The anti-gun fools have been trying hard for years to
“get a hook” into the NRA they could use to destroy it, and take
away one of the strongest organizations in opposition to their
unconstitutional attempts to disarm all Americans (except, of course,
the criminals, who don’t give a damn about their silly little
anti-gun laws). Criminals, of course, LIKE anti-gun laws, because it
keeps the law-abiding, who are their favorite victims, from
being armed, and able to defend themselves against the ILLEGAL guns I
their possession. Now they think they’ve got one, and are working
hard to make the wound bigger.
DISARMING
AMERICA: I just can’t understand the thinking of the anti-gun
fools. It is obvious to intelligent people that, when a criminal
threatens you with his illegal gun, being disarmed is
NOT
the way to go. Disarming the law-abiding is the best way to get them
killed, as 8 people (in including two “moms” who were standing up
for “stopping gun crime” without gun control) found out in “gun
controlled” Chicago recently. They were killed in a "drive-by" shooting. They have to know that the ONLY
answer to “gun crime” is to allow the law-abiding to be armed, so
they can defend themselves. But NO! These “paragons of smart”
just won’t hear of that. They just want to take away our guns, and
that’s it. Their minds are made up, so don’t confuse them with
facts.
PROTECTING
YOU WITH SIGNS: There are signs posted in many places saying,
“Gun-Free Zone. No Guns Allowed!” And that’s supposed to stop
people from bringing their guns into that “zone.” It does. The
law-abiding, that is, but they are not the problem. The problem is
presented
by the criminals and mass killers, who couldn’t be less concerned
with their signs. They PREFER to do their dirty work in gun-free
zones, because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding will not be
armed there, and will thus be unable to defend themselves. The
concept of a gun-free zone is just plain stupidity. And pro-gun
people like me have been telling the anti-gun fools that for years,
presenting unalterable truth to prove it. And
we have been ignored by the “wizards of smart” who think banning
guns will stop gun crime.
DEMOCRAT
TOTAL STUPIDITY: Michael Moore, that fat fool, is now telling us
that, “Only Michelle Obama can save us from 4 more years of Trump.”
What complete stupidity that reveals! They tried it with the wife of
one president, and it didn’t work. So they want to try it again
with the wife of another
clearly FAILED president. I really doubt Michelle is even smart
enough to be president. She’d probably have a panic attack at the
first crisis because she wouldn’t have any idea of what to do. Not
even mentioned is that the Dumocrat’s socialist dream would add
even more responsibilities to the job. Dumocrats are famous for doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result. The very definition of insanity.
TRUMP
WON BOTH DEBATES: Dumocrats are declaring the “winners” in both
Dumocrat debates, but they ignore the fact that NONE of the Dumocrats
really won. The clear winner is President Donald Trump. The Dumocrats
pointed out some of the major drawbacks to electing other Dumocrats,
and those other Dumocrats pointed out the problems with the first
Dumocrats. They tore each other apart. At least those who have a
chance of winning the nomination, and the rest just don’t matter.
And with each revelation of insanity in Dumocrat positions, Trump’s
ability to get re-elected to a second term increases—as if his
victory depended on that.
ONE
MAN’S OPINION:
Former
Secretary of State John Kerry wanted Israel to “meet the
Palestinians halfway.” Only trouble is, what they want is the DEATH
of all Jews. Letting them kill half of them is not going to get it…
Fired
former FBI Director James Comey says Trump “could face indictment
after he leaves office.” But for WHAT? There is nothing out there
for which he COULD be indicted, unless liberals make something up. I
just wonder why they bother to listen to anything this disgraced fool
says. He's a good prospect for prosecution, himself… Remember
that big guy who thought he was a gal who broke four weight lifting
records competing against women? Several men have done the same
(competed against women), but this is the first one I’ve seen who
got the titles taken away when “wiser heads” prevailed, and the
records stricken from the record books…
.
No comments:
Post a Comment