Jeb Bush is getting a lot of flack
(mostly from Democrats) for his answer to the question about if he
would do the same things as his brother did regarding the Iraq war.
Missed in all the hooraw is that the question, as asked, was aboiut
what he would do under “what they knew then,” not what we know
now, and he answwred that he would, indeed, have invaded Iraq. But,
unlike Hillary, he does at least ANSWER questions from the press.
POWER OUTAGE: Some guy flubbed his dub and ran over a roadside transformer
on the freeway and took it out. It took them almost 24 hours to find
another one and get it installed and working. Meanwhile we just
suffered while they made numerous promises about when it would come
back on, all of them wrong.The power went out at about 3 PM Friday
and back on (for the last time) about 2 PM Saturday. It went on and
off three times before finally coming on and staying on. The outage
not only caused me not to be able to use the computer, it took me off
the WiFi so I couldn't post anything.; Sorry, folks.
IT
WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO: I maintain that invading Iraq and “taking
out” Saddam was ABSOLUTELY the right thing to do, even under what
we know today. They DID ultimately find weapons of mass destruction
in Iraq, even though Saddam had most of them shipped to Syria during
the period while we dithered about whether or not to invade. The
evidence was there that he helped TRAIN those who did the 9/11
atrocity, and that he gave Islamic terrorists money and a “safe
harbor “between missions.”
TO
BE EXPECTED: When Americans attacked an Islamic terrorist compound in
Syria, they used civilians as “cover,” making us shoot them
before we got to the terrorists, as usual. That this gives them a PR
victory goes without saying. But in the long run it didn't do them
much good, as we killed all their outer guards, as well as their top
“oil production” man. They try to play his death down, saying he
“wasn't such a much” in the normal scheme of things, but he was
in complete charge of their oil acquisition.. Of course, since he was
so unimportant, that's why the compound was surrounded with guards
for us to kill.
NEVER
NEUTRAL: George Stephanopoulos has always been a Democrat
“aparatchick.” Never a “neutral observer.” He has always been
such, since way before he testified before a Congressional committee
that he “lied to his own notebook.” So why did ABC hire him as an
anchor and all-around news man? That's easy. It was for the same
reason NBC hired Bill Clinton's daughter Chelsea, for a PART-TIME job
at a six-figure salary. To gain favor from Bill and Hillary,
expecting Hillary to con herself back into the Oval Office. So it's not
surprising that George not only CONTRIBUTED massive amounts of money
to the Bill and Hillary Crime Foundation, but he was ACTIVE in their
operations all the while PRETENDING to be “neutral.”
PROBLEMS
AT INDY: They've had several major accidents in practice for the
Indianapolis 500. Most notably the one involving Helio Castronevis,
but also the one involving Ed Carpenter, both involving Chevrolets,
which has a new “aero package” for this year. The third was Josef
Newgarden, Carpenter's team mate. All hit the wall at approximately
the same place. If this keeps up, those Indy drivers will have to
start getting pilot's licenses. The accidents happening in roughly
the same place is less important than all three being Chevys, with
that new “aero package.” The speedway might ban that package. All
drivers were uninjured, which speaks well of their safety
precautions.
ISIS
VOWS REVENGE: Ho, hum, so what? They're vowing “revenge” for the
raid that killed their top oil official. Will that involve anything
other than “everyday business?” They seem to think this is some
kind of a FEUD, not a war. “Tit for tat.” You kill one of ours,
we kill one of yours.” But it's not. They've declared all-out WAR
on us, and they shouldn't be surprised at what they get. Although
they're probably surprised Obana “signed off” on this raid I
guess he couldn't avoid it, or be exposed as the two-faced Islamic
terrorist he is.
WHAT
HAVE WE GOT FOR PROSECUTORS? This is the second prosecutor in the
Northeast to make an abysmally STUPID statement about a case in which
she's involved. Talking about the surviving Boston Bomber, she tells
us he SAID he “did it for all other Muslims," then goes on to say
“it was NOT a religious crime.” What? How STUPID can she be?
Just as stupid as is Obama, I'd guess. You know: the fool who won't
recognize an Islamic terrorist operation if the perp got an inch from
his face and shouted Allahu Akbar!” right in his face, wetting him
down with his spittle.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment