Gun Control Is Useless

It doesn't stop crime. It INCREASES crime by disarming honest, law-abiding citizens, making them "sitting ducks" for all the criminals and other bad guys who want to victimize them. Chicago is one of the best examples in that, with all their tight anti-gun laws (some so tight they're unconstitutional), they continue to have one of the highest gun crime rates in the nation. But they're not alone. Other cities with similar tight anti-gun laws have a similar problem with high gun violence rates. Cities like this with their tight anti-gun laws and a smaller number of legal guns have higher gun crime rates, while rural ares, with more legal guns tend to have much less gun crime.

"COMMON SENSE" SOLUTIONS: The anti-gun fools like to call their silly laws "common sense" solutions to the "gun problem." But they're not. In this instance, they're leaning hard on high-capacity magazines and bump stocks. As if banning them would stop a determined mass killer from getting them to use in his killing spree. They really think a law saying he can't be armed, or can't have a high-capacity magazine or a bump stock will dissuade him from his plans. People who are planning on murdering a lot of people couldn't care less about a piddling law that says they can't have certain things.

WE ALREADY HAVE IT! Pro gun people keep harping on stopping the anti-gun fools in government from having a ready list of gun owners to use when they get ready to "confiscate" (steal) all our guns. But what they don't consider is the fact that we already HAVE a "gun registry" for law-abiding people. Has anybody tried to buy a gun legally without having to go through a "background check" and a visit from the local cops to determine whether or not he/she is a criminal wanting to buy a gun (as if most criminals bought their guns legally)?

INFORMANT GAG ORDER: The question is simple: why the hell did Obama's DOJ apply a "gag order" to an informant who had significant information on a government "investigation?" Was the information he had something that would implicate Obama and/or Hillary Clinton in a crime? Was is a cover-up? It's very suspicious, and, unless Clinton or Obama forces KILL this informant, we'll find out soon--unless somebody is able to hide what he tells Congress. The Clintons have a reputation for having people who are due to testify about them get killed under very suspicious circumstances, with the locals covering it up like a cat in a litter box.

"IT ISN'T ILLEGAL!" The Dumocrats insist that "opposition research" is NOT illegal to defend themselves from the phony "Trump Dossier" about prostitutes urinating on the bed Obama once slept in, supposedly at Trump's request. They're right. Opposition research is NOT illegal--UNLESS they pay a FOREIGN SOURCE for it, which they demonstrably did. There is EVIDENCE they did, which is a little different from the "Russian collusion" connection they accuse Trump of doing. In that case, there is NO EVIDENCE to be found, after six months of diligent searching.

ONE MAN'S OPINION: An FBI informant who helped expose the "uranium deal" whereby Russia was able to buy a Canadian company that controlled 20% of America's uranium supply is under a "gag order." The deal was approved by then President Obama, then Sec. of State Hillary Clinton, and was known to then Attorney General Holder. How is it legal for politicians screwing the public to "gag" an informant who has "the goods" on them?.... Their lies are so obvious, it makes you wonder why they are believed, about anything."The Trace," a well-known anti-gun fool web site, describes self defense shootings by licensed gun owners and suicides as "gun violence" to "pad" their figures. We all know it, but gullible constituents buy it, and vote, based on their lies....

.