Does anybody believe that Bill Clinton was “just walking
around on the airport tarmac one day” when he found out AG Loretta
Lynch's plane was there, and “stopped by to talk about their
grandchildren?” Or that it was “just by chance” that the DOJ,
which she runs, went to court to get Hillary's e-mail release delayed
until WAY after the election the same day? When was the last time
ANYBODY was allowed to just “walk around” on an airport tarmac?
DOG AND
PONY SHOW: On my television, which is right beside me as I work, is
the congressional “grilling” of FBI Director Comey about his
decision NOT to prosecute Hillary Clinton for violating the laws
regarding the handling of classified information for government
employees. From the questions I hear, and the demeanor of MOST of
the committee members, it's “dog and pony show” designed to get
“face time” for various congress members, and nothing else. One
member actually SAID that the members could NOT be impartial, on
EITHER side, and he was right.
“KILL
THE NRA”: An Adjunct Professor at Southern State Community college
has advocated SH0OTING the top executives of the NRA so they could
get anti-gun legislation passed. Guns in the hands of those
executives killing the killers notwithstanding, they'd have to seek
out, and kill ALL the millions of members. That's a “disconnect” they
don't even understand. They're advocating taking GUNS and KILLING the
very people who advocate their right to USE a gun for anything. The
school is considering his dismissal.
ENVYING
INCOMPETENCE: The mayor of Louisville, KY wishes he had anti-gun laws
similar to those in Chicago in his city. Notwithstanding there have
been 2,026 gun violence cases SO FAR this year in Chicago, in SPITE
of those laws. That their gun violence statistics EXCEED those of
BOTH Los Angeles and New York City. That seems to be just a tad
INCOMPETENT, to me. I guess it's true that if it's a stupid law,
they'll pass it in Kentucky. That's because of stupid politicians
like this. I think it's instructive that he is a Democrat.
REMOVE
HER CLEARANCE: The government should revoke the security clearance of
Hillary Clinton because of her carelessness in handling state secrets
in the past. If she has no more consideration than that about
classified information, she has no business having any kind of a
security clearance. Yes, that would probably make her ineligible to
be president, which is just one good thing that would come from
revoking her clearance. But nobody has the gonads to do it.
BACK TO
COOLING? I've made a big thing of the fact that, in the seventies,
they were worried about global COOLING,” and then “flip-flopped”
into “global WARMING” and expected us to get excited about a ONE
DEGREE increase in global temperature over 100 years, and their
contention that it was “man caused.” Now they're considering
going back to the “danger of a new ice age” concept again. Maybe
if they'd make up their minds, somebody might take them more
seriously. I think they've already discredited themselves.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment