"Gun Nuts Are Terrorists"

That’s what one (Dumocrat, of course) anti-gun fool in Tennessee says, anyway. He’s referring to those of us who wish to retain the constitutional RIGHT to own and use a gun for self defense, against those who IGNORE all their short-sighted laws that only make life easier for criminals to victimize the law-abiding. He says nothing about those who routinely IGNORE their silly laws and get their guns ILLEGALLY. Those are the ones who are closer to being “terrorists,” not the law-abiding, who OBEY their stupid laws. This wildly “out there” politician is trying to paint himself as a “moderate,” something that most Dumocrats do, and then they work to pass some of the most extreme laws ever while still claiming to be “moderate.” And they think we believe that crap.

“SHOW ME THE PROOF”: Melania Trump shut down the assumption that accusations, unsupported by evidence, is all liberals need to cite about Trump’s supposed “infidelity.” She also shot down all the Kavanaugh accusers with the same comment: “If you want to accuse, show the evidence.” It’s a simple comment, but goes to the core of the liberal scheme of accusing their enemies of foul, dastardly deeds, with NO KIND OF PROOF. Then they cite those accusations as if the mere accusation was evidence of guilt. This is one of their most recent scams, and they almost succeeded with now Justice Kavanaugh.

BOO HOO! POOR LIBERALS! Liberals loved Kayne West when he “knocked” President Bush, and spouted their phony lines. But now that he has expressed admiration for their “arch enemy,” President Trump, they hate him, and they have responded with the most hateful rhetoric possible. Rhetoric that would be called racist if anybody but a liberal spouted it. They say that, “Like most Negroes, he doesn’t read,” without any knowledge of his reading habits. And they called him “The token negro of the Trump administration.” All because he revealed opinions with which they do not agree.

SELECTIVE MEMORY: At least it seems that way when Dumocrats talk about how the Republican leadership “broke the Senate.” They seem to forget all the times THEY “broke the Senate” I the past—or they fervently hope YOU will forget all their LIES in the past, present, and future. The former aide to former Senate Majority leader (at the time) Harry Reid wrote an Op-Ed saying current Majority Leader Mitch McConnell “broke the Senate and hurt the country.” Which completely ignores what Reid did when we tried to get a latino judge confirmed.

CRIMINALIZE ANTIFA: The outfit that calls itself ANTIFA is a local terrorist group, not unlike the Ku Klux Klan (KKK). In fact, it smacks of the same things the Klan was known for, 100 years (or so) ago. Violence in support of Dumocrat policies to create violence upon anybody who disagrees with the Dumocrat platform. ANTIFA is today’s KKK. The only difference is that is commits violence on ANYBODY, black or white, who disagrees with Dumocrats. Liberals leap to their defense, saying they are just “human beings” who disagree with the “status quo.” But I say they are an organized mob, specifically to commit violence in order to intimidate non-liberals into accepting the liberal BS. Their very actions make them criminals.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Hillary says “All women should be believed” when they accuse a man of sexual impropriety—UNLESS they are accusing Bill. In that case, they’re just prevaricating floozies, likely put up to it by some member of the vast right-wing conspiracy… London Deputy Police Commissioner watched a fellow officer get stabbed to death, and did nothing. Because he, and the two other cops in his car, were UNARMED. Which again points up the fallacy of even HAVING unarmed cops, who can do nothing against armed criminals. They are as useless at tits on a boar… Hillary says “You can’t be civil with a party that wants to destroy everything you believe in.” Well, why do you and your party keep on doing it, then? I can’t believe she said that about the GOP, when the Dumocrats are the ones doing it the most… Hillary says the accusations against Bill are “nothing like those against Kavanaugh.” She’s right. The ones against Bill have PROOF, while those against Kavanaugh do NOT…

.