That's what Donald Trump, Jr. calls his meeting with that
Russian lawyer to get (he thought) a little bit of “opposition
research.” Yes, it should not have happened, but it does NOT rise
to the level of “treason,” as some Dumocrats are saying, and does
NOT constitute “collusion” with the Russians. Dumocrats are
building this into a mountain when it is a molehill, desperately
trying to make this that elusive “evidence” of collusion by Trump
people with the Russians to get him elected. Nice try, but no cigar,
people.
SEARCHING
FOR CRITICISM: Self-identified liberal Joan Walsh (MSNBC) criticized
Ivanka Trump's choice of a dress when she “sat in” for her father
in a meeting while he attended to other important business. She
called the dress “girly.” So the hell WHAT? She IS a girl.
Liberals are searching HARD for things to criticize regarding Trump,
his family, or his associates and friends. If this is all they can
come up with, they're in big trouble. Every time they criticize
something like this, they make FOOLS of themselves.
IT'S
ALL OVER! That's what the liberal media wants us to think, now that a
Dumocrat has started articles of impeachment against President Trump,
citing “high crimes and misdemeanors.” I don't know what he has
cited, but I don't think they ARE “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
They're “whistling past the graveyard” and 'throwing crap up
against the wall, hoping it will stick.” And he's got the liberal
media pissing in their boots, hoping. I can't count the number of
articles of impeachment that have been filed against various
presidents that have come to nothing.
WISHFUL
THINKING: Dumocrats everywhere are ecstatic. A Dumocrat has filed
“articles of impeachment” against Donald Trump. Hoopa hoopa! I
wonder how many times an opposition party has conned one of their
members into filing articles of impeachment against the opposition
party standard bearer? And how many times has it come to anything?
ONCE in recent years, and because of proven LYING by a president—and
they STILL couldn't remove him from office. Do they really think they
are gonna succeed this time?
“GUN
CONTROL IS RACIST”:
That's what a writer at Salon
thinks, anyway. She talks about Trump's “heavy handed”
enforcement of gun laws, which is completely non-existent. She
compared gun violence reports to the old “red line” policies of
the past (80 years ago), and found similarities. Thus, she determined
that gun control was racist. I really get tired of liberals always
coming out with new things that are “racist,” based on the
thinnest “evidence” possible, and which stretch the definition of
racism to the limit.
TAX
CUTS FOR RICH: Liberals, when they want to con people out of more
money, they start talking about passing a new tax on the rich. They spread
the bulldung that “the rich” got that way by “stealing from the
poor.” Tell me—how do you steal from people who HAVE nothing, and
by so doing, become rich? It doesn't make sense. But then, nothing said or done by liberals make sense to intelligent people. The richer these
people become, the more jobs for the rest of us they create, making
the economy ever better. I get really tired of that old liberal
refrain any time there is a reduction in taxes, that “most of it
goes to the rich.” Yep, it does. And they are entitled, because
they put more into the economy than anybody else. A 10% tax for ALL
of us results in more money for the rich than it does for, say, me,
since they put a lot more into it than I did—and that's only right.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment