That’s what liberals call it when we “have the
goods” on them and they don’t like it. That’s their way of
attempting to discredit what we are saying. It’s what they’re
saying about the president’s comment about the overuse of force
represented by that 29-agent force, carrying automatic weapons
(whatever type), banging on Roger Stone’s door in the dead of
night, forcing his hearing-challenged wife to come outside in the
winter in her bare feet, wearing only a night gown, treating one
of the richest and gentlest
men in the country like a “drug kingpin” in Mexico to “arrest
him” for a couple of minor “process violations” they can’t
even prove. It’s an “intimidation factor” designed to get him to
testify to something that did not happen.
“RIGHT
TO BE SAFE”: “Trumps the right to be armed.” That’s the very
confusing statement that was made by known anti-gun fool Dumocrat
California Rep Eric Swalwell. It’s difficult for INTELLIGENT people
to understand how making yourself DEFENSELESS against the millions of
ILLEGAL guns there are already out there makes you “safe.” this
fool has to know that NONE of those highly touted “anti-gun laws”
have ever done ONE THING to stop,
or even slow down “gun crime.” Criminals, who obey NO LAWS,
simply ignore them and go on using their ILLEGAL guns to victimize
the law-abiding who, since they DO obey laws, are usually unarmed. We
keep throwing this at
anti-gun fools, but they never answer it.
REVEALING
THE WEAKNESS: Sen. Kamala Harris, Dumocrat from California, is
basically calling for a GUN BAN, which reveals the logical weakness
in the arguments of all anti-gun fools. Even though a gun ban would
be immediately judged to be unconstitutional, such a ban would be
roundly IGNORED by criminals, who don’t obey ANY laws, so why does
she expect them to obey hers? She claimed, “[T]here is no reason in
a civil society that we have assault weapons around communities.”
But there is. A GOOD reason. There are also lots of ILLEGAL guns of
all kinds, already there, and we need to be similarly armed, in order
to defend ourselves against them.
ARE
McDONALD’S “GUN-FREE?” McDonald’s and some other franchises
are somewhat “wishy-washy” about being “gun-free zones,”
although they definitely lean in that direction. They say they will
“abide by local laws,” most of which mandate that such places ARE
“gun-free zones.” How then, did a “gun fight” happen in a
Charlotte, NC McDonald’s?
Word is
that two groups were talking when one person pulled out a gun and
shot another, causing another to pull our his gun and do some more
shooting. Luckily, they were very poor shots, and nobody was killed,
although a car in a parking lot was hit. It is not known how badly
the car was injured.
GET
OFF IT, ALREADY! Okay; there’s a story there if
the governor of Virginia ever appeared in blackface and allowed
himself to be photographed that way, way back in his school days.
Okay. It was reported, and he denied it after he admitted it. But now
I have to ask, is it worth an ENTIRE DAY (or
more) of discussion on
cable news? Previous to that, this same governor APPROVED of
legislation in his state allowing a doctor to KILL a helpless infant
AS it is being born, and this story about him being in that picture
has “taken over” cable news for MORE than a day. They’re
OBSESSING over something that need not be a major story, as they
often do, while ignoring what should be brought out. I’m getting to where I am very tired of even hearing
about it. Is it true? I have no idea. All I know is that many
southern politicians were racists, back in the day.
ONE
MAN’S OPINION:
Gillette, the maker
of shaving gear, has fully joined the “liberal establishment”
with their new “anti-male” advertisement. It says men should be
less “masculine.” I think they should just make razor blades and
mind their own business otherwise. They’ve certainly lost my
business… Some are
asking why, if Dumocrats supported Barr for AG in 1991, why not in 2019? the
answer is simple. He was appointed by President Trump this time…Peelosi wanted Trump to delay the state of the Union speech until the government reopened. I thought he should tell her to go pee up a rope…
Julian Castro says
he would not pardon Trump if he got elected in 2020. Of course,
that’s something he won’t have to worry about, on two counts. He
won’t be elected, and Trump will not have anything to be pardoned
for. That’s just wishful thinking…
.
No comments:
Post a Comment