Walid Shoebat, a (former) Jihadist, writes
about a girl whose death was ordered by her own MOTHER and carried
out by her BROTHERS after her mother could find no “hit man” to
kill her (and was too chicken to do it herself). Her “CRIME?” She was RAPED by a Muslim man and her
family from then on found her “unclean.” What about the man who
raped her? He is not mentioned, and remains nameless, to go out and
rape another girl, who will then be considered “unclean” and
probably killed by her own Muslim family. If the man is ever found,
he will not be punished. They will say she “seduced him.”
SOWELL'S
RIGHT: In a recent article in which he cites many facts IGNORED by
“gun-law crazies,” he says this: “The zealotry of gun-control
advocates might make some sense if they had any serious evidence that
more restrictive gun-control laws actually reduce gun crimes. But
they seldom even discuss the issue in terms of empirical evidence.”
They won't discuss it because they know there's no HONEST answer they
can give to this KNOWN fact without proving themselves wrong. The article appeared in “The
Columbian,” if you want to Goggle it. Or just go to Sowell's web
site.
SEVENTH
DAY ADVENTIST? Now they're saying Ben Carson is a “Seventh Day
Adventist.” So the hell WHAT? I don't know of anything in their
liturgy that makes them unable to swear allegiance to the
Constitution of the United States, as there is in the Muslim
“religion,” which isn't a real religion at all, just CLAIMS to be
one, to take advantage of our preferential treatment of religions. So
what do we care about that?
OBAMA
BLAMES FOX: Surprise, surprise! It's always Fox or Bush. It's
always somebody else, not his own ignorant policies. Fox was only the
conduit for the TRUTH about him. So yes, they MAY be “responsible”
for getting the truth out. So what? That's their job, and they seem
to be one of the few outlets that is DOING that job, today. And
that's what Obama hates about them. He hates ANYBODY who tells the
truth instead of “carrying his water.”
PLAYBOY'S
A GONER: They've announced they will no longer publish pictures of
naked women. Do they really think anybody reads their magazine for
anything ELSE? Yes, they have some quality articles, but I stopped
reading them a long time ago because other magazines have better
ones. It's really funny that the FIRST “soft-core porn” magazine
was “done in” by porn on the Internet. I wonder if any of the
other myriad similar mags will do the same. And if they do, will they
survive?
THEY
REALLY GOT GALL: Muslims are going to court to force schools to teach
that “Muhhammed is the prophet of God” in schools. Boy, they sure
have their gall! We can't even teach that “Jesus is our Savior”
in schools, and they want to FORCE us to teach a LIE? Their lie? All part of
their scheme to “infiltrate” us and create a Muslim state
undercover. I'd tell them to stick it in what's pointing upward when
they pray.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment