Damned, Subversive Democrats

 it’s not just that I disagree with them, or that they disagree with me. It’s that they treat ANY disagreement with them as a “sin” requiring a violent response. One of the most common headlines is, “Democrats Infuriated At (fill in the blank).” They get “infuriated” easily. All you have to do to “infuriate” them is disagree with them, and state that disagreement publicly. That will predictably send them into a “meltdown.” And they do many things that merit criticism and disagreement. The recent media circus against the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, for instance. They pulled every evil, dirty trick they could think of on him. And, predictably, failed.

GUILTY WITHOUT EVIDENCE: One of the cherished rights enjoyed by Americans is the right to be considered innocent until PROVEN guilty, which is the reverse of how it is done in almost (maybe ALL) other countries. There, if the government (or anybody else) accuses you, you are “guilty until proven innocent.” But here, for most of our existence, the need, on the part of the government, to PROVE us guilty has BEEN the “rule of law.” UNTIL Dumocrat politicians want your scalp. Then they accuse you (WITHOUT proof) of sexual impropriety, and treat that accusation as Gospel, as they are now doing with our most recent Supreme Court Justice. The problem is, with ANY “accusation” of sexual impropriety, no proof is required. Just the accusation is enough to ruin a person’s life.

NRA APPLAUDS CONFIRMATION: They applauded the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Which will, of course, mean a lot of useless whining and crying from the left because the NRA disagrees with them (something they ought to know, anyway). They whine and cry, and stomp their feet in tantrums every time somebody (even those known to be on the other side) disagrees with them, thinking that all the world should agree with their silly policies. One thing I like about the NRA is that they just don’t give a “tinker’s damn” about what the left thinks, about anything—and they aren’t afraid to show it. They “flip the left off” with their every act, and I love that.

SUBVERTING DUE PROCESS: Liberals don’t like due process—unless it helps them get out of trouble. One of their latest attempts is to allow accusers to appeal cases that go against them, which violates the “double jeopardy” clause in the Constitution, allowing a defendant who was found not guilty to be subsequently found guilty on the same evidence. “It was the Obama administration that demanded schools judge cases of alleged sexual assaults under a "clear and convincing evidence" standard rather than on a "preponderance of evidence" standard.” And they want laws that allow punishment BEFORE a guilty verdict is reached, especially in gun cases. And further, before the investigation into the charges.

GUN CONTROL NO ISSUE: At least, it shouldn’t be an issue. The right of all Americans to be armed for self defense is GUARANTEED in the Constitution, to which ALL LAWS must adhere. If they don’t, they can be declared unconstitutional and made null and void. The Second Amendment clearly states: the right of all Americans to bear arms “SHALL NOT BE ABRIDGED.” Yet slimy politicians continue to make laws to limit or control gun ownership, and each one IS an ABRIDGMENT. Thus, they are unconstitutional.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Somebody’s taking a poll, asking: “Should Trump resign?” What kind of a damned fool would even ASK such a question, with all the good things he has been able to do? It doesn’t matter what he does, the left will find fault with it… Liberals are now saying “Bert and Ernie” of Sesame Street are gay. How stupid is that? But liberals don’t know, or care when their ideas are stupid. Puppets can’t be gay. They don’t have the plumbing for it. Just another way to make waves… Michelle Obama has a new book coming out. they’re asking what the title should be. I recommend, “Nothing Of Interest Here”… I keep getting e-mails telling me Michelle put out a picture of herself posing in a bathrobe, asking, “Do you miss her?” Yes. I miss her, every chance I get… Whenever you’re able to stop liberals with inescapable logic, they change the rules without telling you until it’s too late. For instance, they say “If it saves one life, it’s worth it. Now they’re saying, “If concealed carry saves one life, it’s NOT worth it… Dumocrats in Colorado are running ads criticizing Mike Kaufman for having a NRA rating of “A”. Okay, so I’ll vote for Kaufman…

.

Kavanaugh Is Human

The liberals accused him of being a would-be rapist, of running “rape rooms,” of being a drunkard, and of everything else they could “throw up against the wall to see if it will stick,” and when he proved he was a human being and “hit back,” they criticized him for that. Like he should have been able to withstand all the “slings and arrows” and still maintain a “poker face” and not get mad. After all the inhuman things of which he has been accused (without evidence, I might add), he has a RIGHT to be angry, judge, or not. Judges are human.

A “DIVIDED COUNTRY”: There are many who say we are a “divided country.” And they’re right. We are. The Founders INTENDED it to be that way. They designed this government to BE a “divisive force” where opposing ideas can be said, out loud, where such ideas are STIFLED, in other countries. They WANTED there to be “division.” There will always be opinions that differ from ours, and they wanted us to be able to express those ideas freely, without fear of government action against the dissenters. We have always been a “divided country,” and that is a GOOD THING. Healthy disagreement is good.

“ACCUSED EQUALS GUILT”: This country is the only one in the world (to my knowledge) in which the “rule of law” is, “innocent until proven guilty.” In just about all other countries, if the government accuses you of a crime, you are “guilty until proven innocent.” That’s wrong. The government should not be able to “criminalize” you by simply ACCUSING you of a crime, and then force you to prove your innocence, something that is often impossible. You cannot prove a negative. I have always been proud of this difference between ours, and other countries. But recently, we seem to have abandoned that, at least, where politics is involved.

THE CIRCUS ENDS: Maybe. We’ve spent the best part of the last two weeks—and more watching the “dog and pony show” they called an “investigation” of why Brent Kavanaugh should not be confirmed to the Supreme Court. Not whether he should or should not be confirmed. Why he should NOT. His guilt was already decided by everybody on the Dumocrat side, and their decision was irrevocable. Kavanaugh’s nomination was to be defeated, at all costs. Whatever they had to do, legal or illegal, true or lie, that’s what they would do. Then they lost, and called "foul," again.

DEMOCRATS WILL WHINE: They will cry, and they will stamp their feet and hold their breath, as they continue their tantrum after Brett Kavanaugh was finally confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice—a lifetime appointment. They could no longer hurt him, unless he committed some foul deed, which he is not likely to do, even though they accused him (without any kind of proof) of many foul deeds in their tantrum to keep him off the Court. They will use many hankies as they blubber for a long time. They will continue their tantrum for many years.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Former Sec. Of State Kerry might be telling Iran to, ”just wait, we’ll have more flexibility after the election.” He’s right. Nobody will care what he and his cronies think or say after they LOSE it, and are thrown into the “dustbin of history” with the rest of the trash… Colorado Dumocrats are running ads saying Jared Polis didn’t pay taxes for 10 years (where have I heard that before?). It has already been proven false, but they keep running that ad. And he’s a Dumocrat… I really get tired of all the lying political ads running right now—on both sides. I hope my BS meter survives the pressure… Anything to delay confirmation… In Venezuela, they have a major “gun crime” problem. So they made some more anti-gun laws to combat it. And ALL crime increased… 

.

Doesn't Work: Do It

An anti-gun fool “researcher” found, in his “research,” that background checks don’t work. Then he says we need more and better background checks. This is typical of anti-gun fools. Take the results of “research,” and then deny those results. He basically told us, “Just because background checks don’t work, don’t think we don’t need to use them in our efforts to deny our citizens the constitutional right to be armed for self defense.” He didn’t put it exactly that way, but that’s what he was actually saying. This is a good example of a “researcher” who, when his research refutes his favorite pipe dream, he just refutes his refutation and goes right on with his attempts to fool us with his “research.”

TO BAN SELF DEFENSE: It has become increasingly apparent to me that the government doesn’t just want to “get rid of guns.” They want to get rid of the very CONCEPT of self defense. Even if they ever do manage to get rid of all the legal guns in the world, there will still be other items capable of allowing us to use them in self defense. And whenever they discover them, they ban them, too. A good example of this is their efforts to ban stun guns, one of the best non-gun self defense weapons. They can’t kill, but are effective to use in self defense. As they discover other effective self defense weapons, they will ban them, too.

NO PRO DEMONSTRATORS: I just listened to a news reporter on a “friendly” cable news station (Which shall remain nameless. “Foxy,” huh?) where the reporter was impressed by the fact that there wasn’t a single “pro-Kavanaugh” demonstrator there. Obviously, she didn’t consider the fact that the anti-Kavanaugh demonstrators are all liberals, who tend to be violent—and they don’t want to get “beat up.” There’s another reason why pro-Kavanaugh demonstrators are not there—non-liberals don’t usually demonstrate much, and we have won, so far. So they don’t NEED to demonstrate for anything. So it doesn’t really mean anything that there are no “pro Kavanaugh” demonstrators there.

CAN HE DO IT? There is a movement asking, “Can Trump fulfill ALL his campaign promises?” Which makes me ask, “Has ANY politician EVER fulfilled ALL his/her campaign promises?” And then I notice that he has fulfilled way more of his campaign promises, already, than have any other politicians, in the history of politics. CAN he fulfill ALL of his campaign promises? The answer is, “yes.” If anybody can do it, Trump can. He has proven his critics wrong, in every way possible, and he continues to do it. Getting tired of winning, America?

RESISTANCE IS FUTILE! That’s what we need to tell Facebook and Twitter. Twitter has “suspended” ten more “conservative accounts” without stating a reason. But we know what the reason is: they don’t agree with the things those conservatives are saying, and they think, by muzzling them on their platform, they can stop ALL criticism of liberals. They cannot. There are too many other platforms out there they DON’T control. So the ideas they abhor WILL “get out,” in spite of their feeble attempts at censorship. In Soviet Russia, the government did the censoring. In America, they don’t need to. American citizens are doing it for them.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Colorado hasn’t put a criminal to death in a long time, and that’s a mistake, causing many deadly criminals to move here to commit their murders, hoping to escape the death penalty. But if there ever was a justification for the death penalty is it in the case of Chris Watts, who murdered his wife, their two children, and their unborn baby. Some people just don’t deserve to breathe the same air as human beings, and this guy is one of them… The congressional approval of Judge Brett Kavanaugh was in danger, because of the UNSUPPORTED word of a Dumocrat operative, who wore a “vagina hat” in a recent pro-abortion gathering. That, alone, disqualifies her to me as a truth-teller. He won, anyway… If he denies it, he must be guilty. That’s what liberals are saying about Judge Kavanaugh’s vehement denials of those “attempted rape” accusations. So I guess now if you try and defend yourself against false accusations, that makes you guilty…

.

They Know It: Doesn't Matter

The TSA (Tough Sh-t Agency) knew these items were not dangerous, but they LOOKED like they MIGHT be, so they banned them, anyway, forcing people who had them to enclose them in a “checked bag” in order to take them on an airplane. They are used to keep drinks colder, longer. Completely innocuous. But they LOOK LIKE bullets, so they treat them in STUPID ways. Of course, bullets without guns to fire them are just as innocuous. But that doesn’t matter to the bureaucrats running things, these days.

REALLY STUPID ACLU: The ACLU is running an ad comparing Judge Kavanaugh (who is only ACCUSED of sexual misconduct by women who can’t even say for sure it was him, but who ASSUME it was) with two KNOWN sexual abusers, against whom their sexual misconduct was PROVEN, Bill Clinton, and Bill Cosby. It’s like that Hawaiian senator, who says "Judge Kavanaugh is not entitled to be considered innocent until proven guilty because he is a conservative." They say we should not have “any doubt.” Which flies in the face of our “rule of law” where ALL accused are considered innocent until proven guilty. ANYBODY can “accuse,” if proof is not required, which is apparently the case with Supreme Court appointees appointed by President Trump.

IMPOSSIBLE TO USE: When an armed criminal with an illegally-owned gun comes at you, SECONDS count. So if the gun you own for self defense is locked in a safe, what do you do, call a “time out” while you go and work the combination so you can get your gun into operation to save your life? This “safe storage” law is like most anti-gun fool laws, in that is makes life a lot easier for the holder of ILLEGAL guns to victimize the law-abiding, who DO obey laws, and which criminals do NOT. That this makes your gun USELESS doesn't bother them.

THE POT, DAUGHTER, AND KETTLE: Talk about the “pot calling the kettle black,” once removed! Chelsea Clinton (daughter of the best known sexual predator in the country) is lecturing the nation on sex. What the hell does she think she knows about sexual predators that she didn’t learn by watching her father in action? And she pretends to lecture US on “sexual predators.” She ought to know: she lives (or lived) with one!

“SERIOUS ACCUSATIONS”: The Dumocrats talk about the accusations made by Christine Ford and some other women as being “serious accusations,” as if just the accusations meant Judge Kavanaugh was guilty, just because he has been ACCUSED. Well, ANYBODY can make an accusation, so long as no proof is required, as seems to be the case, here. Yes, many women HAVE been sexually abused, and don’t have any proof. That doesn’t mean a man, about whom there has NEVER been any CREDIBLE accusations in his 36 years since Christine Ford’s accusations, MUST be guilty, just because she has accused him.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Puerto Rican “authorities” originally claimed just 64 deaths from a hurricane. Now suddenly, they claim 3,000 deaths, but no bodies. Looks like some of them want to paint Trump badly. But more than anything, it shows their own incompetence… Everybody (mostly liberals) are saying that, “The Manafort deal” is “bad news” for Trump, without knowing even what he will, or CAN say to Mueller, as usual. Create a narrative, and HOPE it gets proven. I don’t think Manafort can say ANYTHING detrimental to Trump, unless he lies to gain an advantage… Why is John Kerry not in prison? If I did what he has done, I would definitely be in prison. Private citizens are not allowed to “negotiate” about government policy with foreign governments… The fools still promoting Obamacare keep saying getting rid of that monstrosity would “kick millions off health care.” Actually, the only ones taken off health care would be the ones who WANT to get off Obamacare because it’s way too expensive and provides almost NOTHING… 

. 

Sorry Again

You’re probably wondering where I’ve been lately. I’ve been in the hospital because of increased heartbeat early Wednesday morning. My heart was beating at twice the usual rate, which was very uncomfortable and a bit frightening. But turned out to be not as dangerous as we originally thought. All is well, now, but everybody’s worried, considering my age. But I seem to be okay now, and it will soon be “business as usual.”

BLAMING THE NRA: The favorite “whipping boy” of the anti-gun fools is the NRA. In doing so, they assume that the people responsible for “gun crime” are those who follow the law and register their guns. They are NOT. The people responsible for “gun crime” are CRIMINALS. They don’t obey laws. So how can the anti-gun fools assume that they will obey their silly, stupid, USELESS gun laws? They do NOT. So how can they, in all conscience, blame the NRA for sticking up for the Constitutional right of all Americans who are NOT criminals, to own and use a gun for self defense against those who do not obey ANY laws, much less the ones that say they cannot use a gun in committing their other crimes?

GIVING UP THEIR GUNS: The Huffington Post says, “Some people want to give up their guns” but it’s so hard to get rid of them. Where the hell did they find some fool to say that? One such person says, “Needing a gun sucks. If everyone was a decent human being, it wouldn’t be necessary.” This guy lives alone with his “licensed comfort dog” in Eugene, Oregon. Obviously a liberal. Only liberals think that way. What he will never realize is that everybody is NOT a “decent human being,” and never will be. He will always need a gun for protection against them. That’s something liberals always deny.

REPORT OFFENSIVE COMMENTS: In Great Britain, the cops are asking citizens to “report insulting or offensive comments.” Why, I can’t fathom, Surely there can’t be LAWS against them, even in the UK, where they don’t have a First Amendment. Even if there are, they are so subjective as to be amenable to ANYBODY’S definition of “offensive and insulting.” As such, they are UNENFORCEABLE if you take common sense into consideration. If it ever happens here (and liberals are pushing for them), we’re in deep doo-doo.

INCOMPREHENSIBLE FOOL: A senator from Hawaii says Judge Kavanaugh is not entitled to be considered “innocent until proven guilty” as are the foulest criminals, buy law, because he is a conservative. This from a person of the same lineage as the people who attacked us at Pearl Harbor, who lives in the state where it happened. Apparently, we (not me) regularly elect such fools to positions where they are able to affect the laws that are made, which is why we have so many STUPID laws in force. Somebody needs to start a list of stupid lawmakers so we can work to eliminate them from any position where they can affect our laws.

IT’S NOT WORKING: DO MORE OF IT: IN Chicago, it appears that the politicians aren’t the only dumb people. Now some citizens are suing them to get even more “gun laws” made, saying the ones in force aren’t working. They say 40% of the guns used in crime are sold by a specific number of “named” gun stores outside Chicago, but in the near vicinity. Not mentioned is whether or not those guns were sold legally to non-felons or “under the table” to felons. That distinction is never made when anti-gun fools want to make laws that violate our constitutional right to own and use the means to self defense, a gun.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: When the cops start asking the public to “report offensive or insulting comments,” as they’re actually doing in the UK, we’re in bog trouble. My only reply to that is definitely insulting and offensive, to the cops… They ought to dunk Kavanaugh in water to see if he’s guilty. If he drowns, he’s innocent. If he survives, he’s guilty. That’s the “rule of law” they used in the first “witch hunt” in Salem… The very fact that the FBI has “restricted access” to the conclusions in the SEVENTH “investigation” of Kavanaugh tells me that there is something wrong here… Shouldn’t the fact that Kavanaugh is only (supposed) to have sexually assaulted ONLY “far left, radical feminists?” Never any “conservative women? I think so… Well, Susan Collins and Joe Manchin both have signified they will vote “yes” on Kavanaugh, meaning he will be confirmed, if others’ votes remain as they promised. Collins confirmed that after what seemed like a three hour speech I though was unnecessary, since all she really had to do was confirm her vote…

.

The Wrong Way

“Gun crime” is out of control. So the anti-gun fools keep making laws that do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down gun crime. To the contrary: they make it worse by DISARMING the law-abiding, while the law breakers go right on buying their guns ILLEGALLY, or just stealing them. Researchers put out all kinds of figures they want us to think back up their stories. But there is one glaring error in those figures. None of them take into consideration the LEGALITY of the ownership of the guns used in victimizing the law-abiding. Nobody seems interested in whether or not the guns used in crime are legally owned, or not. It is rarely mentioned.

HER OWN MEDICINE: “Mad Max(ine)” Waters likes to tell her “supporters” to harass members of the Trump administration, and we’ve seen them do it. Coming up to them while they are eating dinner in a restaurant, or just going into their homes. Or “cornering” people in elevators and screaming at them with inanities. She needs to get a dose of her own medicine. I’m sure she goes out to eat often, so somebody needs to go up to her and harass her the same way her acolytes do to Trump people. Find her walking on the street and chase her down the street screaming inanities at her, the way her dupes are doing to Trump people. She may think she is immune to such harassment. She is NOT.

“GUN CONTROL NOT POSSIBLE”: Anti-gun fools keep arguing that the Second Amendment is an outmoded concept, written hundreds of years ago by men who feared the British. What they never mention is that the Second Amendment RECOGNIZES one very basic human RIGHT. The right to self defense against all comers, even if they are “government agents.” And that will NEVER be “outmoded.” This article details many reasons why “gun control is no longer possible.” What it fails to mention is that gun control has NEVER been possible. There is not a single “gun control law” now in force, or envisioned by short-sighted anti-gun fools that will ever do ANYTHING to reduce, or eliminate “gun crime.”

IT HAS NEVER WORKED: Gun buybacks are a popular “cure” for gun violence, that does not “cure” anything. And that is on record! But anti-gun fools keep devoting a lot of resources and money to gun buybacks. As with all their other anti-gun laws, gun buybacks have proven to be completely ineffective at stopping, or even slowing down gun violence. Gun buybacks needlessly expend resources in a futile attempt to reduce gun crime, but you can’t convince today’s anti-gun fools of that. They march right along, sponsoring them, even though there is ample evidence that they are completely useless. If they ever came up with something that would WORK, I’d be right beside them promoting it.

DOING THE UNTHINKABLE: Gullible doctors are performing IRREVERSIBLE surgery on CHILDREN because those children (average age 13) suddenly decide they don’t like their sex and want to be the other. In the case of girls, they perform a double mastectomy to let those girls IMAGINE they are a boy because they no longer have breasts. But there’s still one little problem: they haven’t yet figured out how to give them a penis. And without a penis, they are NOT a boy, no matter how much they wish to be one. I don’t know if they’re cutting off boy’s penises yet, but I’m sure that will come soon, if not already.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: I have to laugh at the political ads where a candidate gripes about his opponent’s “negative ads” in HIS negative ads…Another real funny ad is the one where a candidate thinks his opponent voting with Trump 96% of the time is a winning criticism. On the contrary. That means many people like me who can see reality also vote with Trump… Another political ad whines about a politician “criticizing a real war hero.” As if being a “war hero” means he cannot be criticized, in any way… Omarosa is going to release yet another tape. Ho, hum, who cares? I certainly don’t… Another ho, hum. Former VP Joe Biden says he’s going to run for president against Trump. What a way to guarantee Trump a second term… Dumocrats are trying HARD to take credit for the very good economy for which Trump’s policies are responsible. They really think we’re stupid enough to believe them… Jimmie Carter says he would change all the policies Trump has initiated. Which doesn’t surprise me, given that Jimmie was one of the most INCOMPETENT presidents in recent history…

.

"Serious Allegations"

Dumocrats talk about Kavanaugh having “serious allegations against him,” and that this, alone, should cause them to “bend over backward” to investigate (which they did, six times). One congressman even asked a newswoman, “Would you have preferred that she not come forward?” (The Kavanaugh case) My answer would be, no. I would have preferred she come forward with something besides her unsupported word to back up her allegations. Anybody can “allegate,” if he/she is not required to provide PROOF of his/her allegations.

ACTIONS & CONSEQUENCES: Liberals are criticizing Brett Kavanaugh for getting mad, after they have “raked him over the coals” for something that probably never happened when he was a teenager. Actions have consequences. You can’t do that to a man without pissing him off. I think his reaction to the committee was quite reasoned. Most human beings would have “gone off” a lot more than that. I certainly would have. I’d have been jumping up and down on their desks, leaving my footprints on their papers. You just can’t libel a man without making him mad. And a judge is still a man.

GUN CONTROL “GHOST TOWN”: Five million members? I don’t think so! MOMS Against Guns (or something like that) claims to have five million members, but their recent chapter meeting looked like a “ghost town.” If you can’t even draw more than a trickle to your meetings, there is no way you have five million paid members. One new member says she got involved after the Sandy Hook killings. And I believe her. But what she got involved in has no chance in reducing “gun violence” because all they do is make laws that the bad guys routinely ignore.

IT JUST DOESN’T WORK! Gun control, as we know it, has a clear history of doing NOTHING to reduce gun violence. And Dumocrat politicians never hesitate to LIE to promote their wish to disarm all law-abiding citizens, even if the Constitution prohibits it. Dumocrat Elizabeth Warren (the presidential hopeful) tells us confidently that Massachusetts, which is a BIG anti-gun state, Has the lowest gun crime rate in the nation (at least she tried). Only one little problem with that. It’s not true. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (hardly a pro-gun outfit), Massachusetts has NEVER been the lowest, when it came to gun deaths.

DEMS’ 30 MINUTE MONEY GRAB: It took some Dumocrats just 30 minutes to start pleading for more money on the strength of Christine Ford’s testimony, alleging that, somehow, she was (almost) raped, and that Judge Kavanaugh (both then a teenager) was responsible. She even painted a picture of not only a rapist, but a possible murderer, as well. All without a BIT of real evidence, only her UNSUPPORTED WORD. Last time I looked, that was not enough to convict anybody in court. But not in “the court of public opinion,” it seems. The likelihood of the FBI “uncovering” anything new in a 30-year-old ALLEGED (almost) rape is unlikely. Unless something is PLANTED by the Dumocrats.

ONE MAN’S OPINION: Woodward’s book says, “Trump’s plan to eliminate the federal debt is to “print money.” Seems to me that was OBAMA’S plan. He gave it that good-sounding name, “quantitative easing,” whatever in the hell THAT was… Don’t like it? Just declare it “hate speech.” That’s what Facebook is doing about that "horrible atrocity," children’s prayer… Liberals say “We have a right to violence” against those we disagree with, while calling it the GOP’s fault… Chelsea Clinton says it is “unChristian” to end legal abortion. What? UnChristian to stop murdering infants in (and out of) the womb? That’s about as believable as saying her father is “a good man”… Former NYC Mayor Bloomberg is actually going to run for president! He really thinks he has a chance in hell of winning just because one billionaire did it. Never mind things are entirely different between the two of them. He is a well known anti-gun fool and that’s a big negative…

.