Dumocrats are dismayed that the "Stormy
Daniels story" is not hurting Trump as much as they had hoped it
would. They were hoping this would "finally take him down,"
but it hasn't seemed to have made a ripple in his support, and that
makes them very angry. They completely forget their words when
Dumocrat
Bill
Clinton got oral sex IN the Oval Office after RAPING several women.
They think those words have no effect on today's politics. They're
wrong. We remember, and we dismiss such things as a CONSENSUAL
relationship lasting ONE NIGHT, 12 years ago! Nobody's perfect,
especially where sex is concerned. I'd be AFRAID to "dip my
wick" in that honeypot, considering her background. But that's
me.
WILL
ROSEANNE
LAST? They've revived the "Roseanne
Show," and they didn't know that she was a staunch Trump
supporter. They may have thought to make liars out of those who
objected to them canceling another show because of the conservative
leanings of it's star, but it won't work. Liberals will not forgive
them for starting ANY show that isn't a "Trump-hating"
show, and liberals RULE in Hollywood, and in television. So I wonder
just how long the new "Roseanne Show" will last, before
they succumb to the
liberal
pressure and cancel the show.
KIM
GETS HIS ORDERS: Trump has been applying hard pressure on the Chinese
to "get control" of Kim Jong Stupid so he'll quit pestering
the United States and threatening nuclear war. So China told him to
come to China to get his orders--and he did. Secretly, because he
knows how much his people hate him, and he was afraid to let them
know he would be out of the country, lest they overthrow him in his
absence. So he got on his "special train" and followed
orders, and got more orders. China says their talks were
"productive," which means he should follow his orders and
come to an agreement with Trump. We shall see.
WHAT'S
STORMY'S PURPOSE? Does she want to bring Trump down? What was that
mythical non-disclosure agreement about? A CONSENSUAL relationship
that lasted one night? If it ever happened, that is. What does she
SAY she's after? If it's true she got paid $130,000.00, for
something, she's already been paid, and she has violated that
mythical "agreement" in many ways, already. I think she
just wants to be noticed, and regain some of that "fame"
she got by screwing a lot of people in front of the cameras. AND that
she's being PAID by Dumocrats to make as much trouble as she can. I
think the fact that Trump didn't sign it, says a lot.
I'M
VERY
CONSERVATIVE: At least, that's what Facebook thinks, and has applied
that label to me, without asking me a damned thing about it.
Actually, I'm a "rational individualist," who wishes to
retain the right to make my own decisions, and not cede that right to
others. If that makes me very
conservative, so be it. But I'm not. There are things about
conservatism with which I disagree. To Facebook, and other liberals,
there are only
TWO kinds of people: liberals, or conservatives. To them, there is
nothing else. And if they don't like what you think, they label you
as a "right-wing extremist," which is what very
conservative really means.
I reject that ignorance, in my own opinion, to which I DEMAND my
right.
Truth is, I don't give much of a damn what Facebook thinks about me.
I have an account. I once in a while answer someone else's post.
That's it. I don't tell strangers what I had for dinner.
WHY
NOT A MURDERER PRINCESS? Planned Parenthood is pushing for a
"princess" who has had an abortion. They're really getting
cocky
and brazen.
Maybe we ought to have
a princess who has gotten away with MURDER, too. That's what one who
has had an abortion is. Politicians just can't get it through their
thick skulls that abortion is MURDER!
It KILLS an unborn infant. It is INFANTICIDE! It should be OUTLAWED,
and never mind that CRAP about "back alley abortions."
There will always be murders, too. But we don't legalize murder. At
least not among people who have been born--yet.
Although there are some who think if a baby survives an abortion
attempt, it's okay to kill it, anyway.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment