Anti-Gun Fools Lie

They tell us that anti-gun laws in other countries that do not have a Second Amendment have “STOPPED gun crime in its tracks.” Only one problem. It’s usually a LIE. Look at Australia, for example. "After the 1966 Port Arthur mass shooting with its 39 dead, Australia made strict gun control laws and hasn’t had a mass shooting since." That’s what the anti-gun fools tell us, anyway, and it’s a LIE. Using the FBI definition of a mass shooting as one in which 3 or more people are killed in a single event, the Hunt family murders in 2014 qualify. The husband killed his wife and three children with a gun. Then there was the Wright St. Bikie murders. Those were the result of a biker feud.

SWAMP PROTECTS ITSELF: Congress has secretly made rules and laws simply to protect itself, and maintain its members in power for DECADES, in spite of bad conduct. One of those things was the “slush fund” Congress quietly set up, using taxpayer money, to pay off women who told of members’ sexual misconduct and keep them quiet. They have schemed and scammed to make sure most members win election after election while the fiction of opposition to them is maintained, so they can have a lifetime job in Congress, and continue to get paid handsomely after they leave office..

THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID: It’s either that, or they have some ulterior motive in all their anti-gun fool efforts. They have to know their fool laws don’t work. They don’t stop a single instance of gun violence. All they do is disarm the law-abiding, who OBEY laws, while making it easier for the law breakers, who do NOT obey laws, to victimize the law-abiding. How this is supposed to “end gun violence” is a mystery to me, and I’m getting very tired of writing the same words over and over again, and being ignored. Gun buybacks, for instance. People bring in old, useless guns, and get money to buy newer, useful guns. “Gun-free zones?” They are a MAGNET for law breakers to come in and shoot people in a place where the bad guys can be petty sure the law-abiding will not be armed, and able to defend themselves. While the law breakers routinely bring their guns.

IT IS A CRISIS! Many politicians, most of them Dumocrats, say what is happening at our southern border is NOT a crisis. Which completely ignores the fact that it is a planned invasion, using innocent people who simply want to improve themselves. It’s hard to refuse such people, but we must, or be overwhelmed with “immigrants,” who want to bypass those who tried it the legal way and are still waiting to be admitted. When tens of thousands of people, every day, try and enter the United States any way they can, climbing over fences, tearing down fences, slipping in hiding under cars, etc., it IS a “crisis.”

NEW ZEALANDERS SURRENDER GUNS: There are 1.2 million guns in NZ. Right after the government demanded people “turn in their guns” in response to the killing of a bunch of Muslims in Christchurch, 37 people complied. The rest of that 1.2 million yawned. Just as an aside: It must be hard for Muslims to live in a place called “Christchurch.” I’m surprised they haven’t demanded a name change. That sounds like something they’d do. The NZ prime minister says they must turn in their guns to “make the community a safer place.” How she figures that is in question, since most of those 1.2 million guns in NZ are illegal, and only the law-abiding would bother to answer that ridiculous demand.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Rush Limbaugh said it: “Where were the 29 storm troopers, armed to the teeth with automatic weapons, raiding Jussie Smollett’s apartment, at dawn? Why wasn’t Smollett forced to stand out in the cold in his underwear? Or maybe a real crime isn’t as important as was the arrest of a former Trump associate who may, or may not have committed a “process crime.” The double standard is obvious, here. But will not be noticed by the “powers that be”… They’re saying (again) that Mueller’s “snipe hunt” may be nearing an end, and liberals are all excited. But it happened,and they are very disappointed that he wasn’t able to find evidence of Russian collusion...  Former VP Biden is demanding PROOF. Something not required when the politician accused of sexual impropriety is a Republican…

.