guns from their premises. Walgreen’s Drugs is one of those, and by so doing, have made pretty sure that law-abiding people won’t bring their guns with them, even if they are legally-licensed to do so—which, in itself is a violation of the “shall not be infringed” clause in the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. That reminds me of the time a woman who was licensed to carry in Texas had to leave her gun in her car to go into a restaurant with her mom and dad, and had to watch while they were brutally murdered by a gunman who predictably didn’t obey that law that forced her to do so.

PARENTS FAVOR ARMED TEACHERS: No, not FORCING teachers to arm themselves, ALLOWING them to bring their already legally-carried guns to work with them, so as to be able to defend their students in case some crazed gunman comes in with his legal or illegally-owned gun and decides to kill a few children. Liberals always oppose the real solutions to problems that are recommended by others, and almost all liberals are anti-gun fools. Liberals try to convince us there are more than two sexes, and that men can menstruate. Both impossibilities; but that never stops a liberal from trying to FORCE us to accept their silly notions as “fact,” or vilifying us if we disagree.

GUN LAWS MISGUIDED: They don’t stop criminals and other law breakers from getting guns. They never have, in spite of the fact that misguided politicians rush to make more of them every time some fool misuses a gun. Every law against gun ownership for law-abiding people ASSUMES that the law-abiding are the problem in “gun crime.” They are NOT. It is the CRIMINALS who are the problem, and no amount of anti-gun laws are going to stop them from their “gun crime.” If they are contemplating a much more serious crime like robbery or even a mass shooting, why in HELL would they give a moment’s worry over breaking a silly little law that say they can’t be armed when committing their other crimes?

MUST BE NICE: It must be nice to be a subjectivist. Then you can imagine things as you wish they were, and think it’s real. That’s how it is with the anti-gun fools. They haven’t passed a single law that actually DID something about “gun crime,” but now they’re claiming victory because they’ve managed to get a bunch of stupid laws that do NOTHING passed, in spite of the works of those who KNOW their laws are stupid and ineffective. They say the shooting in Florida at Stoneman High School “galvanized” the anti-gun nuts to make even more useless, ineffective laws against guns (they didn’t put it exactly that way, but that’s how it is to those of us with some degree of INTELLIGENCE).

GUN GRABBERS HATE IT: Great Britain has some of the stiffest anti-gun laws going outside of pure dictatorships, which ban guns totally, except for “government agents” of one sort or another. Yet guns are still “pouring into the UK,” in spite of all of their laws. Just as they do in communist China, which is one of those dictatorships. At the same time, in places where concealed carry is allowed in the United States, crime is DOWN. Especially “gun crime.” The anti-gun fools ignore such things because they do not push forward their faulty agenda. Instead, they include defensive shootings with legal guns in their figures about “gun crime.”

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Somebody’s talking about “the defense of heterosexual men who refuse to date transsexual women.” Who needs to be “defended” for not wanting to date ANYBODY? If I don’t want to date somebody, whatever their sexual preference, that’s MY business. No one else’s. I don’t need anybody’s “permission” to date anybody, or to NOT date somebody. The same applies to everybody… Dumocrats are flabbergasted. Trump did something Obama couldn’t do. What’s surprising about that? Trump has done many things Obama couldn’t do. That list is very long… Both Barack and Michelle Obama think they’re smarter than anybody they’ve ever met. Which, to me, is evidence only that their ego far exceeds their intelligence… The Dumocrats are criticizing President Trump for paying Stormy Daniels off with his own money, when more than 200 Dumocrats paid their women off with taxpayer money. That’s a big crock…

.

Subjective Laws

Politicians love subjective laws because they are so vague they may be defined in any way that politician wishes. Take “bump stock bans,” for instance. With the advent of the bump stock ban, ANY rifle can be made into a “machine gun.” all it takes is for some unnamed, faceless bureaucrat to DEFINE it as such, and its owner suddenly becomes a law breaker, just for owning it. They love to make laws as wide and vague as possible so they may be used indiscriminately, just by somebody DEFINING something as being whatever is banned.

THEY WERE FOR IT: Now they’re against it. Dumocrats have said many times that they wish to have an effective border wall (or barrier, or fence, whatever they call it) UNTIL President Trump said he wanted it. Then the Dumocrats made such a fast “turnaround” it’s a wonder they didn’t break their own necks. Now they’re working hard to block ANY effort to build the wall, even to the extent they’re having yet another “government closing.” They’ve long known President Trump was going to insist on funding for his wall—the wall he PROMISED as one of the main planks in his campaign—and now they’re “holding the taxpayer up” by refusing to fund his wall and allowing the government to close down (partially) because of their refusal.

OCASIO-CORTEZ BOTCHES IT AGAIN! Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has again proven that she not only doesn’t know anything, she thinks she’s the smartest person in the room. She is a “cartoon image” of a politician who somehow got herself elected to the House by ill-informed, really fact-challenged liberals in liberal New York. Now she’s botched the story of Jesus’ birth, and the reason why he was “born in a manger.” His father Joseph was NOT a “refugee.” He was simply following the law by going to Bethlehem to be “taxed,” by order of the Emperor. He was only in the manger because there were no rooms available at the inn, which he could have well afforded, were they available.

THERE IS RUSSIAN COLLUSION: But not what the Dumocrats want you to think. There is NO provable collusion with the Russians on the part of the Trump campaign. They spent the better part of two years, and more than $20 million dollars of taxpayer’s hard-earned money to search under every rock and crevice to find that evidence, and have found not a shred of such evidence. Believe me, if it existed, they would have found it, But the only thing they have done is the ruination of several good men, simply because they once worked for President Trump in one way or another. Meanwhile, they have IGNORED completely PROVABLE evidence of collusion with foreign governments by the DUMOCRATS.

GUNS AREN’T THE PROBLEM: Every time some fool goes out and starts killing a bunch of people in a crowd, or even just one person, with a gun, the anti-gun fools start screaming for yet more “anti-gun laws.” And when anybody opposes them, they vilify them, saying they “wish for more people to be killed.” But I have one question to ask them: “What would you like us to do, that will WORK? Since none of your highly touted anti-gun laws have EVER stopped a single shooting? Just tell me something that will WORK, and I’ll be all for it.” Unfortunately, they have never come up with a single thing that will actually reduce “gun crime,” as we know it. And they won’t, because there IS nothing they can do, no law they can make, that will work, because the gun is NOT the problem.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: People who intended to be illegal immigrants are now demanding $50,000.00 EACH to go home. I’d tell them to go pee up a rope… Dumocrats confidently predict that President Trump will go to prison. Some even actually say somebody has proved him to be a felon. Unfortunately, no such proof exists, except in their fevered minds… I look at the people who are so “desperate” to get into this country that they stuff their toddlers into holes dug under the border fence and note that most of them seem to be pretty well fed. They don’t look all that desperate, to me… The incoming New York State Attorney General says she is going to use the “total power of the state” to “get” Donald Trump. Good. That will show the world just how powerless is that state when they find out they can’t make a dent in Trump, as has everybody else who tried… Loretta Lynch says she wants to “bring Trump down” as her top priority. Who the hell does she think she is? She has her own “devils” to repel, beginning with that meeting with Bill Clinton while his wife was being investigated by her people. It’s just more sour grapes…

.