Muslims say we discriminate against them because of their
faith. That's a bogus accusation, and a lie. We “discriminate
against them” because they want to KILL everybody who won't convert
to Islam, and they spend their time being “offended” by what are,
for us, everyday actions. We don't try to change their really
perverted actions like screwing little boys or making their women wear "tents," so why should they think they can change what we
are? It's not about faith, it's about actions.
SELECTIVE
CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION: In a letter to the California Attorney
General signed by 19 DEMOCRAT legislators, the idea that the first
amendment doesn't cover “climate change deniers” is put forth.
They talk about “misleading information” put out by Exxon without
acknowledging their own misleading information. My question is, if
they are taken seriously, who
gets to decide
what information is misleading? And what makes them think they can
“shut up” their critics? A Constitution that allows them
to lie about climate change, and decide what is, or is NOT
“misleading information is a contradiction.
NO
FLY LISTS: Trump now thinks we should ban ownership of guns for
people whose names are on a “no fly list” or a “terrorist watch
list.” That's wrong. Yes those lists could be used to keep track of
guns being bought by those on those lists, but should not allow them
to be banned outright from gun ownership. The Orlando shooter should
have been on a “watch list” after being “investigated” for 11
months so that his buying several guns at the same time would ALERT
the FBI and trigger an investigation that might have uncovered his
plot before he could have killed 49 people and wounded another 50.
But the criteria for being put on those lists needs to be tightened
up considerably so it takes more than one person's opinion to get
your name on it.
“SECRETLY”
REPEALING SECOND? The New York Times thinks there should be a “secret
court” that can “secretly” repeal the Second Amendment. Which
goes totally against how the Constitution was set up by the founders.
There is NO WAY such a court could get rid of the Second Amendment.
There are specific ways mentioned IN THE CONSTITUTION on how it can
be changed, and a secret court is not one of them. Especially to
remove one of our most BASIC rights “secretly.” That's a damned fool
idea by New York liberals.
CLINTON:
TRUMP A WAR-MONGER: Hillary Clinton says “Trump could lead us into
war.” No kidding? So could she. And she is more likely to do so
than Trump ever was, because she would be a continuation of the
ignorant foreign policy that marked the Obama administration. And it
is that policy that got us into more wars under Obama than under any
other president, in memory. As usual, she's accusing Republicans of
what Democrats are doing, and have done.
BLAMING
THE GUN: As usual. The Boston Globe is running a full-front page
picture of an AR-15, with the label, “Make It Stop!” Meanwhile,
Obama visits the Orlando shooting victim's families and the survivors
and says, “If we don't act, we'll see more of these shootings.”
Meaning we should take away all guns from honest, law-abiding people,
leaving them defenseless against such shootings. He just can't get it
through his thick skull that the shooter OBEYED all applicable gun
laws in BUYING his guns, then BROKE them when he started killing
those people.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment