The anti-gun fools are throwing everything they can think of “up
against the wall to see if it will stick.” ANYTHING to limit your
right to own and use a gun for self defense. Now, in Washington
state, they want a “literacy test” you have to pass in order to
buy a gun (Don't liberals hate literacy tests?). That’s IN ADDITION to all the other limitations that
state has put on those who simply want to have a gun to use against
the MILLIONS of ILLEGAL guns already
out there in the hands of criminals and other bad guys. Different
states have come up with many ideas to limit access and usage of
guns, without actually BANNING them, since that is prohibited in the
Constitution, the basis for ALL our laws.
“WATER
IS WET”: That might as well be a headline in the news. Another
would be, “Getting Shot Hurts!” It damned sure DOES! But some
people just need to be shown, by experience. Which is why some people
actually allow themselves to be shot, just to find out for
themselves. Usually while wearing a bullet-proof vest, but it
still hurts—a lot. Which is why cops who get shot while wearing one
still get
taken to the hospital. Their injuries are not as bad as they would be
without that vest, but they will be bad enough. Broken bones, and
deep tissue damage, for instance. It is people like those who allow
themselves to be shot to prove a point that give the anti-gun fools
fodder for their claims that law-abiding gun owners are stupid, and,
if allowed to carry a gun, will “go bananas” and “shoot up the
landscape.”
PROVING
YOUR GUILT: Dumocrats think that not only does an UNPROVEN accusation
of sexual impropriety by a woman need to be believed, in spite of the
fact that there have been many cases, proven, where women have
claimed sexual impropriety to “get back at” a man for some
slight, real or imagined. Accusations
of sexual impropriety have become a WEAPON to be used against men, by
women, and by politicians, BECAUSE no proof seems to be required.
Additionally, Dumocrats
seem to think that DEFENDING YOURSELF against such attacks “proves
your guilt!” Which is what they have said about former judge, now
Justice Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh has won that fight, but the Dumocrats
will never stop “accusing” him of “dastardly deeds,” hoping
something will stick. Then they hope to impeach him.
STILL
FOR IMPEACHMENT: Dumocrats have signaled their intention to pursue
impeachment for newly minted Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett
Kavanaugh. For WHAT? Based on that scurrilous “accusation”
WITHOUT PROOF of any kind that he (almost) raped a young girl when he
was 17? An accusation the accuser herself is not sure of, even though
she claims she IS sure it was him. She isn’t sure of anything else,
but she claims she is “crystal clear” that it was Kavanaugh who
(almost) raped her that fateful night. I think she has been PAID to
accuse him, and that the incident she claims never happened. The
timing of the accusation was just too convenient. Too pat. And with
NO PROOF, definitely NOT grounds for impeachment of a Supreme Court
Justice.
NRA
TAKES VICTORY LAP: The NRA congratulates Kavanaugh on his successful
appointment to the Supreme Court. This can only be a good thing for
“gun control,” which is a misnomer. There is no “controlling
guns.” Only LEGAL guns. The laws the anti-gun fools have made only
apply to the law-abiding, and NEVER to the lawbreakers, who ARE the
problem. Kavanaugh will always rule, based on the Constitution, not
on his own personal views and opinions, and especially not on his
political views. That will be a disaster for liberals, most of whom
are anti-gun fools, who keep insisting on making USELESS laws that
accomplish NOTHING.
ONE
MAN’S OPINION: Mad
Max(ine) Waters thinks it is okay to harass Trump staffers and other
people like senators who agree with him. So I guess it’s time to
start harassing HER whenever she goes to a public restaurant. See how
she likes it… I
thought the Dumocrats had reached the bottom of the barrel. Until I
heard about the new accuser’s claim that Kavanaugh was present at
“rape room” parties where women were fed raw alcohol to make them
drunk so the guys could screw them. Again with NO PROOF… I
notice the timing of each “accusation” in the Kavanaugh case
comes closer and closer to the scheduled vote on Kavanaugh’s
appointment to the Supreme Court. While Dumocrats scream for the vote
to be put off “until the latest accusation can be investigated. But we won, and they lost…
Lying again, I see.
Christine Ford has an extensive history of air flight, yet one of her
excuses was a “fear of flying.” that’s a lie, like all the
others she has told, beginning with the “fact” she is “100%
certain it was Kavanaugh who (almost) raped me,” even if she was
blind drunk at the time…
.
No comments:
Post a Comment