Banning Religion

In DC, they can no longer run ads on a city bus if they have anything to do with religion. The DC Diocese lost in court when their specifically religious ads were rejected by the Transportation Board because they could not show where particularly secular ads were rejected. That's because they sued on the wrong grounds. They were not rejected because they were religious, rather than secular. They should have sued on grounds that to reject them on religious grounds was unconstitutional, The prohibition keeping religion completely OUT of anything run by the government is a misreading of the Constitution, It does NOT prohibit religion on government property. It prevents the making of ANY LAW that prohibits, or specifies a certain religion or inhibits the practice thereof.

NO CREDIT AT ALL: President trump has had his best year possible, but not a peep out of the liberal media to give him credit. Previously, Harry Truman had the record for the most legislative achievements during his tenure, but now that record is held by President Trump, in just his first year. There's no telling what's going to happen as time goes on. He has eliminated many, many of Obama's oppressive "regulations." Regulations he imposed by Executive Order, so it was easy to get rid of them the same way. He has brought the unemployment figures down to their lowest level in years, and has seen 100.000 new jobs, just this month.

TEXAS WOULDN'T HAPPEN": Anti-gun fools say that if Texas had tighter gun laws, that church shooting that killed 26 and wounded 20 others wouldn't have happened. How STUPID are these people? They can't see what's in front of their faces? No tight gun laws would have stopped that fool from coming in and shooting the place up. But they would have stopped that law-abiding gun owner who stopped the carnage from bringing his gun to church, and the fool shooter would have been able to kill many more people, while waiting for the cops to come with their guns, than he did. They insist on preaching against logic and common sense in their zeal to disarm ALL Americans.

COPS CARRY GUNS: WHY? That's a good question. The answer is simple. For self defense against all those ILLEGAL guns that are out there, in the hands of criminals. Cops "in the trenches" think more law-abiding people should be allowed to carry guns for self defense, as well as to come to the aid of a cop if he needs it. Police politicians in the upper ranks (often never were "in the trenches") may disagree. They think the cops can take care of it, but they're WRONG. The best the cops can do in the long run is document the crime scene, clean up the blood and bodies, and--maybe--if they're lucky, arrest the killer, later.

OBAMA: THE SABOTEUR: Barack Hussein Obama was the worst thing that ever happened to the United States of America. He did everything he could to UNDERMINE us, in as many ways as he could. He spent $7 TRILLION dollars in just 8 years. More than ALL previous presidents, combined. He allowed the Islamic terrorists to smuggle drugs into the United States so as to not "interfere" with his disastrous "peace agreement" with Iran. He flatly refused to recognize the threat that Islamic terrorism was to us, and allowed them to proliferate, all over the world, through his inaction in stopping them. He fostered unlimited Muslim immigration--all young men of fighting age--DISGUISED as "refugees." He "gutted" the military budget, so the military could not do what they are supposed to do. He was a DISASTER!

ONE MAN'S OPINION: Stories get stranger and stranger. Now Hillary's giving instructions on how to win an election. This from a woman who has LOST most of the elections that were not FIXED in her favor, and not even all of those. Next, she'll be telling women how to get your hubby to keep it in his pants.... Dumocrats insist on "due process" for Al Franken, but deny it to Roy Moore and Donald Trump. double standard, anybody?.... Dumocrats say Franken should submit himself to the Ethics Commission, however long it will take. You know, 20 years to forever.... Corporations are people, no matter what the liberals (Dumocrats) say. People with homes and families, mortgages and bills, just like other people If not for those people there would be no corporations, so they deserve consideration, too....

.